this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
84 points (100.0% liked)

Space

2274 readers
203 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Don't try to find it in the picture, folks. At that resolution the area of the crater would be less than two thousandths (2/1000) of a pixel if it were in the centre of the photograph.

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So OP and I clearly have different definitions of the word "massive. "

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Strictly speaking no crater can be massive, because a hole by definition is a lack of mass

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Except for black holes

[–] albbi@piefed.ca 22 points 4 days ago

One of the first craters the orbiter spotted after it began its mission in 2009 was 70 meters wide, said Robinson, of Houston-based spaceflight company Intuitive Machines. β€œI used to joke with folks … that now the bar has been set, you have to find a 100-meter crater,” he said. β€œNow, lo and behold, we have 225 meters.”

This quote sounds like something that should be posted to !dullsters@dullsters.net.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

We had a meteorite over Cleveland last week, and another over Houston that hit a house last week, and now a new crater on the moon. If we're lucky, another dinosaur-level asteroid will put us out of our misery.

I, for one, look forward to the new jobs this asteroid will bring!

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Sleepy Joe couldn't even keep the moon intact πŸ™„

[–] Luthis@anarchist.nexus 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

why is the moon upside down?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Who are you to say which way is right side up?

[–] Luthis@anarchist.nexus 5 points 3 days ago

I'm a reference frame

[–] KingOfSleep@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The moon is "upside down" for half the planet.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That broke my brain for a second.

[–] Luthis@anarchist.nexus 1 points 3 days ago

it took me a few minutes to figure out why the moon looked weird

[–] Draconic_NEO@mander.xyz 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Because you probably live in the southern hemisphere and it is oriented in the thumbnail as it is in the northern hemisphere.