this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
959 points (99.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

7756 readers
2217 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm often asking this: how can presidential pardons be defended as acceptable at all, even outside Trump?

This was bound to happen at some point. Presidential pardons were just waiting to be abused.

They're not a thing in many other counties. And thank Christ for that.

Being able to personally just overturn the courts is bar shit insane.

I bet you, there will be political assassinations coming that Trump will simply pardon.

The thing is, if he has no involvement, was this even illegal before the supreme court gave Trump their get-out-of-jail-free card?

Not a laywer, but I could imagine it wouldn't have been.

Trump aside, y'all need to get rid of executive pardons.

Oh, and electronic voting.

Sincerely, from the provinces. Please.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

So, ostensibly, pardons are meant to be a way to override the Justice system where it has failed to provide justice. If the law is unjust or it's application was unjust, a pardon can correct that. And ideally it is used sparingly and by a President that that can be trusted to be an arbiter of wisdom and morality. So there's just about no limitations on the power. And the other branches are meant to give consequences for unethical applications of it, like quid pro quo pardons/bribery. But obviously that is not how it works in practice.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The theoretical argument is that any justice system no matter how well thought out and well intentioned, will eventually result in edge cases where justice fails to be done. Especially when implemented on a large scale. There are already appeals, and those can fail too. Plenty of examples of people actually being railroaded.

You can just accept that , or you turn to democracy to try alleviate the most egregious cases. Thats what the pardon is for - no process, no more appeals. Just the president, the people's highest representative, and a pen.

It sometimes works (as in, is probably a net benefit) when the person wielding this power fears the people and will pay (at least) a political price for misusing it. Pardoning someone he knows is a complete of the power. Enriching himself by essentially selling pardons throws the whole thing into the world of comedy. Any talk of the theoretical merits of it is laughable.

You can argue that this was inevitable. Maybe you're right. But that was the intent, and it's failure is another symptom of the American democracy degenerating towards failure. Trump won't pay a price for this. Even on conservative forums where they hangwring about "not getting why he's doing this" (as they stare straight at the naked corruption), none of them will change their votes. Nobody is interested in holding him accountable.

This democratic failure has widespread consequences. The open corruption of the pardons process is actually one of the smaller symptoms of it.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

I mean even if you're not explicitly selling pardons you don't have to worry about the political consequences of a pardon if it's your last term in office and can't run anymore due to being term limited. So the system is broke from the very start and just allows presidents to override enforcement of laws they don't like at the federal level.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Maybe the Luigi Brothers should stop by and "un-pardon" him?

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

i love this. US laws regarding bribery are barely a notch above the honor system already.

the rules are basically "hey, you can take bribes in return for favors, but please make sure that your briber doesn't say 'I'm giving you this sack of money, conviently labeled "bribes", as a bribe so you can do favors for me in exchange' and you don't say 'understood, i will abuse my power to do favors for you in exchange for this bribe'—and as long as you don't both say these things on record and label the money as ’bribes’ you're good"...

... and this motherfucker's like "let's just do it anyway, we'll get away with it so who cares"

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wait a minute, I have a plan:

DC is a Federal Jurisdiction. There is no State that can also prosecute you.

So, I go rob a bank in DC, then buy a pardon with the money I just got.

Profit?

🤔

checks my skin color

fuck nvm

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I go rob a bank

What? There's nothing in a bank worth robbing nowadays.

If you want to be pardoned you have to think big and make sure something goes to a Trump.

[–] gex@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Also make sure to not steal from someone rich, so stick to wage theft, crypto scams or tax fraud

[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 77 points 4 days ago (2 children)

When the rich are able to buy pardons, vigalantes are justified.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago

We have tyranny and no rule of law anyway, so yeah might as well.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Punisher soundtrack intensifies

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 133 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It is weird having the corruption so in-your-face.

[–] Bread@sh.itjust.works 29 points 4 days ago

Its Luigi Time!

[–] some_dude@lemm.ee 41 points 4 days ago (2 children)

There's a weird reverse ethical principle about it, as if it's somehow more honest this way.

[–] lucelu2@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago

Murder is only a crime if you are not rich, a politician or a policeman.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Less theater around it

[–] GiveOver@feddit.uk 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It must suck to be a conspiracy theorist when The Powers That Be don't even bother hiding anything

[–] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 3 days ago

I think most conspiracists are MAGA, tbh. They probably think all this is fine because it happened before or something.

[–] wulrus@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

I would have thought that restitution is not a criminal, but a civil matter and can't be subject to presidential pardon.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 82 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Wait, the pardon can invalidate having to pay restitution too‽

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 63 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Looks like it. So that guy just made a profit of 3.4 million (1 mil for the bribe out of 4.4 mil he had to pay back).

[–] grue@lemmy.world 75 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

That's not even the part I'm shocked about. Cancelling prison or even fines for the perp is one thing, but it's fucking absurd that Trump can just unilaterally decide the victims don't get their money back!

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 75 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The current system doesn't have more vigilante justice, because people still believe that it's better as a whole to have justice be impartial and not take things into their own hands. Acts like these destroy this illusion. These people who got screwed over now see there is no justice to be had by trusting the system, so why not go all green Mario to see justice done? Each of these acts is like a hammer to the dam of popular sentiment.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah this is the reason there's so much violence in the drug trade. If someone robs a drug dealer, they can't go to the police. If someone encroaches on a gang's territory, they can't sue. If a cartel budges out a rival cartel through shady business practices, there's no legal recourse. So the result of all the situations is extreme violence.

That's the end road here if the justice system continues to be corrupted. There will eventually become a point where people see the rich getting richer off the suffering of others, and with no legal recourse, will resort to violence.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The 2nd Amendment exists as a remedy when all the other Amendments fail.

[–] Goltbrook@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Yet I fear that the second amendment mostly exists as a pacifier to keep people clinging to the perceived security of "having the 2nd amendment after all".

Keeping something as a last resort is meaningless if you are never willing to actually tap it.

Then it is just comfort.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

His pardon gets him off the hook for Federal criminal charges, but I wonder if he could still be found liable in a civil lawsuit.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 12 points 3 days ago

Yes, he can. Further, Burdick v. US basically says that accepting a pardon is evidence of guilt. The conviction and pardon can be used as evidence in the civil suit.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's a dangerous game tho.
It can very well invalidate the life of the pardoned as well, if one of the aggrieved party has nothing left to lose because of that wage theft.
I wonder how long Donvict can continue before he gets stopped for good.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Relevant

CEO decides to FA with his cancer-stricken employee's pay, FO's what a knife to the neck feels like.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 7 points 3 days ago

I wish I was on that jury, I'd never vote to convict.

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The judge wasn't technically wrong though. This was a "get out of jail for $1M card".

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Creed always said it best, but he undersold them.

"You don't go by Monopoly, man. That game is nuts. Nobody just picks up Get Out of Jail Free cards. Those things cost thousands." - Creed

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Can someone explain again how this isn’t criminal corruption?

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"If the president does it it's not illegal. - Richard M. Nixon" - The Supreme Court

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm so fucking pissed that this is literarily true. Worse yet, wasn't it just some fucking memo they pushed out? The equivalent of scribbling get out of jail on a napkin and the cops going, ah he's got documentation, nothing we can do.

One of the biggest failures of Biden is doing NOTHING to limit the presidents powers or to increase accountability, because he himself didn't want to be held accountable for anything.

[–] lucelu2@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Actually it was the job of Congress to do that. Any Executive Order Biden signed could be reversed (and most were) by the next CIC in the WH.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Yea that's a fair point. I just wish he'd have made a precedence of Presidents being held accountable and anyone else in power. But he avoided that because he was afraid of it being used on him.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 5 points 3 days ago

It is, they just don't care

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rothaine@lemm.ee 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No get out of jail free card, but apparently a get out of jail for $1mil card.

[–] 0k_@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Get out of jail and out of paying $4.4 million for $1 million. So it's a "get out of jail and here take this $3.4 million" card.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago

This is nothing new. He did this at the end of his first term too.

Further proof that Trump is a shrewd businessman. Joe Biden gave his pardons away for free, like a sucker.

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 4 days ago

Now That's What I Call ~~Bribery~~ two completely unrelated events 84!

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

When Indulgences return, where is our modern day Jan Hus or Martin Luther?

[–] Datorie@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Probably already illegally detained and shipped off to a torture prison in one of americas vassal states

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

This will just make the GOP more loyal to Trump now that they know they don't have to follow rules.

[–] Robotsandstuff@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I mean, he will do more tomorrow, and no one can do anything about it legally......

load more comments
view more: next ›