this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
95 points (99.0% liked)

politics

29912 readers
1861 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NBC News projects that Paxton, who received a late endorsement from Trump, will advance to the general election to face Democrat James Talarico.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has defeated Sen. John Cornyn for the Republican Senate nomination, NBC News projects, the latest challenger backed by Donald Trump to unseat an incumbent.

Paxton will face Democratic state Rep. James Talarico in a November race that could become key to the fight for the Senate majority.

Trump endorsed Paxton last week, giving him a last-minute boost in his bid to oust Cornyn, who has been in the Senate since 2003. Cornyn and Paxton faced off Tuesday in a head-to-head runoff after no candidate won more than 50% of the vote in the initial multicandidate March primary.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 82 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ken Paxton was impeached on 20 counts of abuse of office. Texas really doesn't have any better person to advance in the Republican primaries.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 days ago

I mean, who better to represent Texas?

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 42 points 4 days ago

"And somehow, things got worse"

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Its a bit of an aside but watching Jasmine Crockett go on to endorse Corey Bell, AIPAC super-fan, in the Bush/ Bell primary (MO-01), and also watching her revel in the Hassan supoena; it tells me DNC voters in Texas made the right choice regarding Talarico.

Democratic turn out in primaries has been way up with more informed electorates over all, generally but not always, picking better candidates. RNC turn out is down, with only the core cult showing up, so maybe this is an expected result. Rather than looking to reform the RNC, former Trump voters are abandoning electoral politics for the time being?

It makes me wonder how viable these low-energy Trump picks will be in a general. Trumps ability to drive turn out has never translated to other candidates, and they've never been weaker than they are now. I don't think Dem's in Texas could as for a better shot.

[–] TuEstUnePommeDeTerre@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Corey Bell

Genocide supporter Wesley Bell
Progressive Cori Bush

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Sorry was pooping my whole butt out when I was typing that out.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

Shit this one is going to cost AIPAC some serious money.

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

As a Canadian, the fact that a Trump endorsement still helps candidates win, shows me that this is still what Americans want.

Trump isn't the hero Americans need, but he's the one they deserve.

[–] growsomethinggood@reddthat.com 36 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You're not incorrect to feel that way, but for context, this is a republican primary. The only people voting for this are the ones without enough shame to have changed their party affiliation in the past 1-10 years, so there's definitely a sampling bias in these specific results. We won't know what the rest of the voters want until November.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 20 points 4 days ago

We won’t know what the rest of the voters want until November.

This the same state that keeps re-electing Raphael Cruz.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

In Texas we can vote in either party's primary. The only restriction is that you can only vote in the runoff for the party for which you initially voted. It's not uncommon for Democrats to vote in the Republican primary to choose a least worst candidate or the one they believe is more likely to lose in November. Theres currently a feeling that Talarico is more likely to beat Paxton than Cornyn. This carries over to other states, with the maga crowd (who's more likely to participate in primaries/runoffs) putting trump-endorsed candidates on the ballot and that these candidates are more likely to lose in November.

[–] Pavidus@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I live in the southern US, and I am shocked to still see the political billboards that state "Endorsed by Trump." I thought for sure those endorsements were a thing of the past this year. Turns out, you're absolutely right.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago

He very well could have won without it.

Now that he's set, I expect Paxton to use his position to get one of the friendlier courts to let him block fundraising that could benefit Talarico. Assuming he's already plotting convenient criminal "investigations" focused on him and/or his family members.