this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
491 points (98.8% liked)

science

25792 readers
703 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 1 points 6 hours ago

Moon curry when?

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] melfie@lemy.lol 9 points 1 day ago

Is that Moonsanto’s patented corn that is genetically modified to grow in a vacuum? Maybe in the future, all the HFCS, hydrogenated soybean oil, etc. will be produced on the Moon, leaving Earth’s land for more suitable purposes like strip mining coal and data centers that manufacture AI slop.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Now all they need are some daal and rice

[–] limer@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Hydroponics can grow plants too

[–] Gexilla@lemmy.zip 100 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Denalduh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I heard it's out of this world!

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You need humus to grow hummus ;)

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

The better question is: can humorous humans make humus to produce hummus in the lunar pumice?

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

imagine it was way better then earth chickpeas
and it made the hummus better

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Haha, Good one.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 day ago

i cant wait to eat Lunar Falafel.

[–] melfie@lemy.lol 22 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Lunar regolith is pretty nasty stuff that is sharp and sticks to everything. It’s pretty damaging to lungs, equipment, etc. I’d imagine using it as a raw material for cultivation would bring about some challenges.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I’ve also learned about it being sharp. What I haven’t heard answered is this. It’s sharp because there’s no weather to wear it down. If there were, how easily would it wear down? Does it crumble the second anything touches it? Being sharp and staying sharp are two different things. How much of a threat is this stuff, actually?

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, but the alternative is to stop destroying our own soils and respect our ecosystem, and humanity has proven it will take on any challenge except cleaning up after ourselves

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Look at a Saturn V. Look at a bag of chickpeas. If you think somehow launching a Saturn V (at a minimum) to get back a bag of chickpeas is somehow better for our ecosystem, I think I see why humanity is doomed.

Space Nuttery is not the solution to anything.

[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 hours ago

I was thinking this was future planning for the other direction. While actually having a permanent colony of civilians on the moon is unrealistic, having a layover/fueling station on the moon that will have a small population of researchers, engineers, etc. is actually pretty feasible, and any mass sent up there will still be expensive. Shipping seeds is significantly cheaper than shipping food, and dirt is heavy, so you want to ship as little of it as possible. If it's possible to grow stuff in lunar soil, that drastically decreases the amount of mass that needs to be sent.

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s exactly what I mean - we come up with all sorts of madness to grow food and obtain resources from further away. And society completely glosses over how impractical and wasteful it all is.

Meanwhile, what we could use is treat our planet properly and succeed with the amazing gifts it already provides. We are the only species that seems hell bent on sh*tting where we eat, and we come up with these inefficient strategies all to avoid cleaning up after ourselves

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Oh, you're right, I didn't register your meaning, I get so upset whenever I see Space Nuttery I lose all civility.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Yah people skipping over this really don't get how hard it is to grow plants in what's basically finely ground glass. We take for granted that we have stuff on Earth called "soil" because hot damn, that shit doesn't exist anywhere else that we know of. Soil is a product of millions of years of complex interactions between plants, bacteria and water and fungus and other life forms. Everywhere else in the solar system you go, all you get is the equivalent of pulverized asphalt.

I have this idea that if aliens ever did invade because they want some resource we have, it certainly wouldn't be water or minerals, but the one thing we have here that you can't find anywhere else is fertile soil. I just don't know how exciting of a story you can weave around dirt-seeking aliens.

I don't think we're ever going to see a permanent human settlement off our world, at least not in our lifetime, but it's good to know that our granddroids have a chance. Assuming they actually need to grow plants out there.

[–] tryplot@piefed.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

we'd be the compost planet. we'd live on their food scraps, and they'd harvest the results

[–] melfie@lemy.lol 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That’s true—water is abundant in the solar system, but soil is magical stuff. The perchlorates in Martian regolith are especially nasty. Not going to be growing ‘taters like Matt Damon does in The Martian anytime soon.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Perchlorates are water-soluble, and there is lots of ice on Mars. But people won't live there sustainably, so there is no point to it.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

because hot damn, that shit doesn't exist anywhere else that we know of. Soil is a product of millions of years of complex interactions between plants, bacteria and water and fungus and other life forms.

Actually, you only need ground bedrock, some organic matter and some bugs & and worms and a few years (like, 2 to 6). And Mykorrhiza and water of course, for most plants.

But the Moon is special in that it doesn't have erosion, the "dust" is in the form of microscopic shards, sticky and abrasive.

While dry desert planets like Mars – with erosion — have mostly the Australian kind of fine dust, which also sticks to everything, but is not abrasive.

Btw, there's also Orsol farming; growing them on a sponge, with nothing but some fertilizer juice. Though they are usually more bland, since they lack some micronutrients (due to the lack of Mykorrhiza, among others).

[–] xav@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

Funny I didn't know that word "Orsol". Guess it's another word coming directly from the French : "Hors-sol" (literally "out-of-the-ground" or "off-ground") which is used for growing plants in an artificial substrate.

It's coarse and rough and irritating and gets everywhere.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Mixing vermicompost into the regolith seems a bit like cheating.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Vermicompost is something you can readily make on the moon, meaning with this it proves you can take a resource available on the moon and grow in it.

Big deal IMO.

Well. “Proves” since it’s simulated regolith, not real regolith, and it was done on earth.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I started out wondering if this simulation would work again in lunar gravity, and now we also need vermiculture to work in lunar gravity.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

We’re already working on worms in space!

https://www.esa.int/kids/en/news/Worms_in_space

Granted these aren’t the works we’d make vermicompost from … but still steps in that direction

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Cool. Sadly it doesn’t seem like it was even a goal for those worms to survive.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Yeah, we NEED to find a way to cheat, cheating is what will let us actually do any of this.

You need far less composting agents this way, you can add a little to a lot of moon soil to make it fertile enough for growth, and then once plants get started it will work towards making even more compost/soil.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What would you propose, then?

We use organic amendments all the time when reclaiming historically mined lands that did not salvage soils.

Soils take millennia to form, and you're not going to get fertile soils without either kickstarting the process or waiting.

Another commentator points out that using arbuscular mychorrizhal fungi is also cheating. Again, how?

To have a functional soil and not regolith you need the following:

  • An organic matter source - regolith lacks this
  • A moisture retaining media - regolith usually has this but its ability varies widely
  • Enough rooting depth for your desired plants
  • A method to transform organic matter to nutrients - regolith generally lacks this

Organic matter is your pool of nutrients and microbes and fungi are what mineralize this pool into plant available forms, so saying they are cheating doesnt hold water (like a shitty regolith).

But I can grow plants in glass beads! Sure you can, but you're supplying chemical fertilizer to do it and constantly replacing that - so in this case you're the organic matter pool and the transformation vector.

@melfie@lemy.lol @cadekat@pawb.social

[–] cadekat@pawb.social 18 points 2 days ago

The article seems to imply the compost was added to both the plants with/without the fungi?

Definitely cheating in the "can we grow plants?" department, but still useful information.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 14 points 2 days ago (9 children)

How would the moons gravity affect the growth of crops?

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

That’s what you don’t get from this simulation.

My uneducated guess is that 1/6th gravity would still be a great deal more like earth than 0 gravity.

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago

Low and zero gravity can affect how roots spread/dig and later can cause issues with how water and nutrients circulate through the stalk since they evolved to circulate with Earth level gravity. Space station experiments have proven it’s not impossible, the plants can adapt, they’re just a bit different. Trees would probably struggle, most crops would be fine. What’s really difficult is pollination. You’d probably have to hand pollinate, set up a wind system in your greenhouse, or get self-pollinaters. Bees would struggle to adapt because low gravity would mess with their flight, their dance communication, and probably their honeycomb structure and larval development.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›