this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
700 points (99.2% liked)

politics

29166 readers
3744 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aeao@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Dumb dumb: the ballroom is under budget!

Citizens: the 200 million ballroom that is now 400 million? That ballroom is under budget? Under the doubled budget expected?

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 12 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Hey look at that. That one dude that posted the stuff here 6 months ago or so about the designs and plans and mentioned how all of the donors were related to people that are doing underground data centers and stuff like that for Israel are the same group that are working on this with none of the other people that should be involved with ballrooms like Tiffany and stuff like that being associated.

[–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

It's also important to note that someone else wanted that to happen and trump personally really wants a ballroom that's bigger and gaudier than obamas.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

If there is two things trump is a expert on its stupid and lawsuit. Its just one thing with him though.

[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

Omfg, he's so fking dumb. Idiocracy!

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Probably would've scurried into it when he loses the 2028 run

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Good. We can seal the doors, cut the power, and leave him and his cronies to rot in there forever.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Quickly Mr. President, help me bring the guests to your fancy ballroom a cask of amontillado we keep in the secret bunker.

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

He would totally bite. There’s no way he’s familiar with that story

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 2 points 8 hours ago

He definitely hasn't ever read a book for pleasure. Maybe just never read a book.

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

I saw this movie, it was called Civil War and was one of the most genuinely anxiety fueling films Ive seen in recent years.

What kind of American are you?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

It's scheduled to be completed months before the election, but the part he cares about is underground.

The thing is, even if there's absolutely zero way to get inside, it doesn't mean shit if no one outside the bunker listens to him.

It would be the perfect ending to this if he really goes down into a bunker with his closest circle who have the supplies to live decades...

And after waiting a while we just seal the doors.

It would 100% be worse than prison for everyone sealed in there. Just leave them to die together in a hole.

But the ironic part is there was already a bunker there, and it's likely now compromised.

So if the new one doesn't get finished, there won't be any bunker under his direct control.

He wanted to build his own, so that no one else knew how to open it. Like, if he went to one of the still secret bunkers like under Biltmore, people that are outside know how to get him out.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I mean that's really not what it was for. It was more along the lines of an underground data center but the command center for the president that was upgraded and updated similar to the ones that have been built in Israel over the last few years that gives them a place to hide and everything. It's not really a bunker related to Trump himself going underground he just wanted to be the one to build it and the one that it got he got remembered for.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It’s not really a bunker related to Trump himself going underground he just wanted to be the one to build it and the one that it got he got remembered for.

...

I mean, he'd use the bunker anyways, just like he uses every other part of office for his personal benefit.

But if you think any president wouldn't go in that bunker if need be, or it's not prepared for that contingency....

Well, that's just fucking wild to me.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

My point is he's not going to go lock himself down there and refuse to come out when his presidency is over. That's just kind of ridiculous. This fucker is going to be dead before then or shortly after that.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

That’s just kind of ridiculous

Less so then living up to this point in American history and thinking that's ridiculous...

But I'm not gonna keep trying to explain shit when you reflexively downvote.

You want an argument, I wanted to help you understand something.

Now we're both disappointed.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 25 points 17 hours ago

I absolutely would have known nothing about the military complex but for Trump opening his big mouth about it repeatedly.

Knowledgeable people are aware that any construction at the White House also involves fortifications and bunkers.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 16 points 17 hours ago

Pfff. He would have posted pics of it himself eventually.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

America chose fascism. And you're surprised when fascists act like fascists?

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

America is fascism, just ask the indigenous people deprived of their land and life, the piles of dead buffalo slaughtered as part of accomplishing the American genocide, and the dead slaves. This isn't America acting like Nazis, Nazis acted like Americans - Hitler was directly inspired by how we treated migrants at the southern border.

But yeah, while we're on the topic anyway...

The Vorbunker (upper bunker or forward bunker) was an underground concrete structure originally intended to be a temporary air-raid shelter for Adolf Hitler and his guards and servants. It was located behind the large reception hall that was added onto the old Reich Chancellery, in Berlin, Germany, in 1936.

(Note that quote says "located behind", which makes it sound above-ground, but it was an underground bunker).

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Fascism was never defeated, instead the US spread it around until the whole world became fascist.

[–] Napster153@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Nuremberg was a whole job fair for the West

[–] redwattlebird@thelemmy.club 41 points 1 day ago

The cost keeps increasing. That's hilarious.

But of course he was building a bunker. There's literally no surprises there. It'll be the new den of rape for sure.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This won't be finished in time for him to use it so I guess someone else is pushing for the bunker and they decided to put a ballroom on top to get his approval.

[–] Napster153@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

That's what concerns me. There's a whole ring of supermasters we're not in the know. It wouldn't surprise me if Bibi is just another front.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Or perhaps the contractors involved are giving him or his associates kickbacks from a construction scam, so, it doesn’t need to be finished ever for him to benefit.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 14 hours ago

I think Trump is actually excited about the ballroom which makes it even sadder that some people are using it to control him like a baby.

[–] Small_Quasar@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Oh, that's definitely happening, regardless of anything else. I bet you Washington has started including necessary corruption in cost analysis the same way Banana Republics do.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 7 points 19 hours ago

I bet they don't even pour the foundation while he still president/alive.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 18 hours ago

When the bombs start flying, lock him outside. Ignore him as he pounds on the door, then runs around the building, banging on the windows, trying to make eye contact with those inside.

"Will someone draw the curtains, please?"

[–] QueenMidna@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's not a bunker, it's a data center. Just a hardened one.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 310 points 1 day ago (15 children)

So he is building his own Fuhrer bunker.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

It's more like a Führer rape dungeon, knowing the Epstein files.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] immobile7801@piefed.social 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I honestly thought there was already a bunker under the WH. Too many movies I guess.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

There was a bunker, it was under the East Wing...

After the U.S. entered World War II, Roosevelt, seeing the need to house additional staff and offices to reflect the growing complexity of the federal government at the time, oversaw the addition of the East Wing in 1942, according to the White House.

The two-story structure was built atop the Presidential Emergency Operations Center, or PEOC, a secure bunker that was built by FDR to serve as a secure meeting place in the event of an emergency.

“While the exact specification of this underground presidential bunker is classified,” according to the White House, “it was originally built to withstand a direct nuclear hit. Access to the PEOC is by an elevator located behind multiple vault-type doors with biometric access control systems.”

https://www.militarytimes.com/veterans/military-history/2025/10/21/the-wwii-origins-of-the-now-demolished-east-wing-of-the-white-house/

He almost certainly got just far enough to compromise the security of the existing bunker, and now won't be able to build the new one in time.

It explains why he's so fucking obsessed with the ballroom

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 17 points 20 hours ago

That's for war, this one is for child rape.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There absolutely is along with some of the best medical facilities in the world and more food and weapons than anywhere else nearby, they just tend to put POTUS on AF1 to stay mobile during duress but that place is a fortress on top of a bunker fortress.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›