this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
270 points (93.8% liked)

News

33741 readers
4509 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 104 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Rent is like 50% of my income currently and I'm trapped because nowhere charges less for the same space and I don't qualify for rentals without a guarantor that I no longer have. At this age, my parents were in their 3rd house on a single income with 3 kids.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 48 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

The wealthy really fucked us over, hey. They're scum for what they did.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 43 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They're scum for what they are currently still doing, and must be stopped.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago

1000%. Preach it!

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

They are also scum for what they are doing.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Guitarfun@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Same and I live in what would be considered a rural state. We don't have any big cities and a studio apartment would cost me about $1500 a month about 50 miles outside our biggest city and $1800+ within 50 miles of Portland Maine which is our biggest city. This shit is out of control. Our wages are more in line with a rural state, but our rent prices are near what you'd expect in a bigger city.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

that's because your real estate is bought up by people like me with 150K salaries who think your 1800 rent is dirt cheap. In Boston a studio is over 3K now.

i know people who moved to Maine to find cheaper housing because none is available in Boston area. and the people who live in Boston fight any/all development to expand the housing supply, including renters. like i have friends who rent, who pay 3K a month, and then go to town meetings to fight new housing developments, and then complain went there rent goes up another 10%

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 70 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

"a family of four needs $136,500 a year"

I could see that, more likely in more expensive areas. You aren't getting anywhere in New York or San Francisco on $140K.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

in New York or San Francisco on $140K.

A month?

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

plenty of people live in these cities on less than 140K and are doing fine.

I live in Boston and I do great and a few years ago I was only making 70K.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] coolcat1711@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

I highly recommend that you read the actual substack article.

The claim is based around how the original poverty line was the cost of food multiplied by 3. This assumes that food is 33% of your spending and that your other expenses are approximately the other 67%.

The $140k value is based around the fact that the ratio has shifted immensely. Food is cheap in the US relative to the other goods/services required to live in society. If you take the new ratio and extrapolate it out, the multiplier is over 10x the cost of food to account for the other components of spending.

Even if you want to debate the actual number itself. The poverty line is laughable and anyone living at it is legitimately destitute, not just in "casual poverty"

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 2 weeks ago

Like always, how far your money goes depends on multiple factors. 140k in the Midwest alone means you're living comfortably. Like all bills paid off, a lot of extra money for leisure, etc.

If you have a family and live in the bay area, then it's not that much. I personally wouldn't put it at poverty, but it'd be somewhat close to being paycheck to paycheck (assuming you still need to pay mortgage and whatnot)

[–] SantasMagicalComfort@piefed.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That doesn't even buy a single politician.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought I heard Sam Bankman-Fried say he was surprised at how little it cost, it was like $50k or something.

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

State level politicians are like $5k-$10k. Shockingly cheap but you do need to buy most of the set.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

I live alone in a moderately low cost of living area making about 52k take home. With no extenuating expenses related to health I can put away a hundred or two a month after rent, gas, utilities, food and car maintenance (I drive and fix old shit myself rather than make a car payment). But that is literally all I can do. If I had a second person to support or was in any other area I'd be underwater quick.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

This is highly dependant on where you live, as has been said before.

[–] ChokingHazard@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yes. The people saying no are no longer temporarily embarrassed millionaires but temporarily embarrassed middle class. Have or have not, and 140k is have not given inflation, healthcare, education, food, rent/mortgage, energy etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lukaro@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If $140,000 is the poverty line can I please make poverty wages?

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago

This calculation is for a family of four. Please read more than the headline and comments.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PearOfJudes@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Well shit thats a little Less than 3x what I make lol. 💀💀💀💀

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The substack is well worth the read.

[–] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

Math that a lot of us educated poverty-livers have done before. Its refreshing to see one of the econ-bros validate it.

[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Which method does the U.S. use to calculate its poverty line?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United_States#Poverty_income_thresholds

TL;DR: "The U.S. poverty line is calculated as three times the cost of a minimum food diet in 1963, adjusted for inflation."

[–] Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Adjusted for inflation using an inflation statistic that does not factor in changes to the price of medical care, housing, or energy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

“laughable,” arguing that you can’t declare the majority of Americans impoverished because the suburbs they choose to live in are expensive, which is what Green did when he used the middle class suburb of Caldwell, New Jersey, as his median.

"My plastic surgeon said smiling is a waste of Botox, but I can't help but let out a boisterous ha cha fucking cha at the absurdity. If poor people don't want to spend so much money on cost of living they should just go live in the places nobody lives because there are no jobs or resources."

"Poor people are just so bad at managing money. That's why they have to blindly trust everything we say. We know how to spend money wisely, and we know what's best for the economy and them."

"Get out of the way Plebs! We're betting it all on AI!"

"Oh my! Well, that was unfortunate but also completely unforeseeable. I guess the only thing left to do is brush ourselves off, pat ourselves on the back for being such altruistic utilitarians, ignore the screams from the plebs and go again."

"So where's our bailout? Time is money."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›