this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
453 points (99.6% liked)

196

6264 readers
1853 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] froufox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 minutes ago

i would prevent 10/12

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago

Reminds me of Capricorn One (1977)

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 3 points 1 hour ago

Too close in time. I'd go back and make Abraham eat lithium... or kill him when he was an child.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

If I had time travel I would prevent the big bang - or, at least, prevent the universe settling down and becoming friendly to life.

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I don't think you could even theoretically reach so far back. You can't time travel to where time did not exist

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 34 minutes ago

to a moment after the big bang then

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (2 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 10 points 1 hour ago

"In the beginning the Universe was created. This had made many people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move."

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] Shellbeach@lemmy.world 2 points 44 minutes ago
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 26 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

why time travel when there are brutal dictators today? You can always buy a plane ticket.

[–] lauha@lemmy.world 18 points 5 hours ago

Because with time travel you can travel to a time before they are important and under highest security, say when they are 20-years-old and just walking down the street.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 26 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

don't worry guys, I just came back from the past, I killed baby Hess Von Macher. the whole German fascism that invaded Poland and killed a hundred thousand people in concentration camps has never happened. y'all welcome.

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 6 hours ago

You're not going to believe this, but...

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 8 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I want to go back in time and snuff out that first ameoba.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 hours ago

You'll have to fight Q for it while Picard watched

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago

Meiosis was a mistake.

[–] mr_account@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I would have a Lovecraftian statue carved out of some sturdy, semi-rare material that can stand the test of time, and bury it in Antarctica tens of thousands of years before homosapiens evolved. Then in present day I would wait...

We can do better than that if we want to abuse a time machine to forge Lovecraftian horror!

I would use my time machine to steal Neil Armstrong's corpse from his funeral and then dump it right at the landing site of Apollo 11. First thing Neil sees when he hops onto the lunar surface? His own aged corpse.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Why wait when you could just go to the point of discovery?

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You need it to be propery aged for carbon dating and shit.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

How old does carbon need to be before you can legally date it?

Asking for a friend.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Atoms don't age. They don't mature, and they don't change with time. Unstable isotopes decay at random, but the decay probability never changes.

So you can legally date carbon that's 0 years old, if you find any. Most carbon will be much older than you.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

How do you know how old all of my carbon is?

I mean, my friend's carbon?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Christ, imagine this being the good timeline.

[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

One head canon I like:

This actually is a good timeline. And our timeline actually has been heavily altered by time travelers! People have actually tried and succeeded at changing the past.

But time travel isn't like in movies. This isn't one of those stories where you go back, change something, and then you come back and everything is a little different. No. In this version of time travel, we get maximum butterfly effect. Going years into the past doesn't just alter history, it completely rewrites it. Go back a hundred years and hang out on a random spot in Antarctica for five minutes, never interacting with another living being? Your presence for that short time will be enough to subtly alter air flows, which will butterfly up to entirely different storms forming in different times and places. Which means that almost everyone born in the last 100 years simply never existed. An entirely new populace is born. No matter how trivial a change you make, any travel beyond a certain length of time into the past results in a complete historical reset.

This is fundamentally not something you can fine-tune. It's not physically possible to go into the past and make a tiny alteration. Every trip is an entirely new spin on the historical roulette wheel. Every trip completely remakes the world.

As such, there's only one practical application of time travel - preventing world-shattering disasters. For example, you could use it to undue a nuclear war. Going back to prevent this apocalypse will result in erasing everyone currently alive, but almost everyone is already dead, so little consequence. Same thing for species-destroying plagues, giant asteroid impacts, etc. Because every trip is a historical reset, it's only useful for scenarios where you're content on just wiping all current people from existence. Even the Holocaust doesn't come remotely close to the level of calamity necessary to justify time travel.

[–] mokus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago

You don’t even need humans doing the travel. You just send a 10 kg rock on a one-way trip back and get all the same effects.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

No, I was implying that reality simply branched. Specifically when Bowie died, if you're curious.

But back to your hypothesis: if all of the future is rewritten by travel into the past, then the travel to the past shall not have happened. How do you reconcile this paradox?

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 41 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but now these two are hounding you

[–] Lydia_K@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

They're always on time.

[–] AskMeForADickPic@lemmy.world 29 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

So it's this guys fault we exist in this shitty trump time line

[–] morto@piefed.social 21 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Plot twist: we're already in the less shitty timeline, as unbelievable as it can be.

[–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Wouldn’t it be depressing if this were the best timeline?

Ah, well, Golden Ages are defined by what comes before and after them I guess

the implication is that this is the best possible timeline.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 hours ago

I knew they faked the moon landing for a reason