this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
77 points (95.3% liked)

News

37639 readers
1489 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 40 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

"This is definitely happening because AI technology is just so good and definitely, definitely not because a long series of catastrophically stupid decisions by oligarchs and their elected lackeys has led to massive dysfunctions in the global economy, so all you little people out there definitely want to keep investing! Now excuse me while I go make a completely regular and non-urgent call to my broker..."

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, the article only compares "all occupations" and their flagged "AI sensitive - healthcare" which is a terrible comparison. Anyone paying attention to the job market knows that Healthcare has been basically carrying the job market recently. A fair comparison would exclude Healthcare on both sides. I suspect without Healthcare in the "all occupations" we'd see low to negative growth too.

Basically, the job market has been stagnant and/or shrinking in everything except Healthcare. When everyone is tightening their belt, sales/secrataries/assistant roles will probably feel it first.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 18 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Haven't read it yet, but I'll share my instant reaction to the headline.

"Oh, now that it is hitting the management, finance, and business jobs, you notice it? The people who kept you all in business (I.T., software engineering, etc.) Who've been fired constantly for four fucking years don't count, do they?"

This really needs to be in "leopards ate my face"

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 6 points 10 hours ago

Any IT outfit not run by fucking idiots hasn't replaced competent staff with AI.

Lot of fucking idiots out there though...

[–] GeekyOnion@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago

How apropos. How apropos

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That was what the AI lovers promised. Use AI to hire fewer people. This is not surprising, except in that maybe it's unexpected the companies using AI didn't fail yet.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

It's literally their only pathway to even breaking even on the >$1 trillion capex. The only way any of these valuations make sense is if it lets them fire a huge chunk of workers

And there will be massive hiring drives in a year or so, at lower wages to replace them after the bubble bursts. It's disaster economics 101.