this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
254 points (99.2% liked)

politics

29789 readers
1811 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Well of course they should pay for their own power!! They’re private companies! What am I missing here?

“ Data centers must pay for the grid upgrades they require and can’t siphon power from existing power plants, according to the bill. It also directs the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to update its rules related to transmission lines — which transport electricity — to allow data centers to reduce demand during peak energy hours. “

This seems reasonable to me.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 8 points 26 minutes ago

How is this not the default?

We are doomed, what a bunch of clowns

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 22 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Pay!? Make them BUILD 2x the capacity they need and give the rest away to the grid. Don't let them get away with using money to escape the social consequences of their choices. The responsibility to ensure they have no impact should be forced to be theirs and theirs alone.

Write laws that make them cease to exist if they don't do this.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 hour ago

Given we have the technology, any new construction should be required to be environmentally neutral at a minimum, ideally with ongoing improvement.

If they need to use millions of gallons of groundwater? Great, go fucking wild, but directly fund managed aquifer recharge projects to replace that groundwater at an equal or greater rate.

Increases in resource consumption should be covered entirely by the data center plus improvements to benefit the community.

No longer should big business be used as a means to siphon the value of labor and natural resources and concentrate it for selfish use by the worst of humanity.

[–] wide_eyed_stupid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

I don't get it. Why aren't they already paying for their power? Why is this bill necessary? It sounds like common fucking sense to me, so why isn't that the default?

So who's paying for their power now?

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They do pay for their power. The bill would require them to pay for grid upgrades that their usage makes necessary.

[–] wide_eyed_stupid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Well yeah, but my question was: why does this need a bill at all? By default they should pay for their own shit.

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 2 points 51 minutes ago

At least my provider, when they need to build a new plant or do capacity upgrades, they get the PSC to give them blanket increases in service charge or kWh-rate, on the basis that everybody contributes to the higher demand. Now we've got single customers claiming they want the full output of two or three power plants, and why should I pay the mortgage on those plants for 20 years? When the data center will be gone in 5?

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I hear data centers are exceedingly vulnerable to sabotage

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago

You mean vulnerable to power outages? Because "sabotage" would be illegal and all of that

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago

Do water too.

[–] randompasta@lemmy.today 51 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck it. Make them use renewables as well.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 36 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

One step further.

Data centers must provide more clean energy to the grid than they remove.

[–] nullify3112@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Trying to think of a monkey’s paw situation :

The AI companies would nuke cities to change the other side of the equation.

Edit: that doesn’t work.

They would nuke the solar panels not on their property. They don’t need to provide any renewable energy if they don’t draw in any.

[–] TheGoldenV@lemmy.world 41 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

How about pay for ALL the power?

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 15 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Nah, I think we should give them all the power. All at once.

[–] Elshender@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)
[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Well if we deliver too much power all at once it'll.... Ooooooooooh.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It amazes me that they don’t. You’d think it would be ideal in fact so they can be self sufficient.

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 hours ago

It's way more complicated to build a GW-scale power plant than a GW-scale data center, mostly because the power plant is subject to environmental studies, fuel supply, etc, so a DC looking for investors that can just say they're going to build a big warehouse, fill it with computers, and get electricity, magically, from the local utility, gets to outsource the hardest problem, and stands a better chance of getting their funding (regardless of whether they actually build anything).

I forget where I keep seeing that some huge fraction of proposed DCs will/are never built, suggesting that many of them are just investor scams. Showing their work on power supply would (presumably) make the scam harder to run.

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Schiff Proposes Bill Requiring Easy Mode Copper Mines to Pay for Own Power

[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 hours ago

And water too! Especially if they waste it!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Lousy dEmOCrAtZ fascist lite GeNoSiDEee

down with the oppressor bourgeoise swine-pigs! I know everything about the American politics! voting is a scam! Newsome is evil genosider! Etc etc

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

My company already does this.