this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
195 points (95.8% liked)

politics

29166 readers
3764 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Moderate" Democrats sure love being on their knees.

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago
[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 16 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Yet we'll get yelled at for not supporting this scumbag.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Nobody that matters will condemn you for supporting a progressive. Fuck this guy.

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Just wait till he's the nominee then we get brigaded with "You either vote and support him or you're no better than Hitler!!!"

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

The simple truth is if he's an option in a primary, then I'd be voting for a better candidate.

If he's the Democratic option and my choice is him or voting for fascism, well, I'll vote for him in a heartbeat. Because I don't support fascism.

But I'll do what I can with my vote in the primary, first.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 11 hours ago

Trolls like that don't matter.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

In a primary? Nah.

If he made it into the general as the non-fascist candidate? Yeah.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works -1 points 16 hours ago

Such a Russian bot thing to say. By calling you not a person, I'm getting you to vote for harm reduction.

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

As he should, Israel is much worse !

[–] aproposnix@scribe.disroot.org 106 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If he runs for president, he should run as a republican. At least he can pull the overton window towards the center more.

Edit: corrected "overturn"

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He's going to be out in front with every national media apparatus screaming "Electable" and "Do you want another four years of Trump?"

No idea if he can win, but he's got all the right friends to make it happen. A real Hillary Campaign for 2028.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

“Do you want another four years of Trump?”

This presupposes a term-limited Trump would be on the ballot anyway. Yes, the anti-American traitors are trying to make that happen, but that doesn't mean we should help them normalize it!

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] aproposnix@scribe.disroot.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol sorry but I always have issues with autocorrect on heliboard.

[–] nile_istic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Random, but if you use gesture typing in heliboard, they're trying to build their own open-source gesture library. You can help build it (and maybe improve the autocorrect to a degree). I think you go to settings, and there's a tab for "gesture data gathering".

[–] aproposnix@scribe.disroot.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think I might be a little too old school. I can't stand gesture writing. I always find it ultra confusing. Maybe caused by my dyslexia?

[–] nile_istic@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Lol fair enough. My husband is the same, though not dyslexic. I can def imagine dyslexia would make it difficult though.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Aipac givin gavin guidance

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

I regret ever considering him to be a viable presidential candidate.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago

"Spineless bitch regrets calling a spade a spade"

Fixed that headline for you

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Never, never ever, regret the truth.

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 51 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"Regrets" his words after AIPAC privately showed him how easily they could crush him politically if he didn't change course.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Donors will abandon hmi for not supporting Israel. Voters will abandon him for supporting apartheid & genocide.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

But it's antisemitic to say AIPAC has a large influence in US politics.

Uh-oh, just got a notification that my credit score went down.

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Or how he could become a victim of "more sad" syndrome

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

This is what he felt the need to apologize for:

“A lot of Democrats have looked at the Netanyahu regime and felt like, you know what, we don’t like his trajectory; that it’s time to rethink the U.S. relationship with Israel, especially military support,” Vietor said.

Newsom responded:

“The issue of Bibi (Netanyahu) is interesting because he’s got his own domestic issues. He’s trying to stay out of jail. He’s got an election coming up. He’s potentially on the ropes. He’s got folks, the hard line, that want to annex the West Bank. Friedman and others are talking about it appropriately as sort of an apartheid state.”

Co-host Jon Favreau then pressed him directly:

“Do you think, looking down the road, that the United States should consider maybe rethinking our military support for Israel?”

Newsom answered:

“It breaks my heart, because the current leadership in Israel is walking us down that path where I don’t think you have a choice but that consideration.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/newsom-questions-u-alliance-israel-204355476.html

He's not even allowed to say that some day things might hypothetically get bad enough where they may need to consider not funding Israels genocides with a blank check...

He shouldn't hold any sort of political office.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

milquetoast bitch of a man. pathetic.

Unless his reasoning is that it was just apartheid before and is full blown genocide now, he's wrong. They've been running on apartheid my entire life.

[–] Shamber@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm actually surprised by the people who actually think he's a good guy just cause he trolls Trump, he's just another piece of shit who is bending over to you know who, and dropping trou...

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago

He looks like the kind of guy to go fly fishing on the weekends.

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

He almost had a spine

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Seems like timing is a bit early to move to "center" for the general, Gavin, seeing as how we haven't had 2028 presidential election primaries yet.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

He's running for campaign donations.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Feels like these politicians are either (1) extremely bad at reading the room or (2) they are making sure they have a space in the next stage of fascist takeover and realize it's pointless to try to appeal to the MASSIVE anti Israel polling in the Democratic party AND this country.

It felt like they were leaning into Liberal Zionism with a taste of "Benjamin Netanyahu is the problem" so they could call it a genocide.

But, now, the slimiest of these politicians like Gavin Newsom are going in complete reverse to his voters and polls. Feels like they don't even have to consider the voters. They're not speaking to us at all.

I try not to assume they are stupid. It's too simple. They are doing this for a selfish reason to maintain some sense of position or at least not be rounded up with the rest of us.

[–] 4_degrees@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago
[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Do you think if you put a big enough check on a fish hook and dangled it above him, maybe he'd jump?