this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
601 points (98.2% liked)

Videos

17520 readers
960 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed
  9. AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

She was saved by the police.

Source: Minnesota Public Radio

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anzo@programming.dev 13 points 10 hours ago

I reckon she didn't have a bazooka. No 2nd amendmente of course. This is the land of the free (violence), after all.. what's the news? /s ...

[–] n0respect@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

Remember:

1] The US public has no right to film ICE (per the DOJ). 2] ICE has complete immunity, and you have no due process. 3] ICE hates cameras.

4] therefore, it's illegal to film ICE. (do it anyway)

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You have a constitutional right to film from a safe distance while on public land like sidewalks, etc. ICE is breaking the law wholesale by targeting citizens exercising their 1st Amendment rights.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

ICE is breaking the law wholesale by targeting citizens exercising their 1st Amendment rights

Yes, you're in the right, and ICE is in the wrong, and keep filming them, just know that being right isn't always healthy.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Remember: Filming ICE is the peaceful alternative.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

If you start a line with "1. " (as in: one period space) then it'll be treated like a numbered list. You don't have to increment the number, just keep using 1.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If you do illegal things, you’ll put put into the criminal category they want to put you into anyway. Resisting qualifies you as criminal as well.

So there is no incentive to comply.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

According to the bootlicking chodes I've argued with recently, just existing anywhere near ICE performing their kidnapping operations is obstruction.

Apparently getting shot in the back 10 times is excusable if you were somehow preventing ICE from disappearing people by standing on a public sidewalk. It's total psychopath abuser mentality.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 28 points 14 hours ago

Treat them like crimminals is a good long term strategy where law enforcment works for its citizens.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 157 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Jumping out with guns drawn. This looks like a gang robbery.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 74 points 20 hours ago

The way they whipped up and piled out I 100% thought they were about to carjack someone.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 191 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

The woman’s husband eventually arrives and tries to intervene, and he made a separate recording of the interaction on his phone. He tells the agents not to search her car because they don't have a warrant and it would be an illegal search. The agents appear dismissive of his constitutional concerns.

"I'm not getting into the legality of everything," one agent responds tersely.

MPR News interviewed the woman and her husband, who also doesn't want to be identified, fearing retaliation.

The woman said the agents put her into one of their vehicles and started driving toward the Twin Cities, presumably to the Whipple Federal Building near MSP Airport, where ICE has an immigration detention facility. About 20 minutes into the drive, when they were near Le Sueur, she says one of the agents got a call, apparently from an ICE supervisor. They turned off Highway 169 at the next exit and drove back toward St. Peter.

The husband told MPR News that after his wife was taken into custody, he called his attorney, and soon after, he got a call from St. Peter Chief of Police Matt Grochow, whom he said he has known for years.

Bolded above.

Observations:

  1. They execute a high-speed box stop which is dangerous to not just the innocent observer, but bystanders, all while there is zero evidence of any illegal conduct happening.

  2. From the recording they all had guns drawn and pointed from the moment they stepped out of the car, meaning there was no escalation - they emerged ready to use deadly force without any grounds or justification. The only explanation is intent to kill or unlawfully intimidate.

  3. Those thugs were potentially driving her to be flown out of Minnesota. After that, who knows. They were informed of the unconstitutionality of an illegal search and demonstrated they didn't care.

  4. The only reason she was saved was that the husband knew the local chief of police, which - while great and especially nice for local communities where this is more common - is certainly not going to apply to everyone.

In any normal timeline they would all be fired and potentially be the basis for a constitutional rights violation suit for multiple reasons above.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 112 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (16 children)

At this rate, we're going to literally have ICE agents hanging from lamp posts soon enough.

And frankly, anyone still saying, "but they'll use that as an excuse to escalate," can shove it up their ass.

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

I hope so. I don't think Americans have the gumption to stand up for themselves though.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 55 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (4 children)

Escalate to where? They are already executing US citizens in the street who haven't done anything remotely illegal?

And not even receiving fake punishments to try and reassure the public that's not what is actually happening.

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Escalate to where?

Tiananmen Square style massacre. Oligarchs saw that in 89 and thought, gee I'd like to do that in America and put the little people in their place.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Escalate to where?

I get the sentiment, but there's always a way to escalate. Right now these cop school rejects are driving rented civilian vehicles, using ordinary cop weapons. Start actually posing a threat and you'll see the bozos drive APCs. Start using molotovs on their APCs, and ICE will get armed drones and even more twitchy trigger fingers on larger weapons.

I'm not arguing that you shouldn't fight back, but governments rely on having a violence monopoly. If you threaten that monopoly, then the government will use more force.

[–] guy@piefed.social 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm not saying roll over. Just be prepared for your opponent escalating and to keep fighting. Because if you take a couple of potshots at ICE, and then give up when the going gets tough, then you'd might as well have rolled over to begin with.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] n0respect@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

At this rate, we'll be forced to house ICE agents. I really think they'll try.

[–] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

The 3rd amendment is one of the last parts of the bill of rights that hasn't been shit on. So it's only a matter of time.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 73 points 19 hours ago

Thats a fucking gang attempting kidnapping

[–] ulkesh@piefed.social 31 points 16 hours ago

The piece of shit Trump wants a civil war. This is how he will get it. Fuck ICE. Fuck Trump. And FUCK everyone who wants this.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 54 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

If I am boxed in by a car with no police lights with masked men jumping out and immediately pointing guns at me..... Floor it. This is self defense because I have no way of knowing who is threatening my life. With guns drawn you can't see POLICE on the vests either.

I would prefer that and deal with the aftermath after.

[–] AndrewInATree@piefed.ca 21 points 14 hours ago

I mean, they jumped out with guns drawn. There was really no chance to move the car at that point and survive. They did it to Renee Good. They'll do it again.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 52 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

The aftermath might be you're dead... but eventually this is going to happen and they will survive and it's going to go to court. I would love to see the precedent get set that it was indeed self defense.

This masked non identifying shit is insane.

Sounds like a case of in for a penny in for a pound. Don't let kidnappers take you to point b.

[–] breezeblock@lemmy.ca 81 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Look at that terrible technique — swerving dangerously. They are untrained clowns being prepared to become trumps personal militia.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 50 points 21 hours ago

How about pointing all their guns at the driver then assaulting her physically? That's also terrible technique.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 55 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Something to remember about situations like this where time is of the essence, don't just yell "Someone call 911/for help!" Actually DESIGNATE someone from the crowd to do so. The bystander effect assumes that someone else will do it. Don't let people think like that. While doing CPR, you're told to point specifically at someone to call for assistance. Same goes for something like this.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 34 points 20 hours ago

I won't be impressed until police officers start actually arresting these fake "federal agents" when they assault someone. Put the fear of the actual law in these lawless motherfuckers.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 46 points 21 hours ago (8 children)

Police are Allowed to Protect people AGAINST ICE?

[–] breadleyloafsyou@lemmy.zip 5 points 14 hours ago

They'll only do it if they are friends. Husband said in an article that he has known the chief of police for years.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›