this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
523 points (98.5% liked)

World News

52630 readers
2418 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When Sir Tim Berners-Lee invented the world wide web in 1989, his vision was clear: it would used by everyone, filled with everything and, crucially, it would be free.

Today, the British computer scientist’s creation is regularly used by 5.5 billion people – and bears little resemblance to the democratic force for humanity he intended.

In Australia to promote his book, This is for Everyone, Berners-Lee is reflecting on what his invention has become – and how he and a community of collaborators can put the power of the web back into the hands of its users.

Berners-Lee describes his excitement in the earliest years of the web as “uncontainable”. Approaching 40 years on, a rebellion is brewing among himself and a community of like-minded activists and developers.

“We can fix the internet … It’s not too late,” he writes, describing his mission as a “battle for the soul of the web”.

Berners-Lee traces the first corruption of the web to the commercialisation of the domain name system, which he believes would have served web users better had it been managed by a nonprofit in the public interest. Instead, he says, in the 1990s the .com space was pounced on by “charlatans”.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 47 minutes ago

I'd give anything for the internet to go back to how it was in the early/mid 90s.

Back before it was corporatized, monetized and before all the gardens started building their walls.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Talk to Mark Andreesen.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

“The internet” should just be dumb pipes that transport bits. Period.

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

A series of tubes, if you will. Not a big truck.

[–] CanadaPlus 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't know, the thing about the internet is that it does bring a ton of value, and operating it does have costs in turn. Maybe Sir Tim is right about DNS being the point where it got commercial, but it was going to happen somehow. Arxiv and Wikipedia still exist, but how do you do Amazon non-commercially? Even YouTube is a challenge.

There used to be a sort of mantra that technology was neutral and people are good and bad. But actually, that’s not true of things on the web

Arguably, that's not the distinction. Technologies can be explicitly of control or of chaos. And then that relative structure or freedom can itself be used for good or for evil.

A central platform is of control, Lemmy or Linux is of chaos. And obviously we lean towards the latter a lot, but for some things, even Lemmy wants central control and monitoring, so it's not evil, exactly.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I would make a somewhat controversial case that one of the main ruiners of the internet and our entire social contract has been the "free with marketing" model that replaced subscriptions.

If we're going to live in a goods/services/money climate, I'm fine with different companies or media distributors charging subscription fees to pay for their costs. It makes sense, it's been a working model since the early days of the internet.

What started to become a problem is when more and more services went to "free" models. Now the revenue comes from advertisers, so that comes with a train of baggage. Now producers of content are incentivized to make everything a race to see who gets user attention first and fastest for those sweet, sweet clicks. It is the main contributing factor to public attention-span erosion and the way most people have become willfully ignorant about the outside world. Additionally, content has to be moderated and censored because we wouldn't want to scare off the precious advertisers. It's enough to make you want to roblox yourself in minecraft.

Imagine if Youtube broadly was a paid service. You pay premium and there's no algorithm. No "feed based on your marketing preferences." No 20-mile long list of AI slop videos with sensational titles to get you to click on them, because the creators aren't making money from clicks but real subscribers who want to see more of the actual content.

Same with many other huge media sites, even social media. If they weren't beholdened to attention-spans and sensationalism, we would see far less outright propaganda and lies.

I feel like this model has ruined a lot of gaming too, and has allowed publishers to release shitty, unfinished games for free with no moderation for MMO's and no real care or passion for making a game people want to come back to, and instead just make slop games with skins for impulse shoppers.

[–] rav3n@ttrpg.network 10 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

"The internet should be for everyone, except the people I don't like." - average modern internet user

Glad he's able to call out the domain name system for the crock of shit that it is.

[–] JATtho@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

It's always the fucking DNS. .__.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 12 hours ago

The internet isn't broken... Humanity is.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 26 points 19 hours ago

*web inventor

[–] darkpanda@lemmy.ca 103 points 1 day ago (29 children)

They kind of fix this in the lede, but dude did not invent the internet, he invented the World Wide Web. The internet is a superset of a whole bunch of things that includes the World Wide Web, but dude wasn’t out there inventing TCP/IP and routers and whatnot.

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

People say wifi when they mean the Internet, somehow one cannot expect accuracy. Articles always get written by professional clueless people also.

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›