this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
34 points (81.5% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

2887 readers
341 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am trying to understand why thinking with completely different moral standards when considering the foreign policy of countries is so normal for US Americans and Europeans? On second thought, these different standards also apply to domestic policy, don't they?

It's not just normal you are generally considered crazy if you apply the same standards to Israel or US Americans as to everyone else. Have you ever replaced Israel or US America with North Korea, Russia or China just as a test in news articles? Or, conversely, replaced North Korea, Russia or China with Israel or the US?

The double standards and extreme bias is so obvious that I find it very irritating that most people don't seem to realize it.

Imagine North Korea, Russia or China blowing up girls' elementary school? How would the media report it?

Original q: https://www.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/1rhx681/why_is_thinking_with_double_standards_so_normal/

My answer is, who control the media is always right. Human right, justify works just if it serves interests of western world.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think conversations are helped by generalizations. "Western" pulls lots of individuals and nations, with near zero power, into the blame.

Likely blame is the extremely wealthy that own the media and politicians.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

This 1000%. If the decision makers were public figures then people would be held accountable but the "Heritage Foundation" is making some decisions while AIPAC is making others and no one knows who to hold accountable. These foundations mask the psychotic minds pushing for these inhumane policies.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Yes, the double standards are sickening.

I wish I knew the answer, but I've read enough history books to know that whoever has the money generally gets to drive the narrative, and that our species will always work to destroy itself. It's in our nature.

[–] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

supporters of the current fascist government regularly engage in doublethink--genuinely believing in 2 contradictory beliefs simultaneously. people often mistakenly call it "cognitive dissonance." it's not. there is no "dissonance." come to think of it, there's no "cognition" either. just parroting fox news. they literally scream "think of the children" while supporting pedophiles in office, and refuse to take any action whatsoever to stop school shootings.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

What about our current government makes it fascist that our previous governments did not have? I ask because under the administration GWB and Cheney they came up with a list of 7 countries to topple and Iran was the last one. The listed included Libya, which Obama and HRC executed, with HRC literally gloating at the report of the 70+ year old leader of Libya being killed by being sodomized by a bayonet when she said "We came! We saw! He died!".

People have been analyzing the double standards of the US for literal decades. The US was an apartheid state not that long ago. The Third Reich studied US law and culture as the model for building an effective apartheid state so they could do it in German and hopefully extend it to Russia when they eventually won the war.

Truman collaborated with the Pope to save 10K Nazis from justice, relocating them all over the Western hemisphere, protecting them, funding them, etc.

So why are you only saying the current government?

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Not OP and not saying all your points aren't true. But they don't determine fascism. What is new in the current government in regards to fascism according to my understanding is the personal Führer cult in combination with the open hate of democracy and 'might makes right' philosophy.

Obama ordered crimes against humanity and was the head of an imperial engine, but his government still showed allegiance to democracy and to institutions instead of persons.

You can have a fully democratic empire conquering the world and it still wouldn't be fascist. And I'm not saying the shit the USA were doing before were excusable, right or in any way defendable. But now they fully took off any masks of democracy the Democrats were smart enough to still keep on.

Edit: forgot to add: so the biggest thing that changed wasn't really the behavior of the USA to the rest of the world, but instead how they treat themselves. And it seems a lot of USA citizens (and Western in general) before were fine with it. They wanted to believe the Hollywood version instead of seeing the real thing.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

Every single president incrementally adds to the fascism of America. Reagan's neoliberal abandonment of Americans who needed help and the massive consolidation of the financialization of the economy. Bush 1 was the first formal fusion of the CIA and the presidency. Clinton, as governor, had black house slaves, and as president, sexually dominated at least one subordinate that we know of. He also was at the helm as NATO when it expanded to become an offensive, and not purely defensive, transnational nuclear military. Bush 2 created free speech zones, oversaw massive domestic spying and immunity for companies who broke the law, the opening up of private for-profit military collaboration beyond anything previously seen, and of course all the torture and war crimes. Obama expanded the president's power to just kill whoever wherever whenever through drone strikes, killing civilians at weddings and funerals (and funerals for those who died at the weddings), and even killing US citizens abroad.

not saying all your points aren’t true. But they don’t determine fascism

When you save 10k Nazis from justice, that's not a tell for you? When you and the Soviets rebuild Germany, and your side has openly former Nazi politicians taking political office while the Soviet side purged all fascists, that's not a tell for you? When you form NATO and staff it with former Nazi officers, that's not a tell? And when you direct NATO to organize, fund, arm, and manage neo-nazi groups and former Nazi collaborators into standing militias and terrorist cells, that's not a tell?

is the personal Führer cult in combination with the open hate of democracy and ‘might makes right’ philosophy.

Have you been to the US? Are you aware of the insane cult of personality we have around nearly every single US president? The media spectacle? The us vs them? The angel/devil photography? Do you know what we teach our kids in school about Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln? Like, Jefferson is literally worse than Trump. Trump was a consumer in Epstein's ring. Jefferson literally ran slave plantations, bred slaves for sale, raped his slaves and sold the children that came from those rapes, and tried but failed to use his political power to ban the transatlantic slave trade so that his slaves would fetch a higher price and make him richer.

Obama ordered crimes against humanity and was the head of an imperial engine, but his government still showed allegiance to democracy and to institutions instead of persons.

So you're saying aesthetically he wasn't openly fascist but in actuality, he was? Fascism is determined by aesthetics for you?

You can have a fully democratic empire conquering the world and it still wouldn’t be fascist

This is such a contradictory sentence. No, you cannot both have a fully democratic empire and conquer the world. That would be a partially democratic empire. Specifically it would only be democratic for the "in-group". For the US, that in-group is white, male, hetero, patriarchal, Euro-Centric, Anglo-Centric, property owning, capitalistic, and Christian. That's LITERALLY fascism when it's coupled with killing millions of people to maintain your empire. It's also the farthest thing from "fully democratic" when democracy works for the ultraminority white supremacists and everything is might-makes-right full on subjugation of the rest of the world, including the indigenous people you displaced and continue to oppress daily.

And don't forget that the US imprisons more of its own people than anyone else in the world (El Salvador and Cuba just passed us for 1 year, but are historically lower) and that's JUST in prison. The parole system, where we surveil their entire lives, garnish their wages, tell them where to be when and then throw them back in prison for any missed requires, is TWICE AS LARGE as our prison population. We are the world leader in dominating our own people.

But that's not fascist enough with the aesthetics?

But now they fully took off any masks of democracy the Democrats were smart enough to still keep on.

They still haven't taken the masks off. Just watch them in the UN. Watch them on television. Read their papers. YOU have figured out that they're lying. But they're still actively lying. You are just finally part of the group that sees it. Other people, particular the victims of US imperialism, have seen it for literally decades. You were part of the group of people, as was I, that thought "Death to America" and calling America "The Great Satan" was only done by people who don't understand us and who are actually evil in their hearts. You are realizing that they're right, but you think it's only really appropriate for THIS administration. It's not. Keep reading history. Keep analyzing the situation. We were founded by people who trafficked humans, raped them, and tortured them. We are still being run by people who do those same things. We were founded by people who were traveling around the world killing anyone that wasn't a white Christian man and convincing other white Christian men on the basis of their white Christianity to help them do it. We are still operating a country that follows that exact same program.

EuroFascism as we know it from Italy and Germany emerged from the European context. It was quite literally European settler colonialism applied on the continent. The first gas chambers were invented by the French to kill masses of Haitian freedom fighters. The US was a fascist apartheid regime for most of its history. Every single town or city called "Fort Something" was literally a military base for killing every single Indian that didn't manage to run away.

It's ALWAYS been this bad. The way we use language it's almost as if fascism was new when Hitler and Mussolini did their thing. But the reality is that they were just applying the logic of their context, which the same logic America, Canada, Australia, and the rest of the settler colonies were founded on. Every. Single. One.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

The entire Amerikkkan government has always been fascist

[–] hesh@quokk.au 5 points 8 hours ago

Because the west runs the world and controls the media

[–] RainbowHedgehog@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It really depends on your perspective. If you hate the regime of Iran, you focus on the slaughter of tens of thousands of unarmed protesters, forcing people to pay for the bullets that the IRGC put in their heads before being able to pick up the dead family, and bringing in radicals from other countries to help you kill protesters.

If you have an anti-West bias, you are gonna focus on sanctions, the failed interventions, and yes, the bombing of the girls school.

Neither is right because neither have the whole picture. I’m just tired of people claiming anti-West or anti-American perspectives are somehow immune to bias.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

how does killing school girls hurt the bad Irarian regime?

[–] RainbowHedgehog@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

How does forcing people to pay for the bullets put in their dead family members brains hurt the west?

I’m not for the bombing of the school. That’s beside the point. The point is that both sides manipulate the narrative. Both have double standards.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 8 hours ago

Burgerlander here. You're not wrong.