I believe it's a lot of exaggeration to call it that. Like, an egregious amount.
this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
19 points (66.1% liked)
United Kingdom
5167 readers
212 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
North Yorkshire's first fixed-location speed camera
Am I misunderstanding or is this saying that North Yorkshire hasn't had any traditional speed cameras up until now?
That’s exactly how I read it, I had to go through the article a couple of times to make sure I was getting what the author meant, and I think it’s exactly that
Yeah, it seems unbelievable, I was starting to question what it really meant by "fixed speed camera" as if it were something different to what we usually see. I wonder how they've managed to go so long without one?
It does explain the tendency of drivers in North Yorkshire to drive around tiny country lanes at 50 miles an hour.
Speed cameras don’t increase safety. Just ticket revenue.
Well no they discourage fast driving, and discouraging fast driving means there are less fast drivers, and therefore accidents are less likely.
I don't understand why people feel the need to drive fast anyway, it hardly has any effect on your arrival time unless you're travelling literally 200 yd.
If you're going to drive at 40 in a 20 then frankly I have no sympathy, you're an asshole and you deserve to be taken to the cleaners.
Well no they discourage fast driving
Not really, or at least not with the fixed cameras. They encourage speeding as normal then harsh braking just before the camera then speeding again. Just watch traffic on the motorways when a temporary speed limit is imposed. People slow down for the gantries where there might be cameras mounted then floor it to the next gantry.
Average speed cameras are a better bet if you want to control speeding, but perhaps don't make as much money.
They at least punish the assholes who drive too fast.
They don’t though. The people who can afford a traffic lawyer or know how the system works just get them dismissed. It’s just another tax on those with the least resources.
Depends on the country.
fine based on x percent of monthly income is a good one.
Look up some examples from Finland or Switzerland for the more extreme examples.
And in the UK (where Yorkshire is) we have a points system. If you build up 12 points you lose your license, and speeding can get you between 3-6 points per offence depending how serious it was. So it's really not just a case of the rich speeding all the time, paying the fines and carrying on.
It’s just another tax
Nobody is forcing people to drive over the speed limit. It's a fine, not a tax.
Bullshit.