this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
391 points (99.2% liked)

News

36439 readers
2478 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 125 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was not, the chain of custody was laughable, it should be completely inadmissible

[–] MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yeah the officer that transported the backpack actually turned off her camera for 15 minutes, against regulations.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's possible that she was so excited that she forgot that this is not a normal case, and would have additional scrutiny.

It makes me wonder how many innocent people are framed and convicted.

[–] Kaz@lemmy.org 1 points 1 month ago

There is plenty of docos around how the US police seem to be so keen to close cases they just pin it on disabled people.

It's pathetic and shameful...

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 106 points 1 month ago

This was peak performative policing and probably illegal behind the scenes tactics. And it’s going to cost them their case I hope. 

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 78 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Luigi Mangione? You mean the guy that was sleeping on my couch in December of 2023? Why are they picking on this guy? He wasn't even there.

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

2023? He was on my couch in 2024.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's what I meant, he was definitely on my couch in 2024.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He was on ALL our couches on that blessed day!

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I heard he was out feeding orphans and adopting elderly dogs.

[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I heard he was out building homes for the homeless and raising money for child cancer research.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I heard he was fixing bugs in the Civ 6 UI

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

So that's how he earned his sainthood!

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I wish, mine got JD Vanced

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's weird Luigi was inside of me all of 2024

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's so wild. Anyway I was in NYC that morning and I know for a fact that Luigi couldn't have assassinated the CEO because actually I saw my friend do it. My very close friend who I'd recognize anywhere. So it definitely wasn't Luigi

[–] sudo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago

Well he couldn't have 'assassinated' anybody, because nobody was 'assassinated' anyway.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Wait that was your couch?

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago (2 children)

To add to what others have said regarding chain of custody and illegal procedure: just look at that face!

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If you would hit, you must acquit

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 12 points 1 month ago

I'm glad that logic didn't hold up for Bundy.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago

I'm gonna get downvoted to the other side of the planet for this... but I think that Leavitt, in stills, not spewing vile shit from her scroteholster, and completely disassociated from reality... is quite attractive. That said, she goes up against the wall with the rest of them when the time comes. Don't let a pretty face skew your judgement.

Or give cops the benefit of the doubt. Luigi didn't do shit, the evidence was planted and it's plainly obvious.

[–] gray@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How can he still look so good with all that stress??

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because he knows he's innocent, I'm guessing. The CEO dude shot himself. Everyone is saying it.

[–] gray@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Yea, I have heard that too!

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I have very little expectation that Luigi is going to get off, much less have his death penalty overturned. At least not anytime soon.

Our highest judicial branch is compromised and serve capital, the same people that Luigi targeted. They HAVE to make an example of him, and law and constitution be damned. They've already demonstrated they don't give two fucks about process and law, which should make us all VERY motivated to topple this regime.

All jokes and memes aside, we literally don't know if it even was Luigi Mangione, for all we know they really did plant a gun on him because they got some tip that the actual killer made it out of the country. They have been breaking the law and covering up crimes since their first administration, any of us are in danger of being a convenient scapegoat for Cash "Crazy Eyes" Patel to plant a stripper clip in our backpack with "TRUMP BAD" hastily written on the shells in sharpie.

But if some measure of sanity is restored to the country, it's highly likely that Luigi will get a new trial at the very least.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

Unless there's a complete abandonment of our laws (unfortunately possible) no court can do anything if a jury finds him not guilty

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 24 points 1 month ago

There are so many problems with this case that it seems impossible to win, especially since it seems like an excellent candidate for jury nullification.

Curious how he's in custody for his murder trial, yet a certain ICEhole isn't ...

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Spoiler: T'weren't