this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
114 points (91.9% liked)

World News

54353 readers
2656 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

War highlights strained alliances, unfettered militaries and a Washington with renewed appetite for regime change

A joint US-Israeli operation that appeared to use nuclear negotiations as cover. Gulf leaders courting Donald Trump as he decided to launch a major Middle Eastern intervention. Europe boxed out and a G7 defence minister caught so off-guard that he was grounded in Dubai as the bombs fell. And from Moscow, a strongly worded condemnation of the missile strikes against a fellow member of the anti-US “axis of upheaval” – and little else.

The war unleashed by the US and Israel on Saturday has exposed the new rules of geopolitics in Trump’s second presidency, with strained alliances, unfettered militaries and a Washington that has regained its appetite for regime change.

Despite an administration that claimed it would pull back from the Middle East and Europe in order to focus instead on the growing threat from China, the White House has toppled one leader in Latin America and has launched another war – that could easily become a regional conflict – with no clear plan for a transfer of power in Iran.

MBFC
Archive

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra@lemmy.org 16 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

How the hell did they get caught off guard? He telegraphed this so loud that we could hear it coming a week away.

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

We were even getting articles that stated we'd be at war by the end of the week

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I'm getting to the point where I basically predicted it would happen on Saturday too, because Trump has to make every single day all about himself. He just hates that weekend break where people do things like...not think as much about politics and spend time with their loved ones. It's also why he posted some unhinged amount of posts over the Christmas / New Year's holidays.

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 22 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Look, I’m just saying, maybe… extraditing him to Iran after his term might be a funny solution to him that doesn’t get tied up in the courts. Just black bag him and do it right away just like his goons do right now

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The funniest solution would be Maduro becomes US president and Venezuela gets Trump.

[–] TheHotze@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago

Thats cruel and mean. Venezuela doesn't deserve that.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 53 points 17 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 53 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I know, right? The only thing surprising about this, is the fact that people are acting surprised about this.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's surprising for sure.

That the Ayatollah was above ground, at his marked compound.

Iran had been saying he was no longer in Tehran, with outside sources claiming he'd fled.

US/Israel very likely considered he'd be hiding in one of very large number of deep underground bunkers. Smoking him out would take weeks to months.

But there he was, above ground, in Tehran, in a very watched compound.

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

Of course there's also the question of: where and how deep are you going to put her/him underground? How are you going to keep her/him informed to make decisions?

At a certain point it's more logical to keep moving around quickly and have a contingeny plan than banking on avoiding a strike.

Wouldn't surprise me if they had the same thing going on for Putin... Xi might be a bit more hypothetical

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 5 points 13 hours ago

I think the timing caught people off guard.

Everyone thought there would be more sabre rattling.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm surprised they actually got the dude. Not that they bombed Iran though.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Wasn't he just in his office?

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Dunno. I definitely wouldn't be chilling in my office if I was the leader of a nation at war with the USA, a nation well known for it's ability to deliver a warhead to within a metre of it's intended target with a high 90% probability of success.

[–] Lucius_Sweet@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I think the nation you are referring to is more well known for blowing up entire weddings to kill one guest. None of the USA's "precision" munitions are anywhere near as accurate as you have described according to the people who actually use them. The supposed accuracy is just propaganda to make citizens more accepting of the government bombing other countries as they think the government "will only kill the bad guys."

The reality is what happened to those 100+ school girls in Tehran. "Collateral damage" is the US militaries catchphrase.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I've heard speculation that was caused by a failed Iranian missile landing on the school, not by the US.

I wouldn't take it at face value, but it's a possibility.

[–] Lucius_Sweet@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

There has been a disinformation campaign going around claiming that the Iranian government admitted responsibility that has been debunked and also false photographic evidence that has also been debunked.

It seems like someone or some organisation is putting a fair bit of effort into a disinformation campaign to muddy the waters on this one. This is shameful stuff to be amplifying at this stage without any evidence, you should be ashamed.

https://www.thejournal.ie/what-we-know-about-the-blast-in-the-girls-school-in-minab-iran-us-israel-strikes-children-death-toll-6972038-Mar2026/

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 hours ago

Well it could have been a meteorite

Don't take it at face value

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They took out Soleimani with a precision missile from a drone. Of course it's costly but there's no reason to doubt they have this capability

[–] Lucius_Sweet@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The loitering predator drone fired several missiles engulfing two cars in the explosion, killing 10 people. That does not sound to me like precision and more kill them all and let God sort it out.

Or do they have this capability to put a missile within a metre of the target and hit that girls school in Tehran on purpose?

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You're not reading what I'm writing. They do have high precision weapons, but it's too costly to use them for everything.

It's very unlikely that they wanted to bomb girl schools and only hit one, don't you think?

[–] Lucius_Sweet@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You responded to me disputing how accurate the USA's precision missiles are by using the murder of Soleimani as an example of the USA's precision weapons. I disputed this by saying Soleimani's murder was hardly a precision strike and more a loitering reaper drone with knowledge of its target's arrival unleashing several missiles in a hellish fireball that engulfed two cars and killed 10 people.

Surely attempting to blow up a target next to a small girls school would be the perfect time to use one of these costly precision weapons, if they exist? Now 150 children are dead, thanks for the "freedom", I'm sure those girls parents are delighted.

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

The point you're missing is: there's not one accuracy for US missiles

If you can limit the damage to just two cars from a motorcade from a high flying drone, I think it's pretty disingenuous to not call that a precision strike.

But I think your last post shows that you just have a lot more baggage that you feel you need to inject here

[–] Lucius_Sweet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

My last post shows I have baggage, regarding the USA and Israel slaughtering another 150 innocent children? I am as guilty of this as Netenyahu is for his crimes against humanity and the USA for backing Israel all the way. As a parent I am angry that none of those little girls gets to grow up and have a life as a result if uncle Sam's heavy handed tactics.

We both obviously have different definitions of what a "precision strike" is. You think that several hellfire missiles obliterating 2 vehicles and 10 people is a precision strike where I would call a precision strike one where the target is taken out alone with no innocent bystanders also murdered.

When is America going to wake up and realise that Hollywood has been lying to them for years, America are the bad guys. The Trump guy in charge is the perfect embodiment of American values, he is the president America deserves. The only silver lining is that this clearly marks the beginning of the end of 150 years or so of American hegemony.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 7 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I don't think they considered he would actually follow through. He's backed down like a little bitch when it actually came down to it previously.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 17 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The cowardly thing for him to do was bomb Iran, that was clear as day.

Anyone who thought he wouldn't is a fool.

He sometimes did, he sometimes didn't. He did bomb them at least once publicly.

That should have been enough for people to assume he would do it again when he feels cornered on an issue like the Epstein files.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Like when he abducted a South American president?

[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 15 hours ago

More than just abducted, he made a deal with their military to be the de facto puppet and give up maduro.

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Just let them deal with this shit. Not our problem.

[–] datendefekt@feddit.org 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This may become at least Europe's problem when they're confronted with thousands of refugees.

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Well we are gonna get that anyway when the middle east becomes uninhabitable due to global warming.