this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
564 points (99.8% liked)

politics

28809 readers
2569 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jamesrandysghost@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

This is the entire reason they hitched their wagon to fascism. Protection for those in power and persecution for those who are not.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

Ah yes, Schrödinger’s war.
It’s both a war, and a non-war “military operation,” depending upon what’s most convenient for the Republicans.

Uh oh, corruption?? In a state?!?! We better send ICE down there pronto.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 14 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I was told it wasn't a war because that would require congressional approval

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Special military operation... Like 5 years of it

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Technically, legally I think that's true. Functionally, Vietnam lasted 20 years, cost billions of dollars, the lives of 58k Americans, and millions of Vietnamese lives but was never a declared war.

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 4 points 14 hours ago

Testing. Hannibal Directive.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 112 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Simple, issue an arrest warrant, right?

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, that’s the ruling class. They are not subject to laws.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Funny thing is, this whole democracy thing was supposed to have been a compromise so we didn’t have royals get their heads chopped off so frequently.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Clearly the carrot has failed and it's time to bring back the stick

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Spare the rod spoil the child

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

I like how you think.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s a federal crime to prevent a congressperson from conducting their duties, madly.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Simple, have them arrested and delivered to the Ohio trial. That way you are not preventing them from conducting their duties but actually helping perform two (obeying the arrest and testifying at the court), so there's no foul.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As that prevents him from voting in the house expect federal agents to forcibly remove him from custody.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have him mail his vote. Or hve him attend the voting in cuffs.

Come on, am I expected to do your whole homework? What side are you even on?

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Votes must be in person. I didn’t make the system. Turns out when you’re a slave-owning traitor you’re sensitive about making yourself above the arm of the law.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago (1 children)

WTF does an ohio senator have to do with the iran war?

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 15 hours ago

certainly nothing to do with voting to allow it

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago

Man, I love reporters like this. Not even a comment either way on the quality of this specific reporting, but the first-person, openly adversarial but not hostile, “the people want to know” style of reporting is what we need more of. And it is fast disappearing with the general Bezos-Ization of news in America.

[–] hitstun@feddit.online 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We didn't even vote Jon Husted in as Senator. JD Vance won that seat and left it to be Trump's VP. Our governor appointed his lieutenant governor Husted to Vance's seat. Then, he replaced the lieutenant governor with a football coach.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Drainin' that swamp (directly into open seats of government).

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Clown ass state. So glad to be gone. Out west my votes actually matter

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

So.....

It's a war again?

[–] decapitae@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago

There fascists are almost done pretending they aren't nazis... That's a bad thing.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Judge (if they have a spine): He voted down a resolution to limit the Presidents war powers. Clearly he's abdicating his role in the war. See you Monday!

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

Politician priorities are plain.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

Wrong, Congress is not needed for dealing with wars anymore.

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Judges need to stop with the warnings and just start locking these disingenuous bastards up straight away.

[–] justalittleguy@lemdro.id 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Y'all already voted to let Trump do whatever he wants, so what are you needed in DC for? Also you have 99 coworkers who can get the job done

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Well, now that he's abdicated his congressional responsibilities of holding war powers (along with purse strings), isn't he all done with war involvement? Should have plenty of time