this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
432 points (99.3% liked)

politics

27531 readers
3660 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

But obviously not for registered Republicans.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 16 minutes ago
[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 2 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

This will most probably will be 'limited' gun control. Limited as in 'everyone left oft the GOP is a domestic terrorist'.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

Didn't Hitler do something like that?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Now I really wonder how maga will react... This is one of their core beliefs and either cheeto goes full "rules for thee but not for mer" for the white christians, or he might literally find himself without a base at all

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Maga core beliefs go out the window the minute trump says something different. Remember how they were against miltary intervention in foreign countries, especially in the middle east? Well now they're gung-ho for it. They're singing that Barbara Ann/bomnb Iran song on the conservative forums right now. There's a little grumbling from a few of them about trump and minions saying you can't take your guns to protests, but most are already rationalizing it (because it's the 'libtards' getting shot for it). Pretty soon they'll all be cheering on the Big Beautiful Gun Roundup.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 34 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

So let's see, no Epstein Files, America First is out the window, prices keep rising, and now we're going to restrict the 2nd Amendment.

What exactly is MAGA in for now? The voracious Corruption? The virtuosic incompetence? The Pedophilia? Death Squads spontaneously forming firing squads and executing American citizens in the streets?

Does this look like the kind of freedom you were voting for?

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

All that winning must be getting tiring.

[–] nuggsy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago

Free-dumb isn't free.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 36 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Settle down people. This isn't what you think it is.

They're using this as an explanation of why Pretti was executed.

They're not suggesting that MAGA dickheads cant carry guns.

While irreconcilable to any thinking person. These two statements can happily co-exist in the minds of idiots.

This whole thing is "rules for thee but not for me".

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

They’re using this as an explanation of why Pretti was executed.

Yeah, and they're saying they should be restricted, moreso than they are. That's not the traditional conservative position.

They're not suggesting liberals can't carry guns either. They're saying neither should carry a gun to a protest.

It's a bizarre position.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

I'll never forget the surprised Pikachu faces on all of those armed MAGA chuds on January 6th when one of them actually got shot.

[–] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 hours ago

Republicans with the mask off

[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 53 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

They are clearly trying to ensure that they will never be subject to a legitimate election again. Minnesota is a test for how many constitutional amendments they can break. Presidential term limits are absolutely the target. When the oligarchs no longer need their cult they will repeal the entire Constitution. Welcome to the New Confederacy.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Trump is nearing his life's term limit. A 3rd term from him personally is not particularly concerning. That's still a red line in the sand that we should never allow anyone to cross but I'll be surprised if he makes it through his current term in good enough condition to even pretend to be in charge.

[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Trump is just a symptom. The christofascists in his ear are the sickness. Trump is there just to bulldoze through the Constitution and establish a one party system.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

No, Trump is the entire movement. No one else even remotely comes close. It's a personality cult.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 9 points 13 hours ago

Who needs term limits when the term just doesn't end

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bfg9k@lemmy.world 186 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Oh NOW it's a conversation they're willing to have. Not after 20 years of school shootings.

Fucking hypocrite cunts.

[–] Cruel@programming.dev 1 points 2 minutes ago

Nobody is having that conversation because of a comment Trump made. Literally no change to gun rights is being proposed or even suggested.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 46 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The NRA and gun rights groups have condemned Trump's rhetoric.

Seems like it's just the UltraMAGA typical bootlickers that are rolling over for Trump.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 21 points 13 hours ago

Anything that fractures the republican base is a plus

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

Hey guys, I think I heard dingo here say he wants the Epstein files released in full. Let's do him that favor. Long overdo.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 120 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (13 children)

Hahaha children are shot in the face. Who cares. A white man packing a concealed weapon is murdered by ICE. Oh noes we must have gun control!

Get the fuck out of here.

Edit: I'm laughing incredulously because the situation is so fucked.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

And that white man didnt even USE his gun. So fucking funny.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 22 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

It's about the feeling of safety. I mean could you imagine how terrifying it must feel just walking around a school, dragging a kicking and screaming 10 year old out and think to yourself... what if one of these kids has a gun and starts shooting! We all see it on the news every day... but it's so much easier to watch when it's just little kids trying to get about their day getting shot. It hits so much harder when it's 30 year old trained gunmen that might have to face being in the line of fire.

Or walking down the street just minding your business spraying pepper spray in peoples faces, and think to yourself, what if someone in this crowd has a gun. I'm only wearing 3 layers of body armor, and I've only got 15 friends around also armed with large assault rifles, gas masks, and tear gas to protect myself, maybe one person in this crowd, might have a weapon somewhere, and might even think about using it.

Or imagine the fear they feel every time they burst down someones door, with only 10 other soldiers, and a mere inches of riot shield in front of them to protect them from these people that have a small chance of owning a firearm somewhere in the house, these brave souls need protection!

I can't imagine what it's like to live in that kind of fear.

[–] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 7 points 14 hours ago

I think Uvalde answered that for us.

[–] iz_ok@sh.itjust.works 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I think this is more intended to remove the citizen population's ability to retaliate against a tyrannical government. You know the thing the second amendment was intended for, according to some folks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZeroPoke@fedia.io 13 points 16 hours ago

This isnt new from him. He said take the guns back in like 2018 "Take the guns first, go through due process second"
https://www.c-span.org/clip/white-house-event/user-clip-donald-trump-take-the-guns-first-go-through-due-process-second/4717030

2A still voted for him tho shrugs Something something libs take our guns.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

A wise man knows that you can still finish the race by walking backwards

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 79 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

California's strict gun control started with Reagan because he wanted to disarm the Black Panthers. Republicans are pro 2A, as long as it is reserved for white conservative/fascist people.

EDIT: Governor Reagan. So, before he became president, but 100 fold once he got shot.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

Surprised that wasn't made today

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

We do need gun control. For ICE. Those criminals should not be armed.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 52 points 16 hours ago

Will Trump be the one who solves the gun problem in the US?

Nope, because it will be, "Gun for me, not for thee."

[–] RainbowHedgehog@lemmy.world 35 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Just like when gun control was brought to California when the Black Panthers open carried.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org 20 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

He just wants ICE, Fascists, 2A-toters and white rednecks to be armed.

He doesn't want blacks, LGBTQ and enemies of the government to be armed.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 9 points 15 hours ago

Well he can't do a fascism if those people are armed!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

From the guy that defended Rittenhouse’s gun as a tool of “self defense.”

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 17 points 16 hours ago
[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 20 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

Oh now the ‘tHeY gUn GiT yEr GuNz’ asshat cares about gun control? How long till political affiliation counts as reason to revoke gun permits?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 11 points 15 hours ago

"Don't Tread On Me" bros warming up, stretching, hydrating, preparing to stoop the lowest they have ever stooped to lick Trump's boots as he ramps up his attacks on the Second Amendment

Best part of this article.

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago

Whaaaaaaaat! The guy who said "Take the guns first, go through due process second" is suggesting they take your guns? Its almost like he says what he is going to do before he does it, Im sure absolutely no one saw this coming.

load more comments
view more: next ›