this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
241 points (100.0% liked)

News

33724 readers
3986 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Justice Department’s leadership asked career prosecutors in Florida to volunteer over the “next several days” to help redact the Epstein files, in the latest Trump administration push toward releasing the hundreds of thousands of photos, internal memos and other evidence around the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

A supervising prosecutor in the Southern District of Florida’s US Attorney’s Office emailed the entire district office on Tuesday — two days before Christmas — announcing an “emergency request from the [Deputy Attorney General’s] office the SDFL must assist with,” according to a copy of the email reviewed by CNN. “We need AUSAs to do remote document review and redactions related to the Epstein files,” the email said.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MuttMutt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

That's why they are so messed up... using incompetent volunteers with bad instructions. Someone has already un-redacted some of the files.

https://github.com/leedrake5/unredact?tab=readme-ov-file

And someone else gave it a gui

https://github.com/KingBarker/unredactGUI

[–] maccentric@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

I would love to see the instructions on how they are supposed to accomplish this task, exactly what is to be redacted and wh

[–] aesviation@lemmings.world 29 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Literally working overtime to protect pedophiles.

What the fuck is happening, lol.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 hours ago

The US is a racist corpo-fascist state protecting the ruling oligarchs and the population is too passive to do anything about.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 3 hours ago

I'm in Florida, maybe I should volunteer, then do a piss poor job of redacting, so that anyone can remove the redaction and see the original text.

"Oops! Did I do that? Sorry, I was only a volunteer. You get what you pay for."

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 40 points 11 hours ago

The Christmas-week request, from a top career prosecutor in the US Attorney’s Office, attempts to entice volunteer attorneys to work on the files now, in exchange for days off later.

Guys, they'll even throw in a pizza party.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 75 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm kind of getting the feeling that a few insiders in the DOJ are repulsed by this pedo shit and not doing a thorough job on purpose

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 40 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

That would be ideal, but let's be real... Everyone who sees those files have been handpicked by a team of DOJ dirt diggers and psychologists.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

They would have selected a group of Trump loyalist to do their redactions. However it would be very hard to guarantee that every censor would remain a loyalist after reading "and then Trump had sex with the child" for 8 hours every day.

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 23 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Idk... that takes way more effort and foresight than what has been demonstrated by this administration so far.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Anything for their fuhrer.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 7 points 13 hours ago

This is most likely the case

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 13 hours ago

We can only hope.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 44 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Come spend your Christmas covering up Donald’s kiddy diddling instead of celebrating with your family.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 10 points 6 hours ago

*now without pay!

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

lol

lmao, even

Edit: this is clearly an exercise in getting loyalists to go on the record. This is wild.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 28 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 39 points 13 hours ago

"I couldn't find a sharpie, so I used a highlighter."

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That doesn't sound like volunteering to me:

the SDFL must assist with

[–] JollyBrancher@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago

But it's just a "request," right?!

[–] kelpie_returns@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago

Clown-ass mfs

[–] JollyBrancher@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Hot take(?): If you're willing to do extra, unpaid work for free - partisanship aside - should you be allowed to do this at all in any non-elected/appointed, bureaucratic job? Especially with a "request," with the descriptor of "emergency," before it? Breaks my heart. *Edited to correct grammar