this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
216 points (91.5% liked)

politics

28561 readers
2205 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They've amassed missiles armed with warheads. Let that sink in and realize what they really are, because it's not a force for immigration enforcement, it's an army simping for Trump. They will be weaponized at a much greater scale in the future certainly.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

They went from asscrack hanging out their dad jeans to looking ready to drop into the middle of a war zone.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

Raw Story already stretches the truth for clicks. You're here just making completely unsubstantiated claims. They are doing more than enough heinous shit without people mudding the waters with lies.

In response to the article itself, which references a 360% increase in weapons spending, ICE more than doubled the number of agents it employs. I wish they wouldn't, but they seem to think that all of these untrained traitors need weapons. It makes sense that they would have a massive increase in weapons purcheses to outfit the new traitors and the future traitors they're hoping to hire.

This is a non-story for the most part and you don't need to add lies to it.

[–] CascadiaRo@lemmy.zip 23 points 3 hours ago

They’ve amassed missiles armed with warheads.

The article you linked makes no mention of this. What is the basis for this claim?

[–] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

Not one mention. Why you lying op? There's plenty of bad shit in here without lying

[–] ChrisG@lemmy.world 82 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

More accurately, its preparation for martial law in November. Any US citizen who thinks there will be free and fair elections is not paying attention. The regime are not leaving power willingly.

Time is running out for nation wide general strikes ..

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You don't need missiles for martial law though.

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 4 points 3 hours ago

Who needs martial law when you can bomb a voting centre and say it was overrun by Antifa

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 53 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

I thought the whole "missiles and warheads" thing was a debunked claim from a misunderstanding of less-lethal launchers and their ammunition. Rubber balls and teargas sorts of stuff.

What they're buying seems to be the same shit that any podunk small-town PD has been buying for the last 15 years with their budget surplus. Which is a problem in and of itself, but it's not an escalation beyond what is unfortunately the norm.

If they're picking up heavy machine guns or Hellfire missiles, let us know.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 22 points 5 hours ago

Yeah there’s no reference to that in the article.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

That's the trouble with raw stories. They're often inaccurate. Yet if they say what will get people riled up, they'll get engagement and praise here.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago

Actually it's looks like the summary below the source is what's inaccurate. Neither the title nor the story talk about warheads.

[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world -4 points 4 hours ago

Raw news is the hyperbolic left leaning version of News Max... designed to get you upset but accomplishes nothing.

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world -1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Maybe I'm not reading your tone correctly, I get you're maybe trying to correct some misinformation about "missiles topped with warheads", but this seems to be really, REALLY downplaying the threat here, especially with the last line of "if they're buying this other shit, let us know" like what they currently have access to isn't bad enough for the threat to US civilians?

I'm just wondering why you took this take. Again, unless i misread your tone here. It just seems extremely dismissive of basically a shadow army loyal to Trump.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

So more than one thing can be evil at a time. Posting with a title that is clearly not even implied by the linked article is the kind of evil misinformation that got us in this mess. That is as close to a "tone" in what he wrote. It's nowhere near extremly dismissive of anything. Doesn't even mention anything about a threat.

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

🤷‍♂️ I guess you're right, but the take away I got from their last sentence was ICE buying more weapons isn't something they are concerned about or want to hear about, unless its machine guns and hellfire missiles. That's the dismissive part to me. They're saying it's not news worthy unless it's an escalation from the weapons regular police departments already have.

I was the one saying this [ice buying more weapons] is a threat. To U.S. civilians.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

what in the fuck would an immigration agency need with missiles of any kind?

what in the actual fuck

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Because they're not an immigration agency, they are a certain twatwaffle's personal bully party. An inept, untrained, pathetic bunch of tiny dicks. The brown shirts, if you will.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 40 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

No shit, ya don't give em the largest budget of any enforcement agency and expect them not to spend it, right?

“Trump is building up a well-funded, poorly trained paramilitary force that could easily take on a life of its own,” Brooks explained. “Once you have a massive moneymaking machine ginned up, it’s hard to reverse course and turn off the spigot.”

Doge them, immediately. Take the guns first, go through due process second. Let that sink in, Thank You for your attention to this MATTER.

[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 11 points 5 hours ago

Re-electing Trump is the worst financial decision this country has ever made.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 4 points 5 hours ago

Trump knows he's screwed if he loses the presidency. He knows he must hold onto it by any means.