this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
596 points (99.7% liked)

196

5771 readers
1712 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 109 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

"Lidar is woke and self driving cars should just fucking crash into walls when people paint Wil-E-Coyote tunnel entrances on them."

-Elon bootlickers

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 14 points 2 weeks ago

Lidar is one thing but ripping out the much cheaper front facing radar is criminal

[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hear me out, maybe both cameras and lidar?

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Neither. If I wanted my vehicle to drive itself I'd be on a tram.

[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Valid tbh lol

And anyways, if we actually wanted driverless cars on a proper scale it would be better to put wireless markers in the road to guide then anyways

But at that point just build a goddamn train

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah this is exactly the issue - private car ownership is a huge waste of resources for 99% of people. They cost tens of thousands and mostly they just sit around deteriorating. We should take like 80% of all of the money we collectively spend on cars and reinvest it into public transport.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Do you actually miss being in online arguments all the time, Natalie? If so, I think the internet may have broken your brain a little. The fact that I hardly ever end up in actual arguments here on Lemmy is part of the appeal of the platform. Even when there are disagreements, both sides tend to just walk away instead of pummel each other into the ground. But I also tend to curate myself to only communities that are well moderated, so maybe I'm just not seeing the asshats.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 42 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

She did a video where she talked about the rush of having arguments online and reading toxic trans forums. So, I believe her when she said that she misses that.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Sometimes a take is so shitty its actually entertaining

[–] FinnFooted@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I'm overly opinionated. But, If i argue with people on the internet it's a proxy for arguing with people in real life. It scratches the itch and even wears me down a bit. Then I have more self control on picking battles with people I know in real life and dont want to hate me.

Is it a healthy comping meachniam to wear down my combative side using bigots and bots on the internet? Probably not. But it works.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well I just don’t agree with you. I think everything you said is stupid.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

She's described it as more addictive than heroin. And while normally I brush statements like that, I do think it's a valuable analysis when said by a recovering heroin addict like her. It's likely similarly destructive given that it's part of the spiral that led to heroin

[–] moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was under the impression that getting into arguments was the point of the internet

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No it isn’t. Delete ur account.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago
[–] BadJojo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I know Natalie gets a lot of shit but sharing Contrapoints videos has turned a number of my friends into J.K. bashing trans allies...which is nice.

Also, I know of one guy who was helped by her incel video.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

She's not as left as I'd personally like, but outside twitter she's generally been exactly what I'd like centrists to be. I may not always agree with her ideas in videos, but they make me think and I can respect them.

Honestly I wish more of the left would look to her for an example of an effective propagandist. Her videos are entertaining and rather than being preachy she asks questions and tries to guide the audience through a path to the answer she found.

[–] pirc_lover@feddit.uk 16 points 2 weeks ago

That and I like the fact she’s generally been open with when she’s changed her opinions or when she thought she’d been wrong about something.

I dislike on the internet when people have to be either perfect or discarded. I can disagree with some of what a public figure has said or done while still thinking they are — on the whole — worthy of admiration for what they have achieved.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not sure she's a centrist as much as a progressive liberal 😅

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Listen I'm already suspending disbelief a lot to hope the left actually try to convince people that we're right instead of sticking our heads up our asses because we know we are, let me pretend that her beliefs could be in the center /s

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 21 points 2 weeks ago

She repeatedly states in her videos that she's a liberal and then people get angry at her for being a fake leftist. I don't agree with a small segment of her opinions, but it's not as if she isn't honest with her audience. I wish literally any other liberal had her level of ideological clarity.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 7 points 2 weeks ago

i love natalie ❤️❤️❤️

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 25 points 2 weeks ago

Girl is having withdrawals. Stay strong ✊😔

[–] callyral@pawb.social 24 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah but if you open door youre gonna let fire out and it will fire everything around like a recursive fire effect. it's gonna make a fire, stop make up opinions without professional knowledge, i have been a fire engineer and fire researcher and fire P.h.d. since the paleolithic period (very long ago). what is a car

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 weeks ago

This is probably considered hate speech or something on Xitter since it's against their god.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago
[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

God fuck her and her NB hate.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hates enbies? That doesn't seem on brand 

[–] pirc_lover@feddit.uk 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

AFAIK it’s a misinterpretation of her video titled ‘transtrenders’, which is provocatively titled but designed to catch people who think in that manner and re-educate them. The non-binary persona wins the argument in that video.

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No its from her shitting on people who dont pass and supporting other transmed assholes like buck angel. She sucks.

[–] pirc_lover@feddit.uk 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you want to cite what you mean by that? Because as far as I know she disavowed Buck Angel’s views in a follow up video. The only other thing I can think of is where she discussed the emotions she felt when seeing someone who didn’t pass, and explained them (that it reminds her of when she didn’t pass and thus triggers her dysphoria) without endorsing them (recognising that it’s a her problem).

Tbh I think it’s important to discuss these feelings so we can recognise them in ourselves and learn to deal with them, as feelings are often a result of societal conditioning that we need to change.

If I’m missing anything more recent then I’d be happy to reassess my opinion.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 week ago

thank you for this thoughtful and nourishing response. ❤️