this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
-10 points (40.7% liked)

News

33832 readers
2440 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You like the dash?

—OwO—

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 19 hours ago

"You are 10 minutes late!!!😡😡"

"You have to do unpaid overtime to hit the shareholders kpi 🥰"

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

the date you were born does not create a valid grouping for behavior analysis . this simplistic phony bs needs to stop.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You can look at people born between dates X and Y and ask them questions then ask the same questions to people born between dates Y and Z and then compare. That's all this article did.

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world -1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

you could do the same for race , sex, eye color, people who wear flip flops. If its not repeatable then its really drivel.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It sounds like your real issue is with how social sciences work and not the contents of this article.

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

My real issue is with false and misleading information.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

What is misleading? They asked a whole lot of people a simple question then reported the results back. This is hard data that is analyzable.

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The sample size is such a small percentage to the group size it can not be conclusive on any level. A quick estimation - Gen Z could account for over 1.2 billion people. The sample in the article is 1000 British people which is 0.0000833%

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Now I see that your issue is really with statistics.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

Baby boomer bosses are all going to die soon anyways

[–] EditsHisComments@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This is horseshit. Boomers may be more strict about being there at a certain time, but they don't give two shits if you come in early or stay late.

I can't tell you how many times I or my Gen-Z coworkers would stay an extra 2-3hrs (or I would come in early) and none of that even mattered the day we come in a little late. Any other bosses and it's no issue, but fucking boomers seem to care more about being at work at a certain time rather than how much anyone actually works.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Correct. They're fixated on schedules without an ounce of concern for productivity. I wish they would all retire already. They fucking suck.

[–] Cnote5@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

I believe they were potty trained at gun point.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Also being in a physical location is super important to them for some reason even if it has no effect on the work being done.

They want the appearance of work more than the actual work. Being in a location is work for them

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 10 points 20 hours ago

A significant reason is they believe that since they had to suffer through it, so should you.

See also: student loans, cancer treatments

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Earlier this year, the Oscar-winning actress Jodie Foster grumbled over her Gen Zers coworkers not showing up on the job until 10:30 a.m. Meanwhile, an MIT interviewer blasted the generation for always “being late.”

Plus, research shows that Gen Z’s flexibility with timing transcends the meeting room: They are more likely to miss deadlines than any other generation.

On average, Gen Z workers miss almost a quarter of their deadlines each week, compared to 6% for baby boomers and 10% for Gen X.

At the same time, young workers spend the most time on unnecessary tasks and pulling overtime.

[–] ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 21 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Did they consider that the workload has increased and due dates and pay has not? Everywhere is "understaffed" that is a choice by the company. The extra work is divided among the existing employees, thus making it more difficult and unrewarding to hit these deadlines. I say meh.

[–] PurpleFanatic@quokk.au 8 points 23 hours ago

Shhh!! Stop drawing attention to the systemic problem that’s causing these statistics! Young people bad! 

[–] alternategait@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

I also wonder if there's more work that has deadlines at the level Gen Z is working at, and fewer at the level Boomers are working at. Or if there are tighter turn arounds? Like from my wife's work, I'd guess the upper levels are on more quarterly "release" schedules while everyone else is working these 2 week sprints which by the nature of the work requires some things to take more than one sprint (which looks like missing a deadline to the tracking).