this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
529 points (99.3% liked)

Selfhosted

55898 readers
365 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Samsung Smart TV owners can now use Jellyfin natively, as the open-source media server is now available on the Tizen platform.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] klpy6328964@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

Really wanted to like Jellyfin but it just can’t replace plex yet for me. Once it’s developed a little more I’ll definitely take another look since plex is shitting the bed.

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 67 points 2 days ago (8 children)

People into Jellyfin use smart TVs? I haven't connected mine to the internet.

[–] rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio 88 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Not every Jellyfin user is also the server administrator. If someone sets up a server and shares that server with 5 people, most of those users aren't concerned with the privacy implications of how they connect to the server; they just want to consume content as easily as they do with Netflix, Disney, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 40 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I do? I don't love Android TV but I only have so much time to fight to the good fight with shit.

I would like a less smart tv but I don't want to by a 7 year old Nvidia Shield and suffered paralysis by analysis trying to decide on on an Android TV box.

So here we are, I use jellyfin on a smart TV

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Mikelius@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 days ago

Having a smart tv doesn't mean you must use internet to utilize it. Mine is blocked from internet connectivity but connects to my media server on the local network. If anything, I prefer this so I don't need an extra computer sitting in the living room and can instead use the same single media server my phones and computers do.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 25 points 2 days ago

This feels like some really niche gatekeeping.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago

Family connect to my server with tv. If tv is in the same house everything is blocked and select things are whitelisted.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's handy to share media with my family! The Roku app works OK

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ccunix@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

We have both.

Kodi use Jellyfin for its media library and Kodi is excellent for a lot of the TV we watch. catch Up TV has replaced the decoder for watching terrestrial TV.

One thing that sucks in Kodi though is Arte (a franco-german channel that is a leans towards "intellectual"). For that, the LG WebOS app is much better than the Kodi add-on. Other than that 1 app, we could happily plug Kodi into digital signage panel if they weren't stupidly expensive.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's relatively easy to restrict a smart tv to TLS/HTTPS traffic only using your router and a dns adblocker.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Its even easier to never let it on the network.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How does it help to let the smart tv talk via encrypted channels?

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

no it helps to block everything that isnt just netflix or whatever streaming service you use. you combine a DNS adblock along with blocking all the unused ports and it severely limits the communications. you could also add a vpn to add another layer of security. idk about jellyfin but most streaming services i know use https/443 to stream to your tv. so youre only allowing the specific service you want and only on a specific port. buncha great dns blocklists here https://github.com/hagezi/dns-blocklists, and a smart tv specific one for pihole here https://github.com/Perflyst/PiHoleBlocklist/blob/master/SmartTV.txt

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hardcoded IPS circumvent DNS blocks.

Restricting ports doesn't do anything since the TV isn't running a service, it is contacting one.

Correct me if I am wrong.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Not sure if you mean hardcoded DNS IPs or hardcoded "phone home" IPs. Hardcoded DNS addresses in devices are annoying, the only way i've found to get around that is using destination nat rules (DNAT) which requires more than a consumer router typically. hardcoded phone home IPs would get blocked by your firewall. you're right that most firewalls are set up by default to implicitly allow outbound traffic. you set up a rule that explicitly denies all outbound traffic from the TV, then only allow port 443 (or whatever port your streaming service uses) on the specific IP/IPs that your service uses. Here's Netflix's published IP info for example.

edit also i'm fully aware it's fucking ridiculous that we as consumers have to go through this much rigamarole. you shouldnt have to be a literal network engineer to do something as simple as have an internet-connected tv that doesnt spy on you.

Ah that makes sense! Thank you

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I had to practically hack my Samsung TV I order to get jellyfin on it. A little annoyed it took this long but at least its there now.

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's a funny one-click tool here: https://github.com/Jellyfin2Samsung/Samsung-Jellyfin-Installer but I guess it's not necessary anymore

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Damn that looks like it would have saved me some time.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm still not connecting NY TV to any network, local or otherwise.

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apparently they will try to connect to open networks and try to tunnel through to get internet, so I set bogus manual DNS, gateway, and ip info so it can't connect to anything correctly.

[–] HotChickenFeet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they're going so far as scanning open networks & tunneling, why would they bother obeying dns gateways you specify?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Marafon@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 days ago

Game changer

[–] pleksi@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Just run a small linux pc and a wireless keyboard+mouse

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] LSNLDN@slrpnk.net 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My gosh I just searched for libux, thinking maybe there was a great new Linux user experience out there for my media library. I even got confused for a split second when it autocorrected my search to Linux before realising the typo

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] pirat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I use pibtv btw.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 11 points 2 days ago

I'd rather use an Android TV box, so I can have Dolby Vision, etc.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 9 points 2 days ago

Wait, I don't have to update it through dev mode?

[–] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
DNS Domain Name Service/System
IP Internet Protocol
NAS Network-Attached Storage
Plex Brand of media server package

4 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 4 acronyms.

[Thread #55 for this comm, first seen 2nd Feb 2026, 19:20] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[–] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Carrot@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

Literally just went through getting the app built /deployed for my parents and my partner's parents using the old method a few weeks ago. I'm super glad the app is on the app store, but it's just bad timing for me lol

[–] DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Omfg. I love you. 😭. I tried this very last week to make it work through their workaround and it never wanted to work out. Thank you so much bringing this up.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I only own one Samsung TV. Its a really smart TV. Its magnificent. It never switches input which is a good thing since I never need to. This is because it has no built in services of the so called 'smart tv's"

[–] gjoel@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Kodi running on an (old) Nvidia Shield Pro, reading from a NAS via dlnr. This works nicely and I don't get any quality degradation... Except for HDR+ which the shield doesn't support and I was stupid and bought a Samsung TV, which is bad for numerous reasons, but also this one.

And of course, we are now closing in on the decade since it was released, and still no viable replacement.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›