this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
475 points (97.8% liked)

Reddit

14679 readers
4 users here now

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The search autocompletes almost every other recent term I used. It's not a recency issue.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 93 points 4 days ago (3 children)

In defense of Reddit (yuck), if there's been one constant in all the years of its existence, it's been that their search is the worst. Not saying it's not intentional, cause it probably is, but damn if they've not worked hard to establish plausible deniability.

[–] bitflag@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's entirely possible the index for type-ahead search is not refreshed all the time but every day or week, which means it'll lag on words that weren't in the news a day ago

Yes this makes total sense for a site like reddit where topical elements trend..

Have to agree. Always has and will be ass.

[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

I checked other (non-political) recent keywords and it seems to be doing ok.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

And fuck spez

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 34 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

On any other search engine:

site:reddit.com alex pretti
[–] ChristchurchAsshole@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Good old advanced search + operators!

[–] Slashme@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Works for me...

I'm hardly ever on Reddit anymore because Lemmy is so much better, but this isn't a Reddit issue.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah; it just didnt refresh to the latest searches

Can't pronounce Reddit without Edit

[–] rottenmummy@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It is not far fetched but how do we know for sure it is intentional?

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 51 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We no longer live in a world where we can automatically assume idiocy over malice.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

the saying was always ended with "but don't rule out malice"

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Accuse them of it being intentional and you might get an answer.

Give them excuses and you never will.

Also its intentional.

[–] sousmerde_rtrdataire@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"Ineligible for recommendation". Turns out that freedom of speech was when TikTok was Chinese.
1000015850

To be entirely honest, i don't know what our "values" are anymore.


That's the normal thought now, and not "At least compared to our declared current enemies, you're allowed to criticize our government without consequences" :
1000015852

In a speech of 355 b.c., Demosthenes rightly remarks that the most important difference between the political systems of Athens and Sparta is that at Athens it is permitted to praise that of Sparta and denigrate one’s own, whereas at Sparta no one may praise any system other than the Spartan. (Dem.20,§106)

That's the basis of freedom, and once we lose that, what are we left with ?
A bourgeois "democracy" where medias are owned by the capitalists and citizens-owned medias are increasingly threatened of disinformation ? When you're choosing the least bad and are surrendering your power to elected people that often decide in private, and almost never once through referendums.
A rule of law with many lawfare cases proving a lack of independence from the government ? Where money can buy good lawyers, and blue-collar crimes are treated way harsher for the same sum of money stolen than white-collar crimes ? And the latter is even legalized under fiscal "optimization", and laws promoted by their lobbying.

Without painting other countries as even worse, what values are we left with ?
I literally have hundreds of such examples : https://x.com/i/status/2012799140061659566
That is even more shocking than censorship : https://x.com/i/status/2014796564624253394
And many dozens of journalists because they were supporting Russia https://x.com/i/status/2014655503616405681
And our "leaders" don't seem to realize that critizing ourselves is the basis of our system(, and that unlike countries victims of our attacks we don't even have such excuses) : https://x.com/i/status/2012724357072892409
The e.u., u.k., and Australia, are multiplying laws restricting what they're deeming illegal speech. They already proved their intent with covid, and are even acknowledging that it'd be a dictatorship if they directly regulated social media posts(, but since it'll be indirectly through proxy organizations such as EUvsDisinfo instead of WarOnFakes, then it's all right 🙄).

[–] eattherich@feddit.online 4 points 3 days ago

"Manufactured consent, not just for CBS anymore!"

--Reddit

[–] baconmonsta@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago

I can't reproduce this. Maybe it's something at your end?

load more comments
view more: next ›