this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
778 points (94.7% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3215 readers
736 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago

Spoiler: Democratic politicians wanted 80% of what Trump did. The 20% they didn't want was all him going after his democratic enemies ... but they take the bad with the "good".

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

This is part of what just erodes the hope out of me. We all know there are periods of regression and periods of progress, but whatever damage is caused by the regression period is

1- Caused much more quickly than any progress.

2- Is usually beneficial to the ruling class, thus they have less of an incentive to fix it.

3- Might just become normalized, at which point you're just starting from square one all over again.

Like, age/identity verification. We are in a period of mass and widespread regression right now and age verification is making progress, eroding freedom and privacy on the internet. Do you think that when we enter the period of progress, the age verification systems of today will just be reverted? Fuck no. They'll stay. They'll become normal. And the fight against them will need to start from scratch, with an ever bigger amount of opposition.

I'm really jealous of the people who can maintain hope.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 52 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Only in amurica would they sell people on the right to be fired for no reason and call it "right to work"

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Welcome to the age of bad faith laws! Because if they were honest, they couldn't lifestyle market conservatism to "people who like tradition".

[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Getting fired is right to work. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

They call trusting your ignorance "faith" and its something you absolutely need lol

[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The termination for any reason is at-will employment, aka "will to work". With that being said your point still stands because "right to work" is an anti union law that guarantees an employees right to refrain from being part of a union (lol)

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

At-will employment and "right-to-work" are distinct ideas. The first has some real benefits, while the other is just union-busting bullshit.

At-Will Employment means that the relationship of employee to employer is technically voluntary. Your employer can fire you or lay you off for almost any reason or no reason, but you are likewise free to just walk away without even finishing your shift and get another job. (Non-discrimination laws and professional continuity-of-care rules are common exceptions.)

Right to work doesn't affect whether or not your employement relationship is voluntary. Instead, it means only and exclusively that you can freeload off the union, getting all of their benefits and leaving them with all of the expenses of negotiating your salary and work rules.

In the USA most (but not all) states are "at-will employment", and most red states have the same sort of bullshit anti-worker "right to work" laws that MLK was campaigning against when he was murdered. And, unfortunately, thanks to SCOTUS fuckery all of the USA is essentially "right to work" since the same assholes behind "corporations are people" and "money is speech" decided that payroll deductions for union dues are terrible in way that payroll deductions for taxes or insurance aren't.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The problem with at-will is the unequal relationship corporations and employees have. If I, as an employee, simply walk off the job, that hurts my chances of employment at other corporations. A company, however, will never see any consequence no matter how badly they treat employees.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Exactly. You can walk away and get evicted and starve vs. they can make you walk away and get evicted and starve… This is what constitutes fairness by modern democratic standards, apparently.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 19 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Didn't Biden undo a lot of shit that Trump has done during his first term?

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago

His repeated platform was to raise the minimum wage.

So... here we are. Ds couldn't be bothered.

BoTh of our parties should be dismantled, our "labor party" is shit, just like our "limited government" party.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 19 points 15 hours ago

Performatively he did, then reinstated most of what he dropped. Did nothing with his tax cuts for the rich, which checks out, as VP he worked directly with McConnel to muster votes to make the bush tax cuts for the rich permanent. He kept his border policies, war policies, etc. Continued to lie about the condition of the economy. Blue Fascism is a close relative of the red version

[–] Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Why change the system when there is so much money to be made...

Political corruption is now embedded so deeply into the American system.

Foreign nations buy politicians, rich buy policies. The supreme court are now an extension of the republican party and those free holidays sure do help also they have jobs for life.

The president could nuke every blue state in America and not commit a crime.

It's fucked, it's a platform for dictatorship and corruption and political funding and grift has exacerbated it. Of course a party that has languished in powerless opposition isn't going to give any of that up. Of course they won't stop themselves insider trading.

And the military, they pledge a meaningless oath and are too weak to put an end to a tyrannical system.

[–] Schadrach 12 points 16 hours ago

Of course there are two parties. They create the illusion of choice necessary for the political ratchet - one party to drive things to the right, the other as controlled opposition to obstruct movement back to the left.

[–] tooks@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I fear Dems will see just how easily we've bent over for the current administration, and realize they can get away with it too. I've said it ad nauseam -- when did we decide to start trusting the government? Any government? I'm right in the middle of my expected lifespan, and I never once trusted my government. Why would I? They've done nothing positive for my generation, and every slight success is quickly dismissed or disqualified by the next dipshit with deep enough pockets to rule the land. This isn't democracy, and it never has been. The "people's vote" has never mattered. It's just another smoke surrounded mirror providing the illusion that democracy exists. Hell, the only reason the word democracy probably exists in our history is to make us believe that such an impossibility is reality. Mark my words and those of others, the only difference between the two parties? One is full of fascist, pedophile, sex offenders and the other is full of fascist, pedophile, sex offenders. The female leaders in both parties are just enablers, otherwise they wouldn't put up with the shit and take to the streets. Same for our more diverse leaders. If they rock the boat too hard, they're out a paycheck and some sweet, sweet insider trading. The whole system is dead, and I fear revolution is the only answer to the madness. But we've become too complacent and docile to fight. We're too busy trying to make ends meet to have the necessary reserve energy to fight for rights which probably never truly mattered in the first place. Just stuff written down that **we're **advised to follow or face penalties. None of the people in power ever follow their own rules or the rules commanded by the people. When I say we are doomed to the point of extinction, I mean we are DOOMED. There's just no way for even the lamest human to find any reliability, accountability, or faith in governments that have outwardly shouted that they're not to be trusted and could give a shit about your life.

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

love the righteous anger but you gotta try to stay positive my bru

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 10 hours ago

Sounds positive to me!

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

I have concluded that the Established Democrats would rather that Trump or somebody like him is POTUS than to concede to the Left on anything, even on a morally highly charged subject like the mass murdering of tens of thousand of children (in Gaza) which at least for some people would make the Democrat candidate so repugnant that they couldn't bring themselves to vote for her even "to stop Trump"

Had Kamala genuinelly conceded to the Left on some things and not latched on to none other than the Cheney familly (honestly, I don't thing the Israeli subject was by itself enough to cause that loss), she could very well have won, but that faction of the Democrats would rather loose than stop cozing with the hard-right, so they lost to none other than Trump.

If what the Democrat tribalists were parroting back them about how Trump was so horrible and the Democrats needed to win to stop his policies was indeed how the Established Democrats felt, they would NEVER had risked a Trump victory by adopting a Reject The Left strategy at all levels.

All this to say that these people will never undo what Trump did to the broader society (though the parts that make them less electable - i.e. that affect their own personal upsides - I'm sure they'll undo) because they're totally fine with it, as shown by how in the last election they would rather risk a second Trump presidency to keep on going Right politically than to pivot Left in the slightest of ways.

Without a Revolution inside the Democrat Party, the US will keep on going in the same direction as these Democrats will do nothing but talkie-talkie on reversing Trump's policies and then in a few years another Trump character (or, worse, a genuinelly intelligent one) get in power again.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›