this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
437 points (98.2% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

15492 readers
1564 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago

Lol, US things 🀷

(Don't hate! It really is a deeply US thing. We're a very car Country as Germany but a thing like that would be totally alien to us.)

[–] FluxUniversity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

fuck that

Why would anyone want to go somewhere where its illegal to walk outside?

No, its not illegal to walk outside. You're allowed to walk through public spaces.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 5 points 7 hours ago

So developed, much freedom

[–] GioGioMioGio@feddit.org 6 points 9 hours ago

I found the exact hotel on google maps and the distance to the stadium seems to be only 1km.

[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 18 points 15 hours ago

Seems like they should have a shuttle service

[–] hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 67 points 20 hours ago (6 children)

The REASON it's illegal and dangerous to walk from these hotels is there's a damn whole canal between here and the stadium and the bridge is a limited-access highway. https://maps.app.goo.gl/5nK4bkNg9fHkWunn7

There isn't a pedestrian bridge over the canal, that's why you gotta get a ride.

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 15 points 13 hours ago

That is literal insanity

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 25 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

That's the reason I can't simply walk to the nearby Denny's if I wanted to even tho it's like 3 blocks away; it's on the otherside of highway 99 and there are no pedestrian crossings for MILES over it.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 8 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

My FIL randomly got me an e-bike that I can't use for that exact reason. There's no way for me to get anywhere from my house without having to cross an extremely busy highway. I could drive the bike to places, but that defeats the purpose.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 points 4 hours ago

Ebikes aren't allowed on roads by me.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

How fast would the bike have to go to ride on highways? You're not going to safely go 60, but 40 might be obtainable if you can buy another battery of the same type, wire it in series, and don't give it too much current.

You're definitely shortening the life of everything, but it's better than no use at all.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I'm 100% not going to go 40+mph on the highway on a bicycle. Luckily they're building a bypass, so in a year or two I'll be able to use it.

[–] wieson@feddit.org 1 points 8 hours ago

Big up for not deliberately biting the dust

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] susi7802@sopuli.xyz 42 points 19 hours ago

Sounds like bad planning.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 34 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

So, why is there no pedestrian bridge?

[–] knightly@pawb.social 47 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Holy Shit, making it from the nearest hotel across the canal turns a 1-mile walk into a 6-mile hike =U

That has to be deliberate, there's no other excuse for it.

[–] withabeard@feddit.uk 11 points 17 hours ago

American dream

...

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

Deliberate in the sense that someone built a hotel on land that was cheap for reason?

Do you think that the city should engage a billion dollar civil engineering project to build a pedestrian bridge over a navigable canal so that it can serve whoever was dumb enough to build a hotel here?

To be clear, there are like a hundred hotels that you CAN walk to this stadium from, just not this one.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

A billion dollars for a pedestrian bridge? That thing had better be made of gold, then.

[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

found some figures about cost of bridge building and apparently if one were to construct a completely new pedestrian overpass/bridge over that canal would be on the ballpark of about 2-10 million dollars

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

That sounds a lot more reasonable. And that's a standalone bridge. If you want to be stingy, you could also just have a walkway on the side of the highway bridge. Make sure you've got a solid wall between the cars ajd pedestrians, of course.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 13 points 14 hours ago

How much extra do you think it would have cost to add an 6' walkway to the bridge when it was built, merely as a future-proofing mechanism? When your first thought is, "No one would ever want to walk from one side to the other instead of using some kind of transportation," these are the kind of results you get.

The canal was there before the hotel, so that's probably a question for whoever built a hotel in a place that doesn't make any sense.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 15 points 20 hours ago

Keeps the poors out. β€” Cave Johnson, probably

NJ DOT controls Rt 3 that goes over the bridge. You can recommend it to them.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

lmao fucking americans... "The government won't let me walk on the highway, that's the real tyranny!" What a confused bunch.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 hours ago

Also america: driving takes one mile, walking takes 6 miles to get to the same place.

[–] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I see some water there. Backpack inflatable kayak?

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Its not walking, so fine in the eyes of the law i guess?

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

yea it’s like three highways over there - you’d think they’d build a bridge

[–] socphoenix@lemmy.world 86 points 22 hours ago (15 children)

To be fair, the road design is literal highways all the way around it making it impossible to safely walk. It’s terrible design and super hazardous to pedestrians but there is a safety reason behind the rule.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 8 points 13 hours ago

They should have been required to build pedestrian bridges and paths. If we didn’t line in a shithole capitalist hellhole.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 17 points 22 hours ago

Its also Americans driving on those roads.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

The freedom of cars.

[–] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 25 points 20 hours ago

I'm glad my cities stadium is built on top of a train station. And that they close lanes of the surrounding roads for pedestrians to walk on when there's a big match

[–] TheLastRadiant@lemmy.today 31 points 22 hours ago (7 children)

I wish their was more infrastructure designed around walking, it makes me sad to see places that are so car oriented, it makes them ugly and unpleasant compared to city’s and country’s that prioritize walking and promotes a health lifestyle instead of driving and sitting in a car all day

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 22 points 22 hours ago

Those who make peaceful walking impossible make violent jaywalking enevitable

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 18 points 22 hours ago

North Jersey is a wild sprawl of highways. It’s a shame it’s not more pedestrian friendly.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί