this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
1250 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

30924 readers
1 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages πŸ”₯

https://status.lemmy.world/

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations πŸ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think this decentralization and federation is what web3 is all about, without all the corporations calling everything to do with monkey pixel art that costs a million dollars "web3"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sunspider@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Hey! This post is not specifically related to the lemmy.world instance. From now on, posts such as these will be removed, in order for the community to stay on topic. However, as this is a highly upvoted post, I'll just lock it for now.

[–] colorfulmoth@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago (13 children)

I hate how crypto bros and scammers kidnapped the term web3. In reality is a nice concept, but they just turned it into a libertarian dystopia.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (11 children)

It's nice to have this space to retreat to. Even if it doesn't outcompete the corporate web anytime soon, the existence of another option will constrain how bad they can get a bit, and will create a place for refugees to go after each new outrage. And it's not like the core functionality of any of the corporate sites was that complicated underneath all the bloat, after people have been on here working out the kinks for a while there's no reason it should be any less convenient of an experience.

[–] Weerdo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Feels like old school forums again. A little barebones compared to some of the corporate stuff, but that's not a bad thing. Just the simple what's needed no extra fluff.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It's pretty dope. Been following the fediverse for a while, but I've never used twitter so mastodon felt kinda useless to me. I've never used facebook, so friendica felt kinda useless to me.

Anonymous strangers posting links and having discussions? Now that's more my jam.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Same here, neither of those are my thing, but lemmy scratches my needs. Of course without reddit fucking up, I would never have checked it out, but now I’m really hoping this gets big, without losing it’s core

[–] kommanditbolag@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I've loved that part of reddit and still do to a point. The thing that's been creeping into the platform is the problem with bots and astroturfing.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Amby@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago

The crypto side of web3 definitely felt way more "consumerist minded" with the way wallets were able to connect to multiple websites(exchanges) in order to "buy" things(alt/shitcoins). But federated social media feels like a much better use of decentralization so far.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Good call. To me, Fediverse feels akin to the earlier days of the web. Fresh, new, relatively unspoiled. Nobody knows exactly wtf is going on, but the possibilities seem vast.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (26 children)

What we're seeing here seems more like a restoration of the architecture of pre-web Internet services, like SMTP, NNTP, or IRC.

The protocols are built on top of HTTPS and JSON as a session layer, rather than on lines of ASCII as in those classic protocols ... but the architecture looks a lot more like "a bunch of servers under independent administration, that agree to share messages with each other in a network" than like anything with the stink of blockchains on it.

[–] kiriakos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Sorry but I had to do it

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] lucien@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Hah, web 2.0 was all about the explosion of user-generated content. Corps and cryptonerds wanted to make web 3.0 about making money, but the web has always been about the content, not its monetization. In trying to monetize the content, they're alienating people and forcing them off the platforms they defaulted to.

Humans like to create and share content, no matter how easy or difficult it is to monetize. If the people who want to monetize humanity's collective output make it harder to create, then hopefully the result is that people move off the ad-supported platforms and replace them with something that doesn't rely on centralization with lots of capital to stay afloat.

If nothing else, the way that youtube has made it impossible for segments of the creative community to monetize their content and forced them rely on platforms such as patreon has made it more and more clear that ad-generated revenue is a dead end. You can't force people to view advertising unless you hold their content hostage, and for the first time in history, they can't buy out the means of production.

[–] bandario@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Every single platform that has claimed "Web 3.0" has been revealed to be a crypto scam, and generally not even a sneaky one. Pop over to minds.com if you'd like a free taste of exactly what that ends up looking like. It's disgusting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ultimate_question@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

replace them with something that doesn’t rely on centralization with lots of capital to stay afloat

There's no conceivable reason that reddit shouldn't be profitable right now with the market saturation they have unless the majority of people who've been making money off of the site up until now have been minimal effort contributors trying to get their piece of the money pie. 99% of the work is done by "unpaid" (by reddit) mods yet somehow they still have 2k people on the payroll and still need to centralize more and more capital to cover the overhead, it's easy to imagine most of their current expenses are going to dumb corporate tech money sinks that are going out of style fast and have little to show for the last decade of spending lol

[–] berkeleyblue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I mean that’s maybe the only good thing: If they are a public traded company, they have to file public revenue reports. Would love to see where those morons burn their money…

[–] lucien@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

2k people in expensive San Francisco office space. Willing to bet that the % of them dedicated to improving user experience was quite low in comparison to those trying to figure out how to squeeze money out of it.

[–] BobKillsNinjas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (9 children)

I was resistant to the federverses, but these corpos just think they can get away with anything...

Fuck them I won't do what they tell me!

It will be fun to watch this place grow, it feels like the start of a new story!

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Faceman2K23@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Long way to go for ease of use, but the foundation is SOLID.

Decentralised without crypto-ifying everything. this is the way.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ndr@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I do not like using Web3 to refer to federated platforms. Indeed, Web3 is strongly associated with blockchains, cryptocurrencies and NFTs.

[–] wheels@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

To me Web3 meant federated or p2p stuff, like Secure Scuttlebutt, way before cryptocurrency and NFTs stole the term. I think we should steal it back rather than stop using it!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] nattekrant@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Web 1.0, users form communities on bulletin boards, internet forums and newsgroups. It's the birth of Web 2.0, investors and advertisers see potential in large user bases. This leads to social media and mobile apps as fronts for tracking users and big data collection. Smart home and wearables become a plot to bring tracking hardware into your life even when you aren't actively engaging on the internet. The tech billionaire is born at the cost of the privacy and wallet of the user. Web 3.0, a federated Web 1.0 where users take back control of the internet. Tech billionaires live in homeless shelters and eat ramen noodles.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheVHSWizard@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So you're saying that the real web3 was... the friends we made along the way?

[–] odin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

web3 was within us the whole time

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Wasn't web3 about everything being under control of a handful of mega corps that own everything? So more like web4 then.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

yeah, i love this new paradigm. i don't understand it but i hope it'll lead to a better experience with cool usability features later on. hopefully a good buffer against evil & suits & etc

i love how post URLs have numbers now. you can get dubs and trips!

[–] Blaed@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I say let’s keep up this momentum and continue making this a space people want to be in and engage with.

We’re already off to a strong start, let’s commit and see what new corner of the internet we can define for ourselves.

[–] daniel@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (8 children)

The future of the internet isn't artificially scarce digital collectibles? 😲

[–] bhj@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It better be! I spent millions on jpgs of monkeys! /s

[–] kiriakos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Please tell me they weren't highly compressed jpegs

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] akvomelono@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

dude you got ripped off, my monkey is a png

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] UnusedEngine@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Wishfully thinking, but, I hope companies follow this

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί