this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
178 points (98.4% liked)

politics

28910 readers
2138 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Taken together, the draft rules are a “very telling sign of this administration and how they view blue-collar workers…they have decided that they no longer have to care about workers at all.”

If only it was new or just this administration. Thirty years ago in high school we read a book about this same exact garbage from 1906, and it wasn't exactly news then either.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That was actually about the treatment of immigrants, he just overdid it on the linework descriptions.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

You are quite correct, I should have said the book highlighted those issues, not that it was about them. As Sinclair said, "I aimed at the public's heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach."

While socialism never took off to the extent Sinclair hoped, we did get the Pure Food and Drug Act and Meat Inspection Act, though those are feeling more like suggestions rather than standards with things like these policy changes and how cleanliness and food safety were treated through the COVID epidemic.

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 28 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Even more dangerous for the animals? The whole place is purpose built to kill them. I think it's already pretty much peak danger for the animals. I think rather, what these workplaces are becoming is more cruel.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

They plan on scaring the bejesus outta the animals before slaughter because they think fear makes the meat better, when in reality it makes it worse.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 weeks ago

This is the pedantry I came here for. 5/5

[–] MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly what I thought reading this XD

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry chickens, how can we make your inevitable death more comfortable and inviting? I don't want to taste the fear.

As for the workers... meh. I don't eat human meat so it doesn't much matter to me.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Sorry chickens, how can we make your inevitable death more comfortable and inviting? I don’t want to taste the fear.

You laugh, but you really don't want to taste the fear. It really sours the meat.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Uhmmm ... its a slaughterhouse. It literally cannot get more dangerous for the animals.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

While technically true, there's always room for deterioration.

[–] Wammityblam@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Cruelty is the point

[–] digitalFatteh@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

And Children. Someone small enough has to get into the tight areas to clean for these slaughterhouses.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago

Shut them all down.