this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
110 points (100.0% liked)

news

24687 readers
753 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Snip:

Only one in four Americans approves of the US military campaign against Iran, a Reuters/Ipsos poll published on Monday has indicated.

The weekend poll of roughly 1,300 US adults found only about 27% approved of the strikes, 43% disapproved, and 29% were unsure. Moreover, 56% of Americans – including one in four Republicans – said US President Donald Trump, who has ordered strikes in Venezuela, Syria, and Nigeria in recent months, is “too willing to use military force” under the pretext of advancing US interests.

While 55% of Republicans approved of the strikes, 42% said they would be less likely to back the Iran campaign if US troops are killed or injured. The poll closed before the Pentagon confirmed late on Sunday three US servicemen had been killed and several wounded.

Fuel price fears also weighed: 45% said they would be less likely to support the campaign if gas or oil prices rise. Global oil prices jumped by up to 13% on Monday on concerns over tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway between Iran and Oman that carries about 20% of global oil and gas supplies.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 44 points 3 weeks ago

42% said they would be less likely to back the Iran campaign if US troops are killed or injured. 45% said they would be less likely to support the campaign if gas or oil prices rise.

grillman Yeah, I support terror bombing wars of aggression. Unless there are consequences for my team...

grill-broke and GOD HELP YOU if I have to spend a few more dollars to fill my F350!

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 36 points 3 weeks ago

43% disapproved, and 29% were unsure.

This fucking country and it’s stupid fucking people, I swear to fucking god I can not take this anymore

[–] princeofsin@hexbear.net 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Look Americans didn't do shit when the Iraq invasion happened outside of bullshit protesting. They are not going to hold anyone or anything accountable regardless of how much they bark about how their Slave owner masters gave them the right for guns. Its a nation of pussies who only punch down. Fuck the United States Of Pedophiles

[–] Pikache@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Americans have had enough evidence of their government's cruelty and war crimes. Let's admit it - none of it has been enough to make them revolt.

[–] MarxMadness@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

To not be suicidal, a revolt takes a lot more than lot of unhappy people. Criticism of the U.S. populace is more than fair on many fronts, but it's hard to overstate the difficulty of the task.

[–] etsy@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

they want to act like life is simple black and white and the reason things are bad is bc evil people make them bad. it's just neoliberal ideals turned inwards, appealing to the metaphysical and regarding those on the opposition side as irredeemable monsters rather than uneducated victims, it's unhelpful and reductive.

[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago

I totally agree with the sentiment and the anger, but don't use "pussies" as a slur. Pussies are good and strong. I'd rather call USians weak cowards who only punch down. At least those who either lack class consciousness or have accepted a class compromise and entered the labor aristocracy.

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 26 points 3 weeks ago

if the usa was a democracy it would be very upset to hear this

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The poll closed before the Pentagon confirmed late on Sunday three US servicemen had been killed and several wounded.

rip-bozo rip-bozo-grave rip-bozo-grave rip-bozo-grave

[–] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago

Surely this means that the Epstein Coalition will call off the airstrikes then, right? anakin-padme-2

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago

when has that ever mattered?

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Anecdotally, this matches with what I've seen. Basically everyone I know but chuds and Iranian diaspora ate worried about getting in another war.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 18 points 3 weeks ago

I dread it coming up around my sous chef who got all indignant about my lack of support for the revolters and was all "Go ask [iranian coworker!] about it!"

Idk how she gets to such positions when she reads more than i do but i guess maybe liking contrapoints cancels any and all literacy based stat gains

[–] Pikache@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Rubbish. Americans as a whole, TIME AND TIME AGAIN, have allowed their government to commit war crimes around the world. Obviously they're not bothered enough to revolt. Americans are letting the world down. You deserve the government you have, as someone said - but unfortunately for the rest of the world, we're paying for your psychotic rulers.

[–] etsy@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I can't tell if you really believe this lmao. being reductive has never been helpful

[–] Pikache@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

Furthermore, too many Americans are deflecting onto Israel as though the poor US government is being led by their tail into a war they don't want. And let me guess, the majority are going to wait until the next election to vote a good one in because "This time, THIS time they will finally be on our side!" I don't feel like I'm being reductive. I'm calling Americans out on what their problem is. This delusion of living in a democracy needs to go.

[–] fox@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Give it two weeks and they'll be 99% in favor (reps) and 51% in favor (Dems)

[–] jack@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, support for wars in America famously increase the longer it goes on

[–] Spongebobsquarejuche@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

Well… What are you going to do about it whitey?