this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
171 points (98.3% liked)

News

36375 readers
2396 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. job market turned weaker last month, dashing hopes for an economic rebound.

A report from the Labor Department Friday shows employers cut 92,000 jobs in February, when economists had expected the U.S. would continue adding jobs, albeit at a sluggish pace. The unemployment rate inched up to 4.4%.

Job gains for December and January were also revised downward, with December now showing a net loss 17,000 jobs.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago

Woah. We're losing jobs under a Republican administration? NO WAY!!!!!!

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 49 points 23 hours ago

Unexpectedly??

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 44 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Someone had hopes of an economic rebound under this administration?

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 24 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Coming out of the pandemic the US had one of the best looking economies. If he had done nothing he could have taken all the credit. Instead he decided to shoot himself and the country in the foot.

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 24 points 22 hours ago

Idk if he shot himself in the foot. His family gained billions in net worth, and he's still not in prison.

They definitely hamstrung the rest of us though.

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Coming out of the pandemic the US had one of the best looking economies.

You sure about that? A devastating health care crisis with life expectancy of an African country, poverty and violent crime rates 5-10 times higher than many industrialized nations, an employment rate more than 10 percentage points below the top countries, rampant homelessness, a staggering prison population, massive public debt, crumbling democratic institutions...

Above average, sure. The Trump admin made things significantly worse, sure. But if there ever was a time when the US had "one of the best-looking economies," it was many decades ago.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Under Biden wages were growing faster than inflation, inflation was coming down, unemployment wasnt growing, stockmarket/business were doing well. Meaning things were doing okay and had the potential to do even better.

Also, a lot of the points you made aren't directly tied to the economy and are systemic to the country. No matter how good the economy is doing, privatized Healthcare is going to cause issues.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

In that case, what is "the economy" and why should I care?

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

That's a fair call out. My comment about systemic issues was to address the fact that it's somewhat unfair to compare apples and oranges. So when I said the economy was doing well under Biden, I meant in regards to the current systems in place in the US.

That being said, the economy is generally measured in how productive the country is. If the economy is doing good, then generally we have lots of people producing lots of things. That doesn't mean we're producing the right things though, as that comes down more to policy and public sentiment/behavior.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

"the economy" is the larger system as a whole. you're looking at smaller systems that contribute to it (i disagree with jacksilver that they are not directly tied to the economy, but if you get two economists in a room suddenly you have 8 opinions instead of 2)

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Systemic issues that have gone largely unaddressed (by Democratic admins) or have been exacerbated (by Republican admins). And the economy has suffered as a consequence.

No matter how good the economy is doing, privatized Healthcare is going to cause issues.

In fact, several universal health care systems rely less on public health care spending than the US system does.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 29 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Unexpectedly? Who were these "economists"?

You can probably find 2 articles a month since last summer alone that say the tariffs are going to make more people unemployed.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

from Liberty U probably. or Brigham Young. they've got economics departments that cozy up to republican administrations and tell them whatever they want to hear.

[–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 19 hours ago

If the juiced numbers are this bad, the real numbers must be absolute dogshit.

[–] Gumbyyy@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

"unexpectedly"

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago

This the winning part?

[–] GameOverFlow@lemmy.zip 3 points 19 hours ago

They don't want Jobs, they want AI.

[–] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Where'd ya lose'm, not exactly a keyring

[–] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 3 points 23 hours ago