this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
970 points (97.8% liked)

Comic Strips

20704 readers
3094 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 176 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Ok, but hear me out. The clown fox is adorable.

[–] io@piefed.blahaj.zone 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

of a joke fork that's actually better than the original.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Just run with ClownFox, or maybe PeanutFox, or just whole ass into CircusClown.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 41 points 6 days ago (8 children)

Unpopular opinion: the Firefox hate is completely out of proportion.

Whether we like it or not, a lot of users are interacting with the internet through AI agents. Every browser larger than Firefox already has AI agents locked into the browser. Firefox is providing an option for people who would like to use it, and that's it. They're providing it in a better and safer context, in which users can define the scope of access that the AI has, which AI agent they want to use, or even use a local AI model.

A lot of people here will start simping for the Google-backed Chromium browsers, or for crypto mining browsers, or for browsers that are essentially reskinned Firefox.

I've used the beta version that's out now. There's a little pop-up when it updates that says, hey, would you like to set up your choice of AI agent? If you don't want one, you just click no thanks and skip it and everything else still works the same.

Maybe I'm the one with the clown makeup in the last panel, but I just don't see what the big deal is for everybody.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 21 points 5 days ago

The backlash is over the CEO's comments of "evolving into an AI browser" instead of the current implementation

[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I like your take. An optimistic me would be fully onboard with it. But this isn't a single change in a vacuum. I think the reason people aren hating is because they're seeing it as yet another symptom of enshitification, and I don't disagree.

There are rare examples of outstanding companies like Steam that talk the talk and walk the walk. But with Firefox, they're headed the wrong direction. They cut 30% of their staff this time last year, cut their internet freedom advacacy group, and I think that was the point where they started a hard shift away from who they were. They're harvesting and selling user data now (removed the old "Nope. Never have, never will" [sell user data] from their FAQ), they've got a CEO that's taking an absolute fortune off the top of a struggling company, and they're steadily removing long time features like pocket integration and compact mode.

The last straw will be if Google ever pulls their deal as Firefox's default search engine... Mozilla will very likely pivot hard to nasty, modern money making practices to keep themselves alive if they lose 80% of their revenue all at once like that.

Isn't this already covered with extensions, though?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] eddanja@lemmy.world 65 points 6 days ago (11 children)

So if Mozilla is turning into mozzarella, what's the best next alternative?

[–] Zagam@piefed.social 49 points 6 days ago (17 children)

I like Librewolf on my PC. It shuts down a bunch of stuff right off he bat.

I'm looking for some recommendations for android devices.

[–] felbane@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Can second LibreWolf, though you have to be aware that it tweaks quite a few things in the name of privacy that you may want to turn back on.

For example, I was unable to use my FoundryVTT webapp until I re-enabled WebGL in the settings. Which reminds me, I need to see if that feature can be whitelisted per-domain or if it's all-or-nothing...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] url@feddit.fr 3 points 5 days ago

Go with ironfox on android. Can't recommend fennec they skip updates

[–] spiffpitt@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

i use ironfox, it works for me, haven't tried anything else.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] vogi@piefed.social 22 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I unironically use https://servo.org/ from time to time for light surfing like researching something on wikipedia.

It breaks on most modern websites especially SPAs of course its like super alpha but its heading in the right direction its great to have a alternative showing up in times like this.

Still have Firefox with all AI disabled for heavy usage and stuff like banking.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I might use that for an app.

I want a spreadsheet app that uses SQLite and runs with GUI on both macOS and Linux.

This feels like it would get the job done. I don’t want to use electron for the obvious reasons.

[–] vogi@piefed.social 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Tauri has servo support in development. https://servo.org/blog/2024/01/19/embedding-update/ i would assume support has gotten only better since this post was created.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There are a few browsers/browser engines in the works, but right now you could try a Firefox fork

[–] varden@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Just started with waterfox today, seems pretty good so far

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lightfire228@pawb.social 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Servo and Ladybird are in the works. They're both new browsers built from scratch, but they're both largely still in alpha

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 days ago

... Servo appears to be missing a huge opportunity by not having an ansgty gumball machine mascot.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] early_riser@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

personally I bounce between FF and Brave. Neither are ideal, FF for the reasons cited here and Brave because it stinks of crypto bro. I personally want FF to survive, it's the only non-chromium browser with any significant market share. I'm looking forward to Ladybird though.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 36 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

Can someone cue (or is it queue? que?) me in on what all the fuzz is this time around? I feel like I hear a pitchfork mob at least once a year without actually noticing anything different.

Just for the record: I'm not claiming that there's much ado about nothing, merely that I am severely out of the loop as usual.

[–] Lightfire228@pawb.social 49 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Firefox is the biggest non-chromium browser competitor, and was an advocate of privacy and not selling user data

But they recently did a 180, started selling user data, and are now shoving FF full of AI bloatware nobody wants

So the userbase is feeling very betrayed

[–] morto@piefed.social 15 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Wait, selling user data? What did I miss?

[–] Lightfire228@pawb.social 27 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

https://youtu.be/4litc5DxoHQ

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/update-on-terms-of-use/

TL;DR Mozilla doesn’t sell data about you (in the way that most people think about “selling data”), and we don’t buy data about you. We changed our language because some jurisdictions define “sell” more broadly than most people would usually understand that word. Firefox has built-in privacy and security features, plus options that let you fine-tune your data settings.

https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock/commit/d459addab846d8144b61939b7f4310eb80c5470e#diff-a24e74e4595fa85440a2f4e7e5dcfe68aba6e1e593aef05a2d35581a91423847R59

Removing "no we will never sell your data" from your Q/A page is not a good look

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 25 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Their argument is “we’re not selling your data, we’re selling our data about you.”

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BeN9o@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The new CEO has said he wants to turn Firefox into a "modern day AI browser"

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 41 points 6 days ago

He also said he doesn’t want to but they could make $150m/year by blocking ad blockers.

I get that he said he doesn’t want to, but that really should have been a non starter train of thought.

[–] solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

"Clue me in" is the idiom. ~~Que~~ Cue is closer than queue, if you were an actor and needed a hint on where to go next.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 days ago (5 children)

A cue is a marker point, usually for media production. It can be used in several contexts.

Queue would be a line, more or less.

I'm being reductive, of course. Just trying to help people who are too lazy to Google or look at a dictionary.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

it's "clue" me in on. But "cue" does make sense, from an "eggcorn" perspective. It's not the phrase, but it makes sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 28 points 6 days ago

These would be great with added text

My candidates are:

  1. We can survive without Google’s money
  2. People want Pocket by default. So what if shares your data and fills your homepage with ads.
  3. We want expand Firefox into a suite and make it AI first
  4. We’re giving up $150m/year by not blocking ad blockers
[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 21 points 6 days ago (3 children)

From what I've been noticing, they're going downhill since they started being supported by their competitor and monopoly. Could they be suffering from sabotage, I wonder...

[–] Nora@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Hasn't google pretty much always supported Mozilla/firefox? I was pretty sure this was the case since basically forever.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lps2@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (17 children)

You've got it backwards. It's the threat of anti-trust against Google's ownership of Chrome that puts Firefox at risk. Google has pretty much always supported / paid Firefox either to have Google as the default search or more direct support to stave off the anti-trust claims.

However, if Google has to sell / spin-off chrome, there is no longer as big of a reason to fund Mozilla and that's why you're seeing Moz scramble to find new ways to find funding. This AI push is no doubt a desperate attempt to lure in investor dollars as they're reading the room and see that their current funds will likely disappear in the coming years

Edit: spelling

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oxideseven@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 days ago (8 children)

What alternatives exist that aren't so locked down 90% of sites don't load?

Is it only ff forks and chromium forks? All dependant on two terrible companies?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

such is life. no one stays good forever. Enshittification is inevitable... alas...

[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago

LadyBird & Servo cannot come fast enough.

load more comments
view more: next ›