this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
52 points (94.8% liked)

Data is Beautiful

7726 readers
340 users here now

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

  A post must be (or contain) a qualifying data visualization.

  Directly link to the original source article of the visualization
    Original source article doesn't mean the original source image. Link to the full page of the source article as a link-type submission.
    If you made the visualization yourself, tag it as [OC]

  [OC] posts must state the data source(s) and tool(s) used in the first top-level comment on their submission.

  DO NOT claim "[OC]" for diagrams that are not yours.

  All diagrams must have at least one computer generated element.

  No reposts of popular posts within 1 month.

  Post titles must describe the data plainly without using sensationalized headlines. Clickbait posts will be removed.

  Posts involving American Politics, or contentious topics in American media, are permissible only on Thursdays (ET).

  Posts involving Personal Data are permissible only on Mondays (ET).

Please read through our FAQ if you are new to posting on DataIsBeautiful. Commenting Rules

Don't be intentionally rude, ever.

Comments should be constructive and related to the visual presented. Special attention is given to root-level comments.

Short comments and low effort replies are automatically removed.

Hate Speech and dogwhistling are not tolerated and will result in an immediate ban.

Personal attacks and rabble-rousing will be removed.

Moderators reserve discretion when issuing bans for inappropriate comments. Bans are also subject to you forfeiting all of your comments in this community.

Originally r/DataisBeautiful

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, Japan makes sense. Life as a single mother here is brutal from talking to others.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I think many children born outside marriage are still born inside a permanent relationship. In many countries it isn't normative anymore to marry when you are living together as a couple.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

This is true and I do know couples like that, however there are additional wrinkles with things like Japan's koseki system, access to daycare, etc. that can play into difficulties for those as well.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 53 minutes ago

True, I'd like to see the data further divided into "born to couples that could as well be married" and "born outside (long-term) relationship". I even know couples that marry after the birth of their children. My uncle married when his oldest kid was like 10 or so. And on the other hand, some couples marry during pregnancy and get divorced a few years later. I think the chart is first and foremost about how normative marriage is.

[–] fiskekake@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

The Scandinavian countries close to the top is no suprise to me, both my kids are born outside of marriage. But I'm confused about the latin american countries. I imagined catholicism was a pretty big deal there? Wouldn't children born outside of marriage be a big no-no?

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

There's also the issue of what "marriage" is defined as in each country. I know that there are states in the US where you qualify as "common law" married if you just live together, both agree you are married, and say in public that you are married. Even stranger is while that sounds a like a liberal thing, it's not. It's the law in at least one of the most conservative states in the US.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 10 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm just spit balling here but I believe Catholics are also very against birth control and abortion, so that could play a role as well, no?

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 8 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

The cognitive dissonance never ceases to amaze.

Birth control = SIN so better not use it while having pre-marital sex, which is also a sin but apparently one that's less important

Of course, the very idea that birth control is wrong is completely non-biblical as well, I've read that fucking thing front to back multiple times and never once read any verses that say "thou shalt not wrap it before you tap it"

[–] bomberesque@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

On that note, Philippines... no data ಠ_ಠ

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

don't forget to check christianty Extended Universe, 2000 years of people interpreting random passages in ways that suit their narrative and makes them sound only slightly delusional

"be fruitful and multiply? ah, so i need to fuck a lot. and when i fuck a lot i need to breed a lot. and if i make any attempts at doing one without the other i am evil and a sinner and will go to hell"

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Why was china and India left out of the "data?"

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

There's a bunch of other developing countries missing too, such as the entirety of Africa. Aside from their large populations, I'm not sure why the absence of China and India should be any more surprising than the presence of Colombia and Chile (for example).

It is a bit of a funny mix, though, which makes me wonder of the person who made it was trying to push a narrative.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

More likely it's the limitations of the data sources they could find

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 2 points 4 hours ago
[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know about china, but India is so conservative that it's pretty close to 0, but also probably very hard to get any reliable statistics

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world -3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't seem to be a problem for some others like Japan

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 1 points 45 minutes ago

As far as data goes, Japan is far more trustworthy than China. By a few million miles.

[–] catdog@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] f314@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of people just don’t get married, or do so very late. I bet the vast majority of those babies are born into healthy long-term relationships.

[–] catdog@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

Ahh. I confused 'outside of marriage' with 'children born our of affair'. It did not fit my image of Scandinavians at all to see them near the top of the list.

The high percentages make way more sense to me now.