this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
324 points (100.0% liked)

news

420 readers
235 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 148 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Make court justice unreliable and folks will simply resort to street justice.

[–] RaoulDuke85@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

Seems to be the obvious choice every day.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why would they charge the Gestapo officer for following The Party Directives?

If anyone thinks he'll face charges at federal level, they're delusional.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

LegalEagle has a video breaking down the video and discussing the laws pertaining to this. https://youtu.be/7AQbhes-Ntw

[–] Bischmeister@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

This was a good video 🙂

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Vigilante justice could be a good option.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

I support this

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why dont we try "One of Us, All of Your's" then? Like Noem touts on her fucken podiums.

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think she’s trying to chant “one of us gobble gobble” like the rest of the circus freaks.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was just printed on her podium. Doesnt matter where it comes from. Nasty shit coming from the head of a powerful institution. Maybe it was a bad move leaving those laying around.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it's important to remember that that quote LITERALLY comes from Nazi Germany.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No it doesnt, not verbatim. It may capture Nazi ethos and actions but it is not a direct quote from what I can dig up. A similar spanish quote was apparently used by Spanish fascists in the 1930s, "Uno de los nuestros vale por todos los vuestros", which is pretty much the same thing. But the factoid everyone seems to be passing around about an SS Officer being killed is incorrect.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well shit. Color me surprised, the internet lied to me.

That's said, if that's how they feel, I will agree. We will do the same. Every fascist must be removed from the earth.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Here's a historical analysis of the question I thought was interesting. Even though the idea that the Nazis coined the specific phrase is baseless, they did threaten and practice that sort of retaliation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hector@lemmy.today 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The state will have to file if the attorneys want to be re elected.

They talk about investigating, there is nothing to investigate we have multiple videos. The only thing to investigate is the law and how it plays out with the federal agent in a state.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

The state will have to file if the attorneys want to be re elected.

Never mind reelection; they need to file if they want to continue to exist in society at all. That point needs to be impressed upon them, emphatically.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Federal agencies murdering Americans with total impunity.

Brought to you by every single conservative you know.

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Always been this way. Say whatever you want about Waco (I fucking hate cults and any fundamentalist religion, so this is no support for the cult) and Ruby Ridge but those are just two examples.

Obama calling a drone strike on a US Citizen's wedding in Yemen, the CIA killing probably thousands of Americans but we only know of a few dozen declassified, Kent shooting, and a few more.

It's just more visible now. Sorry if you've seen this line before but it's so true: fascism is imperialism turning inwards. And that inward turning is not only onto domestic operations but also in relation to the "ingroup". Black people being killed for decades (even excluding lynchings) has been ignored by the general population but now, that same hatred and cruelty is being applied to everyone else. The ingroup just got a WHOLE lot smaller.

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And allowed by every democrat. All they do is either issue "slamming" statements or resign - "fuck it, not gonna deal with this".

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 12 points 1 week ago

As far as I know no charges have happened for the franklin park guy that was murdered by them or the woman filled full of holes or the recent couple that was shot. I seriously don't get trumps supporters.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

We’re all the frog in the pot.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Federal charges were never on the table with this MAGA administration.

State charges are still a possibility.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Federal charges. Which, like duh. He's going to be charged by the state, though

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What’s the statute of limitations? It does not matter how long it takes this murderer will pay for his crimes

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 15 points 1 week ago

There is no statute of limitations on murder.

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And this sets precedent and sends a message to all ICE that they can just shoot innocent civilians in the face with no consequences.

Welcome to the new FSA - Fascist States of America!

All hail the land of the pedophile fascists! 🫡

Maybe Americans should do another protest march, that will surely make Trump think twice... whether he should make an AI vid of him pissing or shitting on all of the Americans.

Also make sure to dress up as inflatable Pokémons, because that really portrays how unsatisfied and serious you all are.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Criminal charges is the compromise we're offering. If they won't agree to that, if those are the rules they wanna play by, there's no reason not to shoot ICE agents on sight.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Every state and local official who fails to prosecute is also guilty and should be dealt with accordingly.

They need to be scared not to do their job.

[–] AlreadyDefederated@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What about a civil suit?

Maybe her family could make him and his family poor for life.

It doesn't substitute for Ms. Good's life in any way, but it does a mote of justice.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

We could burn his house down

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am shocked. You mean the legal system and government will do literally fucking nothing. That is unimaginable.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They didn't do nothing.

They raised the murderer's home to hide evidence. They spoke to police unions. They increased their presence in Minneapolis. They are now going door to door while blocking entire streets.

They have, and will continue to do a lot about this.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Has anyone doxxed this piece of shit yet?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

His bosses did

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

I believe the precedented standard is time-off with pay. /s

[–] Kayday@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I read that it's largely due to established precedent that in cases where a police officer shoots a driver, (happens enough for there to be precedent) the burden of proof is to show beyond a reasonable doubt that the killer did not have cause to fear for their life. Proving something to not be the case is very difficult.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 22 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Lucky for us we have the whole thing from multiple angles, including the murderers POV because he whipped out his phone because he wanted a video of the murder that he premeditated.

It's a high bar, but this is one of the most documented murders in history.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think thats true.

He violated official policy, and it's obvious to anyone with half a brain that forcing a driver to slam on the accelerator (due to being dead) can only make the situation worse.

I don't think he'll face charges, but I'm wary of what you remember reading somewhere.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 13 points 1 week ago

He literally had gotten video of her license plate prior to shooting her. He had no need to put himself in front of her car while other officers were screaming at her to drive away. They could have gone after her later, as is typically done with anyone not considered seriously dangerous that is operating a vehicle, but he chose to get in front of her and start shooting when she complied with the order to drive away

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe the first shot. The two through the driver's window make it murder.

[–] lorski@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

STATE charges - LFG!

load more comments
view more: next ›