16
submitted 1 year ago by dope@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

I know… it’s the entertainment network that shall not be named. However, I find it so interesting that this actually aired.

Jessica is there to incite anger to the viewers because the network knows that the biggest reactions are anger. It’s an easier emotion to manipulate.

The producers don’t care about law and reason. They are opportunists that hunger for more and more money to hoard. And, in my opinion and sadly, Jessica is just a tool to them. Thoughts?

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I am a firm believer in freedom of the press, but my god is it hard to hold onto that belief these days with the outright lies that get aired and zero consequences to that lying.

[-] wbl@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Outsized influence means outsized regulation. Every small outlet should be able to publish completely as they please. The bigger one gets, the more limited resources one takes (from the traditional radio spectrum to modern social media front page real estate), the more one should be subject to fair regulation. The fairness doctrine needs to come back now more than ever.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
16 points (94.4% liked)

Politics

10162 readers
83 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS