And they still wonder why people in civilized countries don't buy american cars...
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
71 points (98.6% liked)
News
36086 readers
3528 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
There are 3 categories of game:
- Positive-Sum Game: win-win alliance
- Zero-Sum Game: competitive narcissism
- Negative-Sum Game: competitive nihilism
In Trump's mixture of zero-sum & negative-sum games ( mass-shooters are playing primarily negative-sum games: the greater the holocaust, the "bigger their win", but inter-mass-shooter-narcissism's significant, too ), Trump is still primarily zero-sum .. but that is changing..
When he finally gets fed-up with being frustrated by the "woke", & invokes the Insurrection Act, or martial-law, or whatever guillotine he takes to civilrights, then it'll be competitive-nihilism 1st, competitive-narcissism 2nd.
He's already made it illegal for states to regulate AI.
He's already tromped on renewables as hard as he can, while pushing coal & oil.
He's already got in-place a rampaging-of-the-population intended to trigger ANY reaction he can get that'll "justify" removing all civilrights ( the ICEing of the Democrat states within the US )
Once he's crossed that tipping-point, then .. it'll be an all-Americas-mass-shooting, demolishing all for sake of making absolutely certain that NOTHING is "great" after he's gone.
Why would gas-guzzlers be a "dead-end future" when the category-of-game they're playing DOESN'T HAVE ANY "future" in it?
When it's an endgame, with NO future, by intent?
See what's actually going on!
A kenjutsu guy pointed-out, years ago, that IF one is trained & conditioned to assume that one's opponent wants to live, so any cut directed their-way will be blocked..
but this time one's opponent doesn't care whether they die, only that YOU die..
THEN all one's instincts are wired for the wrong category-of-game: a game that one isn't in!
Then one dies.
Netanyahu's "Israel" is presuming that their "deterrent" is somehow self-inherent, when it's actually dependent on their neighbors valuing their-own lives more than they value annihilating Netanyahu's "Israel".
Once Netanyahu's "Israel"'s narcissism/machiavellianism/psychopathy/sadism ( DarkTetrad ) has eradicated enough deterrent from their-region, then why wouldn't Netanyahu's "Israel" get annihilated by suicide-troops?
Deterrent means deterring!
IF one's behavior removes deterring, then one has no deterrent, anymore!
Netanyahu, whether unconsciously or consciously, is playing the mass-shooter's game: competitive-nihilism.
So is Putin.
So is Trump, but with Trump, it's still narcissism-1st, nihilism-2nd.
That's changing.
When it becomes nihilism-1st, then all the big "owners" will be literally "saner" to join the regime-dictator in competitive-nihilism, if they value their remaining-life's quality: to do otherwise would make their remaining-life hell, obviously.
I'm not saying it is "right" or Right to push an evil's rule, or its ways, I'm saying it is humanly-sane: it is understandable, it is explainable, going against one's context has COSTS, etc.
For the oligarchs to push what the ruling-regime wants being-pushed, is, within-their-context, sane.
This is identifying that it isn't that they are the origin of betraying-our-world, rather, they're just navigating their-world in a contextually-sane way.
The problem isn't them, the problem is the whole-system of valuing DarkTriad, rewarding it, giving it all authority possible, segregating people by class-status, pushing the underpaying of parents ( manufacturing whole-population attachment-disorder, which helps create the narcissism that the far-right feeds-on ), & obscene overpaying of the wealthy..
that this is all an inevitable end-game of the diseased "values" our system embodies.
What Detroit's owners are doing is natural but they are symptom, not cause.
The cause is our corrupt "society", with its glorification of DarkTriad & its eradication of accountability from authority, its systemic segregation-of-wealth-from-the-bottom, its systemic rejection-of-responsibiliity, its systemic pushing-of-narcissism-growing-distractions, its protection of disinformation, its removal of actual Journalism, replacing it with "journalism", etc.
What they're doing is symptom, not cause, and it is honestly rational, within the "reality" of the Trump regime which will enforce that it is final ( there will be no regime going the other-way, afterwards, after Trump removes civilrights: it's too late ).
It is simply "when IN Rome, DO as Romans do".
Maybe ideology won't allow that humankind has responsibility, & will insist that it is THEM that are the problem, and not more-fundamental-problems..
but truth's got to be spoken by somebody, somewhere.
It's the same as the majority of East Germans being snitches in order to ingratiate themselves with the machiavellianness-institution ruling them: that, too, was showing/demonstrating human-nature, honestly & actually.
What it was showing wasn't nice, or good, but it was accurate.
Within that context, integrity was .. not viable, & humankind adapted, & became embodying of absence-of-integrity.
I think people aren't understanding that the genociding that the zionists are enforcing in Palestine is the same-nature as the genociding that ICE++ are going to be enforcing within the US, after the dictatorship tippingpoint.
But 100x as strongly.
It's the same nature, fundamentally.
& any business which wants to "get along" within what's coming .. has to adapt to becoming what the context wants.
( I'm saying this while knowing that humankind doesn't show any indication of being able to survive this-century: humankind looks, to me, like a drug-addict who's in the process of "blowing their brains out" with drugs, because the alternative, going dry, is intolerable.
& that at this point I ought have no hope, as it's only baseless delusion.
Humankind's devotion to ignorance, nonresponsibility, fighting-appearances-not-fundamentals, solving-the-wrong-problem, prohibiting-accountability, disallowing-responsibility, etc, is indellible.
& the consequence of that is .. species DarwinAward: extinguishment, later this century.
At this point I consider divine-intervention to be humankind's ONLY chance, and .. I'm not seeing any evidence that that's happening.
Humankind won't solve the right problems, with the right drive, in the right order, with all actually-required force.
& .. imagine some drunk fighting-you-off, as you try getting them off the train-tracks, before the oncoming-train splats them all over the sky..
at some point, you have to just accept that there's nothing you can do, step back, & witness their non-responsible self-obliteration, right?
Humankind's doing that, now..
& it's depressing-as-hell.
A whole world being thrown-away, for sake of habits, conventions, entrenched-beliefs, ideologies, prejudices, etc.
& the required-objectivity, the required-correct-reasoning, the required-worldview-accurizing ( all 3 are dimensions that differentiate Science/Empiricism from ideologies ) .. just aren't having roots-enough, in humankind. )
_ /\ _
I don't ever want to go back to a gas car
At a fucking minimum, new gas vehicles should be hybrids. Compare the MPG of vehicles that have a regular gas and hybrid version. It's like a 30% reduction in fuel consumption. It doesn't require a lot of batteries to do this either.
Batteries are already so recycled at an industrial scale that the best "ore" for new lead acid batteries, and lithium ion batteries is literally recycling the batteries. We already have close to a 99% capture rate on lead acid batteries because of industrial recycling and economic incentives. We can do the same with any other type of battery that exists, since the raw materials don't change at the atomic level, unlike fossile fuels that do, so they can only be burned once.
It's cynically amusingly ironically pretty much exactly the old cliche about the advent of the automobile putting buggy whip manufacturers out of business.
We're exactly at that point, and official US policy, under Trump, is to discourage automobiles and subsidize buggy whips. And even a moderately bright child can see how that's going to work out.
But children have the advantage of not being blinkered by a lifetime of compromises, betrayals, excuses and lies in pursuit of wealth and power.
Looking forward to the next “big three automaker” bailout after this strategy fails.
"We need a bailout or we're going to have to lay off lots of people."
"Alright, here's a lot of taxpayer money."
"Thanks for the cash. Oh, by the way, we're laying off a lot of people."
"Efficiency! It proves we were right to give you all that taxpayer money!"
All trucks and SUV should be forced to be sold with a proper trailer hitch setup, to be considered a truck or SUV. This would encourage people to use utility trailers.
But they're releasing smaller trucks too, which is great. I don't need to compensate for anything, I just want to be able to easily haul lumber occasionally. It's nice being able to do that while still getting 35+mpg highway.
Aye. I have a 4×4 for a specific job. It pretty much only gets used for that. It is exactly the dimensions and capacity it needs to be. If it were larger or more powerful, it would lose its purpose.
It baffles me that in the US, people use them as dailies, don't put them to work, and almost treat them as a status symbol, despite what they really represent.
Some of it comes down to the way so many of us are underpaid.
I'd get a hell of a lot of use out of a pickup truck if I had one. Not enough to want to daily drive it, but enough that it would be worth having.
But for most of my daily driving, I could just about get away with an electric golf cart (the way laws are in some states I probably could use something like a golf cart, but my own states implementation of NEVs and such are a little stricter)
In an ideal world I'd have some little electric sedan for most of my daily commuting and errands, and then a truck (though probably a small one) for when I need one.
But I don't have the budget for 2 vehicles, nor the parking space for them.
Personally my compromise is a mid-sized SUV that fits most of my needs well enough. Others may decide that the best compromise for them is to daily drive the truck. I don't think most of those people have actually thought too deeply about whether that's actually a good choice, but I'm sure that for some people it does actually make sense.
Mine is a daily driver, but it's basically a smaller SUV that they put a bed on instead of a trunk. It has AWD and 3500lb towing capacity which is all I really need.
I love small trucks. My parents have a '93 ranger, it gets pretty good mileage with that little 4 cylinder engine, and has a 7ft bed, and it's hauled all of the lumber and furniture we've ever needed it to.
It's only rwd, so it's kind of shit in any kind of weather, and it's 0-60 time is probably best stated as "eventually" but that's realistically all I need from a truck.
I like the maverick, but I'm not a fan of the short bed. I'm crossing my fingers that maybe they manage to finagle a midgate into it somewhere down the line.
Otherwise I'd really love for them to bring back something like the 90s style rangers (or Tacoma, S10, Dakota, etc.) as a hybrid or electric, or hell even a decent modern 4 cylinder turbo could probably give a nice mpg and performance boost. The modern versions of those small trucks are significantly bigger than I need them to be, and in at least some cases you can't even get them in a long bed configuration anymore.
Why not buy a sedan and use a utility trailer?
Parking is an issue in a lot of places. I have 2 parking spaces I can use, and they're needed for my car and my wife's. I don't have anywhere convenient that I could park a trailer.
And I could rent a trailer, but that can be a pain, the handful of times I've done it the places nearest me didn't have the trailer needed in stock on the days I needed it, and if you need it frequently enough it can get pricey
And, frankly, towing a trailer is a skill that some people just don't have. They might do just fine in truck, but throw a trailer into the mix and things can get weird quick.
You can and I've looked into them
Fact of the matter is still that I live in a townhome with no parking besides my 2 assigned parking spaces, an HOA that definitely wouldn't like me leaving it on the front lawn, and to put in in the back of my home I'd have to get it over a curb and drag it through about 5 neighbors' back yards to get it under my deck (and the HOA might still have something to say about that)
So to have a trailer of my own, I'd have to find somewhere to store it, and since I don't have any friends with extra space in their driveways who will let me leave it there, that would mean more ongoing expenses.
Because I occasionally haul stuff that a sedan can't.
I'm also tall, so entering/exiting a sedan is difficult if I can even fit.
Are there any viable EV alternatives for 3/4 and 1-ton trucks yet? Seems like the last time I checked, that was the last logical use case for ICEs remaining the default. Admittedly, it's been a while since I've looked into the EV ecosystem because I Iove my ancient AWD station wagon too much to ever replace it until it dies a natural death. And I'm not in the market for a truck, either.
Not true alternatives and I don't think this is that shortsighted for big truck manufacturers as the issue here is battery capacity and recharge time which won't be addressed by building more EV trucks using current tech. All the components needed already exist outside of the batteries and once that tech develops further it should be relatively trivial to build these drivetrains. These companies are still building EV cars, which gives them the R&D needed for trucks too since they all use the same components just with different ratings.
You might want to look into the work trim level of the Silverado EV, that thing has a massive battery/range.
The most eco-friendly car is the one you have now. Using it to it's rusty end before getting a new one (new or second hand) is the best eco choice you can make.
For 3/4 ton and 1 ton trucks I haven't seen anything yet. I'm keeping my eye on the new EREV trucks. Ram and Scout have models coming out supposedly this year or next. They're basically EVs that come with a generator to recharge and extend your range. The Ram is advertised to get 150 miles pure electric and up to 750 before running out of fuel. Should solve the range anxiety problem. I think if they sell well, then we might see some larger trucks. I don't have any hope that they won't be super expensive though.