First one’s free. It’s an addiction mechanic trying to exploit your psychology that should be illegal.
this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
52 points (96.4% liked)
Ask Lemmy
39597 readers
1448 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It’s called a hook.
And yes it’s intentional by the algorithm to keep you engaged.
Just like a slot machine. Good ol visual drugs.
Sounds like a bad algorithm that drops you like a hot potato instead of, say, gradually decreasing your numbers though, no?
That’s kinda the point.
You’ll spent a disproportionate amount of energy trying to create content to hit that same dopamine hit it just gave you, it won’t push your content, after a bit you might get better numbers but overall nothing close to the initial one, you’d feel okay with that plateau, then another spike on a random video, and then back to the shallow waters with you so you can continue chasing shadows.
It’s an engagement trap distilled to a science, and I recommend avoiding it like the… something worse than a plague because that analogy apparently didn’t go all that well.
So OP can expect more spikes in the future? I was working under the assumption that it's only the first video that is pushed (because that's what OP described). That does make the whole scenario more plausible. (I know how dopamine traps work in principle, that's why I'm not on tiktok)
That line of thought is precisely why people engage with it and wait for that next hit.
Best suggestion I can offer is: don’t.
Well yes, I'm trying to work out what exactly they're doing and what it is that OP is seeing because I have no experience with tiktok (and I don't want to).
First time doing drugs then?
Huh?
They have a lot of other people to hook and you can' give every one inflated views.
Yep.
It’s mostly fake. But it’s all deliberate.
When you use TikTok, remember that.
These algorithms have already been compromised by AI-generated videos. It's time to move to the Fediverse, where you can pick a server with rules and content that match your preferences—or create your own. That's better suited for experienced users, but the real challenge is that most people struggle to decide what they want to see in their feeds 😅
The real challenge is the lack of audience. 50 views would be something to celebrate on a federated video platform. There is no discoverability here
We are already on lemmy
As it happens, the person you replied to isn't on Lemmy -- nord.pub is running Piefed 1.7.0.
Most likely they throw the first one in a wide net to see what reaction it gets. Then if there isn't much engagement it won't push newer content as much.
If you're asking whether someone at tiktok HQ saw your success and was green with envy and said "nope, we're not showing that person's videos to people anymore" and flipped a switch to hide your videos, then no.
yep, but here's the thing: why wouldn't TikTok do that? They give you a dopamine hit just so you get hooked and always chasing to get that high again? Sounds likely to me.
Ah, I see. That I don't know, I have successfully avoided tiktok like the plague (because I know my brain would just overdose on the dopamine). But I suspect that if that were how they run things, we'd see a lot more complaints like yours. Also, such blunt mechanisms tend to leak and be reported on, especially when a service comes under close scrutiny as tiktok has. So just based on my experience with how the internet works, I doubt it.
Edit: I may have made some wrong assumptions when I wrote this, idk.