this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
291 points (98.0% liked)

World News

47864 readers
3382 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tehran “is the principal source of regional instability and terror,” declare G7 leaders in a joint statement.

The leaders of the G7 countries on Monday issued a joint statement saying Iran should not have nuclear weapons and affirming Israel's right to defend itself.

"Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror. We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon," declared the statement, issued by the leaders of the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Canada and Japan, along with the EU.

They pledged to "remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 171 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Israel is the principal source of regional instability and terror and everyone and his dog knows this.

The kowtowing to Trump and his Zionist sponsors by the client states of the US Empire is an insult to objective reality.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 37 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Please don't make Iran out to be some sort of victim in all this. What Israel is doing is wrong, but Iran has funded a lot of terrorists throughout the years, and execute people in medival ways for holding hands with the "wrong" person.

The iranian government is pure fucking evil and deserves to die horrible deaths for what they instigate and fund around the world and in their local area.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a deep sarcasm that Western oil companies destabilized the Iranian monarchy, that * shockingly* wanted a piece of the pie in such a way it paved the way for islamist extremists to gain power.

Ian used to be pretty liberal and western minded, however westen meddling caused this extreme government.

But God forbid they get the means to (to use the Israeli turn off phrase) 'defend' itself, that would be horrendous.

[–] Velypso@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yes, yes, we all know Iran used to be liberal a very long time ago.

That ship has sailed, and the current regime isn't great, to say the very least.

Nuclear bombs would not be used to defend Iran. They would be used to defend Khamenei. In the same way that nukes are for defending that shit stain in Israel and not Israel.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ik no fan of the current regime, I think both Israel and Iran would benefit from a regime change. There's nothing more moral on the Israeli side to explain them deserving nukes over anyone in that region.

But the hypocrisy is that the Western world directly caused this shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Ok, which country is actively committing genocide?

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And not only that, Israel has nuclear weapons.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

...and it's supposed to be a secret because God forbid having to comply with international treaties on nukes. Well it's not like they respect international law anyway right? But the ones on nukes they just bypass and no one bats an eye

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 103 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

I believe ALL of the following;

  • Iran should not have nuclear weapons
  • Israel should not have nuclear weapons
  • Iran should not weaponize Palestinian suffering or coax them into attacking Israel while Iran itself sees little repercussions
  • Israel should not genocide
  • Israel has committed genocide and should pay a hefty price
  • Neither Iran nor Israel will really answer for their fuckery
  • Palestinians will remain fucked...if they survive.

My heart breaks for the Palestinian people who suffer and die for others' greed, ambition, and political squabbles.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Exactly. This is not a competition, we don’t have to cheer for either side. Horrible things are happening

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

My exact thoughts

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Vupperware@lemm.ee 51 points 1 week ago (21 children)

“We will do anything to maintain the status quo, up to and including genocidal ethnosupremacy”!

I am honestly so revolted.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 49 points 1 week ago (25 children)

nobody should have nuclear weapons.

Sometimes I wonder what the world would be like if the scientists working on the Manhattan project had all agreed it's too much and intentionally sabotage every test.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

China, India, and Pakistan once again proving that having nukes does actually matter because you can't be arbitrarily shoved around around by the only other nuclear powers.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 11 points 1 week ago

it also helps if your air defense network doesn't collapse immediately because it turns out that in order to guard these nukes you need also regular capable conventional military

[–] frezik@midwest.social 42 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Ukraine had nukes and gave them up. They were invaded.

Iraq gave up their WMD program after the first Gulf War. They were invaded again.

Iran definitely had a nuclear program, but doesn't appear to be pursuing it anymore. They're getting attacked and quite possibly will get invaded.

South Africa had a nuclear program and gave it up. Left alone.

The Great Powers, particularly the United States but also Russia, have shown that your country should just keep going once you start. Chances are, you'll get invaded, anyway.

This is not the way towards anti-proliferation.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Iran is two weeks away from nuclear capability" - Netanyahu: 2012, 2015, 2018, 2023, 2025

[–] smol_beans@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

He started a lot earlier than 2012

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Tehran “is the principal source of regional instability and terror,”

I guess we all just have to pretend Israel doesn't exist?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 36 points 1 week ago

But genocide against Palestinians is a-OK.

What does the "G" in G7 stand for? Gaslighting? Genocide? Grift? Maybe there are 7 Gs.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Why? If the West will allow Israel to live stream a genocide and both political parties in the US stick their fingers in their ears and make sounds like children, Iran has no choice but to pursue a nuke to defend itself.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago

I would have worded this differently, but you're right in that it's probably a good idea not to give anyone an extra excuse.

"Oh but we had to" isn't a great excuse, but it is one, and if you take away the threat, it takes it away that argument.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] wpb@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (39 children)

Ukraine gave up their nukes, look what happened to them. Libya gave their nuclear weapons program up, and look at them today. North Korea didn't, and they're still standing, for better or for worse. Iraq was accused of having nukes, but didn't have them, and got destroyed. Seems that if you want any semblance of sovereignty outside of NATO, you better have some nukes.

So for any nations reading along I'll summarize the basic conclusions:

  1. Get nukes
  2. If you have nukes, do not give them up
  3. If you're accused of having nukes, drop everything and get nukes asap

Do you think Israel would be bombing Iran if they had nukes?

load more comments (39 replies)
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 week ago

Jesus fucking Christ. Fuck all of these assholes.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Iran will have nukes. They don't have a choice. Not anymore. It's existentialism at this point. Israel has been trying to engineer a war against Iran for more than 30 years. All the while Iran has played along. IAEA inspectors and all that good shit. And it was all for nothing. Iran knows that now. So does everyone else.

If you're an adversary to the US and its Imperial interests then its a matter of when, not if. Doesn't matter if or how closely you follow their rules. They will come for you in time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

People with nuclear weapons have forbidden you from having nuclear weapons?

Humans are a goofy lot.

[–] f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Religious zealots can't be allowed to have nukes. You have to at least masquerade as a well-adjusted nation while you develop the nukes and slowly massage your zealots into positions of power over a few decades. Those are the rules.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] zymagoras777@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nobody should have nukes, you fucking hypocrites..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Why not? The claims made by G7 members as to why are admissions - heck, one of the members has used nuclear weapons on civilians, and they’re still allowed to have them.

If anyone can, everyone can.

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 13 points 1 week ago

Probably best for all of us if nobody can ever have nuclear weapons, but what do i know..

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Israel is the criminal and everyone knows it.

Israel will face the long-term consequences of its reckless behavior. Just not today.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 12 points 1 week ago (41 children)

Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror.

Ok does someone want to catch me up on this opinion shared by world leaders but quite literally no one else?

Like yes, Iran is a terrible authoritarian state that is very dangerous. But so is Saudi Arabia?!

load more comments (41 replies)
[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

NO ONE should have them. Dumb asses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 9 points 1 week ago

Nukes for me but not for thee

load more comments
view more: next ›