Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43260174
Maybe I'm a bit off, but out of all those 'bases', aren't a nontrivial number of them literally just an office on someone else's base? A sole soldier sitting in a base in the middle of somewhere counts as a 'military base' if they are supposed to be there.
Yeah many times it's just a couple of officers that are there at the request of the country to help train their soldiers.
It’s not about capitalism it’s about hierarchy.
If the Soviets hadn’t shit the bed at every opportunity they’d have 900 military bases around the world propping up their hegemony.
I mean, after Lenin it was basically state capitalism, so same difference
Also all 3rd world workers would get promoted to CEO for working brutal 12-14 workdays.
"If begging the question worked, we wouldn't need it smuggled in through a shitty meme."
"Over 900 military bases around the world" is doing a lot of heavy lifting considering a) the 900 figure is pulled out of their ass and more importantly b) it's more like 130 outside the US, mostly concentrated in a few countries – unless the meme is suggesting US military bases on its own soil are there primarily as a bulwark against socialism.
More importantly, though, as someone else pointed out: it's about hegemony generically. If US foreign military bases exist not to further US hegemony but in the interest of worshipping capitalism, why are there bases in Europe standing in defense of social democratic countries against – what has now been for decades – one of the world's most hypercapitalist shitholes? Genuinely what work are these bases doing to uphold specifically capitalism? Did I wake up in 1983? Is the 82nd Airborne on its way to Grenada?
Keep europe dependent on the yankee empire and they act as forward basis so the yanks don't have to airlift everything from turtle island every time they decide to bomb west asia. What sort of dumbass question is this? Ofcourse they're there to uphold capitalism, what else would they be there for????
You might have had an argument if this were the 1980s. But communism failed. The "communist" party of China is dominated by billionaires now. Even the communists are capitalists now. Your socialist youtube influencers are all monetized and are heavily promoted by big tech's algorithms. Many of them have merch stores and are millionaires. Leftism is just an aesthetic packaged and sold in a capitalist system.
Capitalist authoritarians in China maintain a communist aesthetic to have some weird semblance of legitimacy, and capitalist authoritarians in Russia have some nostalgia for the communist aesthetic. North Korea is backwards monarchy now, struggling to keep people from starving.
The military doesn't maintain capitalism because at this point the "communists" are all capitalists now. Maybe for a time it helped protect against the authoritarian capitalists but now the US authoritarian too. We're back to the era of Great Powers, and capitalism vs. socialism isn't a factor much like it wasn't a factor in the Great Powers world order of the past.
Sorry but Santa Claus isn't real and communism died a long time ago. You're just being sold the carcass by capitalists.
So I guess we have three options:
Wonder which it is.
(Actual argument done, I can insult you without it being ad hom: fuck off, tankie. I disagree with ancoms sometimes on pragmatics, but their ethics are sound; not yours.)
Department of Defense, “FY2025 Base Structure Report,” 2024
According to DOD its now 1143 bases
The spreadsheet (source here) literally says the number of sites as of 30 September 2024. Do you understand that "site" and "military base" are different things? Here are their definitions if you want to play illiterate. A foreign site in this context can be any foreign property run by the DoD, including e.g. an office building. In your version of events, the Congressional Research Service says it's 128 as of mid-2024, WBW using an extremely lax definition of what constitutes the US operating a military base arrived at 844, and I'm supposed to believe the CRS and the DoD differ by nearly 10x and that the WBW totally missed this public report showing that they came up with less than 3/4 of the actual number...
... Is what I would say if you weren't completely misreading this spreadsheet anyway. 1143 represents the "grand total" of "land-only sites" in the US, US Territories, and overseas combined.
You're. Just. Lying. Stop being disingenuous or fuck off.
Carrying water was expected. Little pissant seems to have hurt feelings
Would you describe a person being annoyed by mosquitoes as having "hurt feelings"? I have no respect for you and therefore no concern for the minimal amount of time you deign to spend crafting a cogent argument for me.
What I do care about is a tankie propagandist coming into an ancom community and shitting it up with disinformation. Ancoms are friends; you are not.
Please don't argue with mosquitos, that's fucking crazy man
You sound more MAGA than ancom. Based on your downvotes it doesn't look like you are the friendly one around here
Anything based is a military base 🎖️🪖
US military confirmed operaring zero military bases?? 😱😱 (Except when helping Eastern Europe against Russia; they're pretty based then.)
If red light cameras worked we wouldn't need them.
Traffic and car-centrism exist because of capitalism. Fuck the man, take the bus.
If possible take the trains, if there are no trains take the bus, if there are no busses bike, if no bike than walk, if you cannot walk because the infrastructure is that hostile move to somewhere with trains (like NY or Chicago but ideally NY)
Seriously though, the amount of money I saved by not owning a car gets me a pretty nice place in a city with transit, it's not great transit but I can't afford a larger city like Vancouver. Unfortunately where I live is also notoriously hostile towards pedestrians and cyclists.
I live in NYC completely car free, I take the subway everywhere and I just can't imagine my life without a good transportation system. I would genuinely recommend anyone who lives in a hostile area with no transit move.
My peers are dying due to this mindset. Just because a measure is effective does not mean it isn't nessecary. Don't need seat belts, people are rarely dying...
I'm not sure I get it because red light cameras do work.
They're designed to take pictures of the license plates of vehicles which illegally run a red light so that a traffic ticket can be issued to the driver. This ensures that the driver will have the infraction on the record and that the jurisdiction makes some (mostly) passive income.
Which part is not working?
The act of having them to enforce fines is designed to stop people illegally passing, not to find raise. However, people still illegal go through.
I need her in my bloc
That is capitalism working.
