this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
82 points (98.8% liked)

politics

22723 readers
87 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.

Take any slop posts to the slop trough

Main is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cinnaa42@hexbear.net 40 points 4 days ago (3 children)

i like how Iran has never committed a single act of "terrorism" or supported any organisation which does and yet

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Have you consider that they’re brown?

[–] cinnaa42@hexbear.net 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

brown and Muslim. how dare they

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago

but muh iran-backed militias in post-saddam iraq.

who destabilized iraq? don't worry about it.

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] cinnaa42@hexbear.net 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Actions against the US, UK, Israel etc are justified as part of the hybrid war these states have been fighting against one another for decades, and most of these are based on pretty flimsy evidence/accusations. Most major states could be called "sponsors of terrorism" if this is what qualifies. Of course, that's not to say that stuff like the Fatwa against Rushdie is good, or based, just that this pales in comparison to what other states have done to Iran for the past couple of centuries.

Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones. The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society. This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature. The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population. Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education). It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights.

Albert Einstein

How to stop being a liberal: realizing that this extends to media beyond just media that glazes Trump

[–] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 36 points 4 days ago

Honestly he should get it, the price is a joke anyway. If kissinger can get it why can't he?

[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 32 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If Obama got one don't see why Trump can't get one either, it's clearly a complete sham.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Hell, they gave one to Kissinger.

[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago

Oh yeah I forgot about that, what a fucking joke.

[–] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 12 points 3 days ago

Oh no, the legitimacy of my international liberal institutions is threatened!

pearl-clutch

[–] SwitchyandWitchy@hexbear.net 25 points 4 days ago

Worst state sponsor of terrorism

The projection is strong with this one.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Hey aren't you the same person that should be banned for whining about your pro-Zionist bullshit story about Palestinians supposed mass SA against settlers got removed?

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If you share receipts with me I'll ban them

Edit: found it

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 25 points 4 days ago (36 children)

You're the person posting hasbara atrocity propaganda, and you're here to tell us that corporate media can't be trusted because dRuMpF bAd

Amazing

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] dumpster_dove@hexbear.net 22 points 4 days ago

Bush already stopped Saddam from using WMDs, and he never got the price. Trump is still playing catch up.

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago

cheeto obama-medal cheeto-man

Complete the farse circle. Make the award really worthless. unlimited-power DEW IT!

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 11 points 3 days ago

The funniest possible outcome is that Trump gets dozens of newsworthy nominations, but still doesn't win the Prize.

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago

fuck it, why not

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I've said it before, but I really don't understand how these "Journalists" function. Like, surely they would know that flat out lying to people is the opposite of all those starry-eyed dreams they had studying journalism at uni. Like, surely someone gets into journalism because they want to inform the public, or they want to win a Pulitzer or something. So I don't get how they could be so soulless in their career, how do they justify it to themselves? Is it just the money? Is it the "if I wasn't doing this, someone else would be, so I might as well benefit" are they true believers who think that anything can be justified, as long as it makes "their side" look good? I can't imagine them being anything other than incredibly evil and selfish, or incredibly naive or stupid, or some combination of the two.

I don't think there's a single group of people I would trust less than journalists, maybe political scientists or economists.

EDIT: I think I might've found a worse group of people, the sort of people who recognise that journalists are full of shit, and yet will take the word of journalists as gospel, as long as it agrees with their preconceived notions about the scary brown people.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago

opinion section, sounds like the NYT isn't the only paper with a bedbug problem

[–] FedPosterman5000@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago

The “cool” nations should make an equivalent award, but that doesn’t go to war criminals

[–] SoyViking@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Make it a double whammy and give him the fake one for economy as well

[–] goferking0 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Throw in a science one as well

load more comments
view more: next ›