The hive exist, or desire to please the survivors. However they want. Koumba has used this more than anyone else to his own advantage to live the life of a decadent, hedonistic and shallow playboy - roleplaying as James Bond and surrounding himself and having sex with women. Now, to me - this is very much - at the minimum - taking advantage of them. The women he's having sexual relations with are not who they were, and it is unlikely - even if the hive came to him and suggested it (as I suspect they did) - that the women before the joining would be remotely interested in doing this. They are not them. Who they were has been lobotomised, malformed and disappeared into the hive - segmented up into billions of bodies.

I've seen some people (not here, but elsewhere) suggest that this behaviour is okay because the hive is consenting. The women he's picking show enthusiastic and active consent. This to me is disgraceful, not just in the context of that - but also what could be the case if Koumba had different, darker interests.

Now the show will not address this (and rightfully so) - but it still seems true to me regardless of that. If Koumba was a pedophile, they would provide him with children he requested - and the children would provide active consent. Just like the women he picks now, they wouldn't be who they were. There is no concept of childhood or child innocence anymore. The hive literally can't say no unless it contradicts their survival or asks them to hurt others.

So to anyone who thinks the hive is a good thing (and some people actually do), or that Koumba is doing no wrong with what he's doing. This should be a point to consider.

all 32 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Dalacos@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Also highlights that the hive could simply be a weapon used as an opening salvo. A first strike, by an alien species.

They send a repeating code to a planet that converts virtually the entire population into extreme pacifism. And it makes them utterly complaint?

Could be they were worried humanity would become a threat to them eventually so figured out a way to eliminate the threat, and/or they've cleared a wide open path to taking over Earth at their time of choosing.

One way or another, as a hive, Humanity isn't a problem like it would be with individuality.

[–] zarniwoop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That’s been my suspicion, especially with the 10 year revelation. Seems to me to be nothing more than a genocide method really.

[–] dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

Yes this was also my first thought. Prime the planet for easy conquest.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They send a repeating code to a planet that converts virtually the entire population into extreme pacifism. And it makes them utterly complaint?

why not go the much more simple route and kill them all with a deadly virus?

[–] Dalacos@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lots of imaginative reasons:

Firstly a realistic one, 100% mortality in a virus designed to kill is actually really difficult. Whereas a spreader with a near 0 mortality has the chance to actually spread. (The game Plague INC. does this well.)
The population is (relatively) intact, and they could have "uses" for said population after the fact. (Slaves, food, experiments, etc etc etc.)
The aliens that spread it could themselves be hive, and they themselves could have been targeted by yet another species, and spreading it as part of their newfound need to procreate as a hive. It may not have originated where the signal was sent from.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

The aliens that spread it could themselves be hive, and they themselves could have been targeted by yet another species, and spreading it as part of their newfound need to procreate as a hive. It may not have originated where the signal was sent from.

yes i think that is the most likely scenario, but that doesn't necessarily need to be an "opening salvo". proliferation itself may be the only goal.

[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Now the show will not address this (and rightfully so)

....yeah. And there's a hive-mind / transitive property question Carol could have asked Laxmi's son which would have been a huge wham moment that would have really shaken Laxmi but I'm glad the show didn't go there.

Also: !pluribus@lemmy.zip

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 8 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I posted it here specifically because I don't know how the owner of that community would take to me making this observation.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Which question?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

If the boy would be willing to sleep with her (Carol)

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Zosia specifically said "we can't really protect you (Carol) from each other" I think the season will end with one of them trying to kill the other or mass destruction or something.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

If the moral value of consent is about ensuring bodily and social autonomy for individuals, that's kind of already entirely out the window in this situation to the point where it doesn't seem like sex could meaningfully make it worse. What he's doing is a violation of norms and is creepy, but it doesn't seem like something that could cause actual harm. That's in contrast with Carol's interactions with the hive, which are all much more sympathetic, but did cause harm in various ways.

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

My hatred of hive minds grows! Soon everyone will see the inherent evil!

I might have played too much Mutants and Masterminds with a dm that loved using hive mind as villains!

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There is no concept of childhood or child innocence anymore.

I don't think we really know that fore sure. we have seen a few kids, but we don't know much about how they are handled by the collective.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why would they be handled differently beyond accounting for their smaller frame?

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

who knows? introducing new life and new consciousnesses to the hive mind may need to ba handled in a specific way.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 6 points 3 months ago

I'm talking about the current crop of children now, not to-be-born children.

[–] adhocfungus@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago

In theory they aren't individuals anymore, they are appendages. So there would be no issue with consent the same way you decide consent for your hand or mouth. In a sense your mouth consents because it is part of the you making that decision.

Except... If there were any chance your hand could separate from you and become an individual in the future it'd be immoral to use it for sex now. And Carol is already very confident that it's possible to reverse the Joining. But even if she wasn't it was always a possibility. So having sex with any of them is incredibly wrong, which should be obvious to anybody on a gut level.

[–] GreyCat@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Didn't he specifically say that he does not have sexual relations with hive mind individuals ?
Like there was an episode in which he specifically got offended by Carol insinuating it.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 6 points 3 months ago

I don't recall that. He seemed a bit upset about her attacking him over it, how she viewed him because of it.

But episode 6 had him literally in a sauna surrounded by 5 naked women. Come on.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

He got offended on the insinuation that he was breaking consent. It's pretty clear he's been having sex and that he genuinely thinks the hive consents.