Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
While Judge Schiltz, a conservative jurist appointed by President George W. Bush, let Mr. Lyons off the hook for the moment, he cautioned that he might change his mind and order him to appear again to answer questions if ICE continues to violate court orders.
So this is even less than just words. It's allowing it to continue.
You had one job.
And he performed it "admirably".
Oh were you expecting a conservative jurist appointed by President George W. Bush to do differently?
I mean, that was the term of the original order in this specific case. Either actually release the guy there is a court order to release or have the acting director show up in person to defend against contempt charges. They released the guy, so there aren't going to be contempt charges yet.
And they BETTER Not make it 101 because after 102 he MIGHT start thinking about a STERN LETTER for that 104th Time they violate the Court's Orders 105 times!*
*Freedom DOESNT Apply to poors!
So what? What are you gonna do about it? They have the guns, violence, and federal power. What are you gonna do huh? Pussies.
Let's see some actual backbone (I know we won't).
Yeah I don't think we're gonna be able to litigate the Nazis off the beaches of Normandy.
Rule of law, huh?
It's almost like something straight out of the Nazis' playbook back in Germany: seizing power by abusing the law. Hitler first made use of the so‑called "Reichstag Fire Decree" to undermine fundamental rights and launch a campaign of terror - using violence, mass arrests and intimidation to eliminate political opponents; at least formally, these measures were covered by law.
Subsequently, these and all other heinous crimes committed by the Nazis were rapidly enshrined in legal form, backed by police force and intimidation - for example the "Enabling Act," which stripped parliament of its powers and allowed the cabinet (in practice controlled by Hitler) to enact laws, even contrary to the constitution.
Overall, it was a takeover that used and even created the appearance of constitutionality, in which the Nazis interpreted and applied the law at their own discretion and enforced it with violence and intimidation. The rest is history.
When I look at the US news since January last year, it all seems very familiar - with a rather insignificant difference being that instead of the Reichstag fire, another staged "emergency," namely illegal immigration, is being used as a pretext to undermine civil rights...
Ok so how about you make the population of Minnesota sheriff's or whatever the fuck you want to call it.
Y'all keep taking but no action is being taken. There are so many vets that are ready to go and defend this country from this fascist regime including myself.
Deputization
The judicial needs a police agency that is 100% separate from the executive and administrative.
The US Marshals Service serves the judiciary. Unfortunately, they're directed by the Attorney General which is a role currently occupied by a loyalist.
Yeah so they don't report to the judiciary, they're part of the executive branch.
And if the Marshals fail to accomplish or carry out the judiciary's orders, the judiciary can deputize anyone to do so.
Yeah. The loophole is how they get away with it.
I believe this is how the Klan operated, back in the day
That exists but these Republican judges are refusing to uphold the law.
Making laws and passing judgement means nothing in a society where the enforcement of those laws and judgements is non-existent (at best).
Like immigration laws? There has always been selective enforcement.
there's always been selective enforcement of all laws, seperate rules for the rich and the poors
Yeah that's one criteria for selective enforcement, but lately it's also been happening along political party lines.
Right, I was trying to get around the paywall.
Put the original as the post link, and the paywall bypass in the body.
Fixed
https://www.cathinfo.com/computers-and-technology/fbi-tries-to-unmask-owner-of-infamous-archive-is-site/ not sure what jurisdiction you're in or if this may be of concern to you.
Violating laws? That's how Republicans roll. It's their M.O. Their Hallmark. They will never be able to change their spots. Fool Republicans a thousand time, they cry, fool me more. It's all about the rich scooping up the lucre while bamboozling their base.
Do they get a prize at 100? That must be what they think happens right?
