this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
562 points (99.0% liked)

News

33724 readers
3992 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Un-redacted text from released documents began circulating on social media on Monday evening

People examining documents released by the Department of Justice in the Jeffrey Epstein case discovered that some of the file redaction can be undone with Photoshop techniques, or by simply highlighting text to paste into a word processing file.

Un-redacted text from these documents began circulating through social media on Monday evening. An exhibit in a civil case in the Virgin Islands against Darren K Indyke and Richard D Kahn, two executors of Epstein’s estate, contains redacted allegations explaining how Epstein and his associates had facilitated the sexual abuse of children. The exhibit was part of the second amended complaint in the state case against Indyke and Kahn.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 27 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Ctrl+A and Ctrl+C is a hack now. Neat.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Ever show someone under 30 a keyboard shortcut? They act like you've performed magic.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

Maybe for like, Ctrl+Tab or Ctrl+Shift+T but not for copy and paste man c'mon.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 7 hours ago

One thing you can always count on with MAGAs is their virtuosic incompetence.

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So i downloaded a few of the files from the gov site and they're just pictures no text. Where would i get the other ones.

[–] Killer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Voidzilla's most recent video has links in the description https://youtu.be/R7i9KdVTFR4

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 32 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (4 children)

People have been making these same mistakes for literally decades... How does the government not have a 1-click dedicated tool for this yet?

https://slate.com/technology/2016/06/house-democrats-improperly-redacted-documents-wrong-but-they-re-not-alone.html

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Because Elon probably dodged the people who knew their job

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 22 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

You think this was a mistake? Certainly some staffers did this on purpose, my friend. Good for them.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago

There are no heros working on this, any breaks we get are for to incompetence.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

I genuinely can't believe that there's still anybody left who's principled enough and isn't afraid of losing their job (or much, much worse) in retribution.

[–] mambabasa@slrpnk.net 6 points 9 hours ago

They do have such tools. The CIA uses it all the time for their declassifications. This was done on purpose.

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

literally saw this shit in a "complete beginner" CTF challenge years ago

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 240 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Don't underestimate how important this particular screw up is: It means that there's now publicly available proof that they redacted information in a manner that violates the law, and that it can enter the conversation while the Epstein files still have the public attention, rather than months or years later.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 29 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Can't wait for the Supreme Court to decide in 10 years that releasing a document with ineffective redactions means the document was not technically redacted, so no laws were violated.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 13 points 8 hours ago

.... while simultaneously ruling that the information that was supposed to have been redacted can not be used because they say so.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 37 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

We’re founding a committee to oversee discussions about how to consider moving forward with this. Action will be taken at a faster rate than usual compared to usual congressional processes. This legislative action is expected to take place in 2047 once deliberations are complete.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio 42 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That is fucking hilarious, this government doesn't even know how to use a black highlighter correctly.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

It's DIGITAL!

Stuffs hard...

  • the DOJ
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 250 points 20 hours ago (12 children)
[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 129 points 19 hours ago (10 children)

The ultimate hack: Ctrl+C Ctrl+V

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 97 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

How is copying text from a PDF a hack?

I see 2 potential paths to this, possibly both:

  1. Unknowledgeable individuals were tasked with redactions, and didn’t understand adding black bars over documents is closer to a sticky note than a marker.

  2. Knowledgeable individuals taught others to ‘redact’ in this manner to sabotage the effort, and those who signed off on the release didn’t look any further than the rendered result, if they even did that.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 7 hours ago

How is copying text from a PDF a hack?

It isn't, but MAGA is so collectively stupid that they think it is. They probably think turning on a computer is hacking.

[–] El_Scapacabra@lemmy.zip 30 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's like people saying their facebook got hacked when in reality, they logged in on a public computer and didn't log out. Or their password is their kid's name or some shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 31 points 17 hours ago

Adding to theory 2, I bet there was very little record keeping regarding which agent was redacting which document. The point of a coverup is that you try to reduce accountability. Even if only Trump loyalist FBI agents were selected for the censorship job, I doubt they all could remain loyalists after reading the Epstein files.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 118 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I choose to believe that this was done deliberately by disgruntled FBI agents.

It was probably just incompetence, but let me believe what I want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 81 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Someone shouldn’t have blabbed about it so quickly. There are more files to release, and now they will do a better job redacting them.

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 9 hours ago
[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 92 points 19 hours ago

I was gonna say, "Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 110 points 20 hours ago (9 children)

This is what happens when you pull in people that don’t normally do records management. They redact using black highlighter instead of the redaction tool.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 98 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Or, this is what happens when people who work for the government really hate Donald Trump.

Malicious compliance

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 12 points 14 hours ago

You can literally just copy and paste the entire in redacted docs.

load more comments
view more: next ›