A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
Remember they exonerated Israeli IDF rapists and then gave then Medals on live television and they are now celebrated figures in Israel.
The entire culture is sick to the fucking core.
They were also celebrating with nooses in the parliament when they passed the death penalty law
“We can rape anyone we want, and if you try to stop us we’ll destroy you.” -Israel
"Stopping us from raping anyone is anti-Semitic! Remember the Holocaust!"
"It's not fair! We got genocided back then, so it's our turn now!"
And POTUS
Maybe this will Streisand effect the reality of the Israeli rapes.
WHAT? ISRAEL HAS BEEN RAPING PALESTINIAN PRISONERS?
Hopefully the new York Times hs to present a lot of evidence and they don't settle to bury everything
Israel is trying to figure out what victims snitched so they can kill them and their families. They're not stupid enough to think they could win money, they just want discovery so they can teach those Palestinians a lesson for speaking to the media.
Israel to sue New York Times over article truthfully reporting its rape of Palestinians
I mean, there are literally videos of these Nazis raping a prisoner, they went to trial, the that genocidal state let them off without any punishment. After they returned home to parades and a heros welcome. There were actual terrorist raping a prisoner caught on video - then hailed as heros. Really disgusting scums I can't understand why they even sue. For what? Everyone knows your terrorist forces will rape people. You can go watch the video right now. Wild.
ISRAEL
RAPES
AS
A
WEAPON
OF
WAR
AND
GENOCIDE
Get fucked, Zionists.
Is it possible for nations to sue individuals of different nations? Like what court would this be filed under?
Just really shows you how fucking delusional these God damn ghouls in Israel are. The New York Times just carries their water. As is their history they always go to bat for fascist regimes and they love to cover up genocides they've been doing it for a century. Certainly they've been doing it for Israel. Still though, not enough for those God damn demons in the state of Israel.
Sure. Let's go to court and have a mutual discovery session with a public trial.
The judiciary is, by and large, owned and controlled by the ruling class. Don't expect anything resembling justice to come from that system.
IANAL, but the discovery has nothing to do with the judiciary, it's before the judge makes a ruling and it's public.
Correct.
Streisand effect, i trust you
Performative. Israel will never allow for discovery or let any leadership take the stand. Everyday I hope for more dead IDF. Every time a Zionist or any religious fundamentalist dies, the world moves closer to reason.
Religious or not, everyone has a system of beliefs.
If your belief system says it's okay to rape and murder others who don't share your belief system, then your belief system should die.
Atheist Zionists aren't any less insufferable, though.
'Zionist' is separate from 'any religious fundamentalist'. Creative interpretation supports your statement. :)
The irony of suing a Jewish family. Sulzberger Family basically owns NYT
It's not like Israel cares about Jews who refuse to drink the kool-aid.
The claims about dogs seem quite implausible and call into questions the reliability of the rest of the the article, but I'm not sure how Israel actually plans to go from that to reaching the rather high threshold for providing libel in the USA.
The claims about dogs seem quite implausible
How so?
I don't think it's something dogs are physiologically capable of doing, and even if it were, I think it's unlikely that dogs would be trained to do it on command.
Sorry to darken your world a little but rape and forced pregnancy are just things we do as a species. From pigs to horses, to enslaved people. We've been force breeding domesticated animals for longer than we've have had civilization. Yes we know how to make them hard and they and can be trained them to rape each other on command. That's how puppy mills work. All you have to do is force a human being to be in the place of a female animal being impregnated.
Klaus Barbie did it to Jews during the Holocaust.
Well don't look up the toy box killer if you want to continue to believe that.
Another victim, Angelica Montano, came forward with a similar story to that of Vigil. She said she had been held captive by Ray after Hendy invited her to the house to pick up a cake mix.
... Montano convinced the pair to release her along the highway. She was picked up by an off-duty law enforcement officer and told him what happened, but he did not believe her and left her at a bus stop. She also later called the police about the incident, but there had been no follow-up.
Yep, sounds about right.
Probably best to give a content warning on that one, at least two of the investigators working on that case killed themselves over how fucked up it was. Really recommend giving it a miss.
What the fuck is their standing? Reputational damage of a country? Libel against a country? That isn't a thing.
Hope NYT can SLAPP their asses.
That's what I was thinking. In what country can a foreign country sue you in your own country?