this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
18 points (65.5% liked)

United Kingdom

5051 readers
324 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ironic that many drivers call for cyclists to display identification numbers, but object to being held accountable themselves.

It is no exageration to call this terrorism. So many innocent people are killed and injured because of these speeding maniacs.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I believe it's a lot of exaggeration to call it that. Like, an egregious amount.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

North Yorkshire's first fixed-location speed camera

Am I misunderstanding or is this saying that North Yorkshire hasn't had any traditional speed cameras up until now?

[–] PennyRoyal@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That’s exactly how I read it, I had to go through the article a couple of times to make sure I was getting what the author meant, and I think it’s exactly that

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, it seems unbelievable, I was starting to question what it really meant by "fixed speed camera" as if it were something different to what we usually see. I wonder how they've managed to go so long without one?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 23 hours ago

It does explain the tendency of drivers in North Yorkshire to drive around tiny country lanes at 50 miles an hour.

[–] captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org -2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Speed cameras don’t increase safety. Just ticket revenue.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Well no they discourage fast driving, and discouraging fast driving means there are less fast drivers, and therefore accidents are less likely.

I don't understand why people feel the need to drive fast anyway, it hardly has any effect on your arrival time unless you're travelling literally 200 yd.

If you're going to drive at 40 in a 20 then frankly I have no sympathy, you're an asshole and you deserve to be taken to the cleaners.

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 3 points 8 hours ago

Well no they discourage fast driving

Not really, or at least not with the fixed cameras. They encourage speeding as normal then harsh braking just before the camera then speeding again. Just watch traffic on the motorways when a temporary speed limit is imposed. People slow down for the gantries where there might be cameras mounted then floor it to the next gantry.

Average speed cameras are a better bet if you want to control speeding, but perhaps don't make as much money.

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They at least punish the assholes who drive too fast.

[–] captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

They don’t though. The people who can afford a traffic lawyer or know how the system works just get them dismissed. It’s just another tax on those with the least resources.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 3 points 8 hours ago

It’s just another tax

Nobody is forcing people to drive over the speed limit. It's a fine, not a tax.

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Depends on the country.

fine based on x percent of monthly income is a good one.

Look up some examples from Finland or Switzerland for the more extreme examples.

[–] PlungeButter@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

And in the UK (where Yorkshire is) we have a points system. If you build up 12 points you lose your license, and speeding can get you between 3-6 points per offence depending how serious it was. So it's really not just a case of the rich speeding all the time, paying the fines and carrying on.