Figures, sorry.
this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
324 points (98.2% liked)
Technology
82329 readers
3288 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I really don't remember the last time Firefox crashed on me and I've been using it for many years
Yeah same here. Sometimes I think some people either have no clue how to use a computer or they do it on purpose and then complain.
Technically every that happens on a computer is a bit flip 😏
Unprovoked bitfllips then
Naughty bitflips 😏
Nonconsensual bitflips
Indignant bystander: "fucking whore!"
Firefox kept crashing on me a few days ago. Decided to run MemTest86 and sure enough. Bad RAM.
Ouch, my condolences to your wallet
load more comments
(2 replies)
I flip my bits looking at porn using FireFox and that shit almost never crashes 🤷♂️
load more comments
(1 replies)
This is how dev humblebrag sounds like.
Our app is so stable only random hardware events like bitflips can crash it.
load more comments
(3 replies)
What makes Firefox more susceptible to bitflips than any other software? Wouldn't that mean that 10% of all software crashes are caused by bitflips and it just depends what software you are running when that happens.
Programs that use more memory could be slightly more susceptible to this sort of thing because if a bit gets randomly flipped somewhere in a computer's memory, the bit flip more likely to happen in an application that has a larger ram footprint as opposed to an application with a small ram footprint.
I'm still surprised the percentage is this high.
Is it high? How does it compare to any other software? First time hearing of someone actually measuring this.
This checks out with Linus Torvalds saying most OS crashes across linux AND windows are caused by hardware issues, and also why he uses ECC RAM.
Honestly yeah it's 100% checks out.
I have device that has ECC ram and I can keep it online and applications running for well over 18 months with no stability issues.
However, both my work computers and my personal computer start to become unstable after about 15 to 20 days. And degrade over the course of 1 to 2 years (with a considerable increase in the number of corrupt system files)
Firefox and chrome start to become unstable after usually a week if they have really high memory usage.
Can confirm, my linux server with ECC RAM has 1040 days of uptime now without a single issue.
I don't think they're arguing that Firefox is more susceptible to bit flips. They're trying to say that their software is "solid" enough that a significant number of the reported crashes are due to faulty hardware, which is essentially out of their control.
If other software used the same methodology, you could probably use the numbers to statistically compare how "solid" the code base is between the two programs. For example, if the other software found that 20% of their crashes were caused by bit flips, you could reasonably assume that the other software is built better because a smaller portion of their crashes is within their control.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›