this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
215 points (98.2% liked)

Funny

14164 readers
876 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kopasz7@sh.itjust.works 35 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Amateurs! True audiophiles know to use 24K gold plated TOSLINK cables. (optical)

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But where's the potassium?!

[–] itkovian@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Cables are made of K. 24 is the gold.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Brilliant, thanks

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

The cable is only part of the battle. You need to fill the room with pure oxygen-free air.

[–] iamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

~~Toslink is lossy tho~~

My mistake, I have been misinformed.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My mistake, I have been misinformed.

[–] Apeman42@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It was gold plated mud though.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 5 points 3 weeks ago

*impregnated

Sheesh, and ya think people know what they're talking about!

🤪

[–] itkovian@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

See, that's the issue. It should have been platinum plated.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 18 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

As someone who cares about audio fidelity a lot, there is definitely a diminishing returns. You'll see me here telling people who complain "I have to constantly turn volume up and down for dialogue in movies". That's because your sound is TV speakers, basically phone speakers, go buy a sound bar and your life will get infinitely better.

If you want to go further you can get a nice set of speakers, even surround sound, and it's fun, but it's not as impactful as the first step.

Then though if you're already at a sweet 7.1 surround sound system, it's not going to matter if you get the high end cables, or spend 5k on the most bestest receiver. At that point you're just wasting money. You may get... 1-5% better fidelity for..... 500% of the cost?

[–] mastertigurius@lemmy.world 42 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I have a high-grade sound bar, and I still have to constantly turn the volume up and down. The problem isn't the gear, it's the mastering. Christopher Nolan went all in on that when people complained they couldn't hear what characters were saying in his films, declaring that he will only master his movies for the cinema - home setups are too inferior. Nolan, my dude, I saw your movies in the cinema, and I still couldn't make out a word of what people were mumbling to each other. Why even bother writing the script in the first place? Most other filmmakers aren't much better nowadays, and I wish we can get back to the time when people who know what the fuck they're doing are responsible for sound mastering: One master for the cinema, and another one for those watching at home.

[–] rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Agreed. My home theater uses 5.1 floor speakers run through a dedicated A/V receiver and I'm constantly messing with the volume between dialogue scenes and action scenes for most movies. The gear ain't the issue for this particular problem. Though I agree with OP's statement that any sound bar is going to immediately improve sound quality over any TV's built-in speakers.

[–] damniticant@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Our soundbar has a “night mode” that basically fixes this problem

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Why even bother writing the script in the first place?

Half of Nolan's scrpts could hardly be called writing. More like Jackson-Pollock'ing random ideas onto a page

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 1 points 3 weeks ago

My SONOS soundbar has a vocal boost option. Works well enough most of the time but it really depends on the original mastering of the film’s audio.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Enthusiasts are also terrible for advice.

For 95% of people a high end soundbar is going to tick all their boxes and then some. 95% of enthusiasts asked for advice will tell you they suck and you're wasting your money.

I dont want every thing in my life to be a minor hobby. Good Enough is just that.

[–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah but a good 5.1system sounds amazing for music.

Its true. A great other example is asking any of us nerds what best computer is out there for a family member. I know I personally would rattle off all of the specs and tell them exactly what to get, when all they needed is a browser.

Now I tell them just get something that isn't on the discount rack and they'll be fine

[–] AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I agree. However, a good amount of the perceived quality also lies with the media being played. People must be aware of playing the right media with the right codecs to fully utilise their hardware.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Yall remember when Monster cables were popular?

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Does that make the electricity go through monster energy drinks?

[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think it's electrolytes. You know, what plants crave.

[–] InevitableWaffles@midwest.social 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sold those bad boys at RadioShack back in the day. The spiff on those things was absurd. We hadn't even hit the SDTV broadcast death yet and people were buying golden HDMI cables.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

What a scam

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 3 weeks ago

Didn't someone do the same test with monster cables and a wire hanger?

[–] Canopyflyer@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

That's why I consider myself an "Audio Enthusiast".

Good audio reproduction rooted in science and empirical evidence. Do I think a Carver TFM-15cb sounds different and even a bit better than a McIntosh MC7108?

Yes I do.... Why?

Because I have both amplifiers sitting in the same rack and have A/B'd them extensively. Honestly, the Carver's build quality is utter crap. Barely above what you buy in a box store, but damn does it sound nice. I use the McIntosh exclusively because it's just a better piece of equipment, even though it doesn't have those 2nd order harmonics that the Carver is tuned for.