846
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 168 points 1 year ago

I support eliminating billionaires.

[-] Artemis@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m not having kids because billionaires have bribed, lobbied, misinformed this country, and by extension the world, to the brink ruin

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Throw_away_migrator@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago

You're telling me the billionaire whose family fortune came from apartheid emerald mines is a total cunt?

I'm shocked! Shocked! ... Well, not that shocked.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 79 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, “I don’t want to say gay and intersex people shouldn’t be allowed to vote, but I do want it to happen.”

Anyways I’m sterile and drive the most fuel efficient vehicle practical, don’t eat meat, and have made other sacrifices for future generations to have a habitable planet. Musky here has a private jet and at least one of his kids hates him

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago

How about we stop caring what that clown has to say?

I find it especially egregious the people who (rightfully) bash him, but continue to support his products such as Twitter and Tesla. Stop supporting him. Especially on Twitter. Advertisers have fled the platform. Some users have as well. If even 1/2 the people who claim to hate the guy just stopped using Twitter, the entire platform would collapse. Instead you people prop up that site by going to it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wackypants@kbin.social 74 points 1 year ago

To think that not so long ago, this authoritarian, grifting man-child was hailed as the real-life Tony Stark. If the mask slips any further, even his remaining fanboys are going to find it difficult to defend him.

[-] Veltoss@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

I don't think he has near as many fanboys as the musk circlejerkers on reddit always made it out to seem. I barely ever see anyone genuinely fanboy him anymore, at most many are neutral to him while still thinking he's an idiot.

I think reddit (and social media in general) just has a habit of giving megaphones to "the other side", no matter how small it actually is, so they can have someone to appear to argue against so it doesn't look like they're yelling at a wall.

[-] Itty53@kbin.social 49 points 1 year ago

Not enough people point out he has bot farms at this disposal.

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2022-04-12/musk-is-off-the-twitter-board-of-directors-the-tesla-twitter-bot-army-marches-on

Old news, predates Twitter. His popularity is wildly over estimated. It's inflated. It's fake. Always was meme.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] obinice@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

Why report on that guy's opinions as if they matter? He's rich, not a voting rights expert.

He's a fascist, too, which people conveniently ignore because he's rich and some of it might rub off on them.

[-] MrCrowBard@lemmy.fmhy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

For the same reason the opinion of someone like Rupert Murdoch matters. Its not about their viewpoint directly as an individual, its the fact they control massive platforms that can and do sway public opinions.

In murdochs case he's had an influential impact on British politics over the last 40 years and has used his media empire to act as a king maker.

Musk isn't as savvy or as intelligent as Murdoch but that doesn't mean is influential position should be ignored.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] MomSpaghetti@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

Elon Musk probably also supports eliminating voting rights for people without a blue check

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CynicalMillennial@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago

They took our ability to have children through monetary strain, caused by corporate greed, now they think we should lose voting rights lol...

[-] dub@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So that means no taxes I guess?

[-] Ragnell@kbin.social 55 points 1 year ago

Elon Musk shouldn't be allowed to vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jtk 53 points 1 year ago

Just stop giving this idiot attention, it's what he gets off on. You're all getting him off. If that's what you're into, fine but, if it's not, you're being taken advantage of.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tyson712@kbin.social 53 points 1 year ago

Stop. Feeding. The. Troll!

[-] MrFlamey@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

At this point I have finally realised that Elon Musk is an attention-seeking cunt and we should probably start to just ignore him, at least for a while.

However, I've got some ideas! Instead of people without children, how about we restrict the vote to the children themselves? How does that sound, Elon? Nobody over 20 should get a vote because they only have... pthh, I dunno, a few decades, 90 years at most left on this planet, so fuck them. Am I right? Maybe we could give everyone a voting point for every year they have left assuming an average lifespan of 75 years - perhaps women could have more points as they generally live longer. That would be fair, no? We should also completely take money out of politics and stop billionaires and large corporations from undermining democracy too! Don't you think that's a great idea?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

When will Elon eventually or slowly fade out of popular media and when he's alienated everyone around him he can go away and live as a recluse. He can be the next Howard Hughes, living in a dark casino hotel room wearing Kleenex boxes on his feet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ilex@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

Crazy, out of touch billionaire has a crazy, unrealistic idea. Fucking stop the presses.

[-] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

I support eating the rich; one bite at a time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] QubaXR@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Like all republicans, Musk is in favor of eliminating voting (and other) rights for various groups, one by one.

[-] YellowtoOrange@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Considering that he doesn't give a shit about his own children, this is typical Musk-Irony (tm)

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I disagree with his fundamental premise that people with children can see the interests of society better.

I don't have children, but I have heard from every possible source that once you have children they become your world.

How is a person expected to reason clearly about the interest of millions of people when they are running an ancient biological program focused on the interests of a tiny family unit?

edit: I once saw the argument that having family doens't make you a better person. Having family makes you a ruthless user and taker on behalf of your family. Most of the stories you hear of people giving in to corruption, happen because those people can't afford to lose their jobs, because they have mouths to feed. Once you have kids, you must choose whether you value your kids over your civic responsibility, or vice-versa.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Holyginz@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

I hate that so much credence is being given to the words of that mouth breather. Dude was born with an emerald spoon in his mouth and has a god complex because he bought a car company.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Welcome to the rise of aggressively pro-natalism billionaires, because it's 2023 and we're not imploding fast enough.

Remember, you won't have a seat on the transport to Mars. And if you ever get there, it will be to work the mines.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Djangofett@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 year ago

I really hope this guy loses everything one day.

[-] GildedGriffon@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 1 year ago

A guy with three passports for three different countries should take his wildly out-of-touch idiocy and fuck off.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago

Has he even met most of his children? Does he even remember X Æ A-12's birthday?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

He has a trans daughter who hates him. She disowned him and legally changed her last name when she became an adult.

I can't imagine how terrible a father he has to be in order to turn down inheriting part of the richest man in the world's fortune.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bappity@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

FrEe SpEeCh

[-] G59@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Judging by how he treats his wives, he probably even wants to repeal women's right to vote.

[-] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Immediately read this headline and thought "Next, only married people should be having kids so realistically only the husband needs to vote since his wife should align with him". Followed by some good ol SA-style apartheid for the minorities.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rhabuko@feddit.de 34 points 1 year ago

Not surprising anymore. The guy (like his father) has a insane breeding fetish. And never forget that his father groomed his own adopted daughter (that he know since she was a child) and has two kids with her 🤮.

[-] Elpinchepana@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Yeah, only the desperate, finantially dependent on shitty jobs to feed their youngling should vote. Only them and the wealthy people that provide said shitty jobs. That will surely save what little democracy is left. You know what? People that make as much money as Musk should not be allowed to vote or to donate in order to influence campaings. These dudes have no real nationality, they are not tied anywhere and don’t have the best interest of any nation at heart. Billionaires are practically a walking, talking, foreign power operating within your country’s borders with almost total impunity. A self-deluded eugenecist foreign power at that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mojo@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago

Why do republicans hate freedom so much?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] smoll_pp_operator@vlemmy.net 30 points 1 year ago

This last couple years has done a great job of exposing the Musk family weird breeder kink.

He doesn't even do the work himself for THAT, He uses artificial insemination.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SloppyPuppy@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

why republicans always find a way to deny voting for some random group?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] zgasma 29 points 1 year ago

I support 100% tax over $1 billion. If you can't manage on a billion dollars, the rest would be better spent on others, anyway.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] frumpyfries@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Maybe we should take away his rights too since he doesn't actually take care of his kids.

[-] allyougottadois@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Are people still listening to that idiot? Like, why though?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] skellener@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

Republicans sure are obsessed with eliminating people’s voting rights. So let’s remove all Republicans from office instead by voting them out in the next election. ✊

[-] menemen@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] UnfortunateDoorHinge@aussie.zone 24 points 1 year ago

I like how he's burning bridge after bridge with everyone. No one would want to associate with him, and everything he touches turns to shit. Sure he can enjoy his money, but to an extent he's kinda screwed his venture start-up goodwill for life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zefiax@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

People forget a huge side of this as well. It's not just being financial able to have kids but physically able. More and more people now days are seeking fertility treatment and having fertility issues. According to elon, those people would not have the right to vote.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SoPunny@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Talk about unalienable rights to life and liberty

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
846 points (93.5% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2132 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS