No Olympic athlete is non enhanced
this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
646 points (99.5% liked)
People Twitter
10010 readers
843 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Let’s be real, the regular Olympics are already doped. Their entire careers are on the line with the pride (and eyes) of the nation bearing down on them and demanding results… and we think they and their teams aren’t taking every edge they think they can possibly get away with? All the time famous athletes of yesteryear are being revealed to have been up to shenanigans when science catches up to retest their samples more effectively or some investigation gets a co-conspirator to spill the beans.
There’s microdosing below what tests can detect, novel designer drugs that can’t yet be detected, therapeutic use exemptions for drugs that would normally be banned, setting up situations to evade tests unless you are prepared to take them, tampering with the sample, good old fashioned corruption… probably tons of things that would never occur to me but that would to highly motivated teams with vast amounts of money on the line.
You just demonstrated why Hunter won.
Your comment indicates its all drugsdrugs drugs. Nope. It's years of training and dedication, sacrifice and absolute laser guided focus.
You cant dope your way to a skillset and discipline you don't have.
I explicitly said they are searching for EVERY edge they think they can get. That includes insane hard work and practice. The hard-training Olympian who is doped will easily crush someone who is doped but just sitting around eating bon bons. Actually many agents people dope with are used because they allow people to train harder for longer and recover more quickly which is invaluable as an athlete. Saying that many athletes are doping is saying many don’t have integrity, not that they don’t work hard - that couldn’t be further from the truth at the Olympic level.
There's a book, The Sports Gene by David Epstein, that talks about elite level sports performance and the extent to which improvement in different sports is trainable or innate, which are social/cultural, and which have feedback loops to make sport performance a combination of all of the above.
Major league baseball players have very high visual acuity (including/especially much more precise visual determination of distance, like a rangefinder). NBA players are tall, and everyone knows that, but someone surprising is that most of them have much longer arms than even the people of the same height. Olympic high jumpers have tendon attachment points that are especially conducive to jumping high. Many world class marathoners come from ethnic groups that have certain genetic adaptations that help increase red blood count, especially in response to high altitude living (while also having the environmental benefits of living at high altitude in their childhoods and growing up in a culture of running every day as children).
What's interesting, though, is that there may be different genetic or physiological reasons for an untrained person's baseline ability, how quickly their body adapts to training, and where the plateau happens for that particular training. There are people who are naturally high performing, others who might be very responsive to training, and others still who have high ceilings so that they can reach the highest levels with sufficient training.
Drugs will only help with certain adaptations, and can't help with others. There isn't a drug that a 25-year-old can take to make him taller, or to make his Achilles tendon attach at a different point. Drugs probably don't help with hand eye coordination, reaction time, or strategic decisions.
This particular event shows that big muscles may actually hinder swimming ability, so taking drugs to make your muscles bigger might hurt your performance.
So it depends on the sport. I'd expect doping to provide very little advantage in some sports that involve a lot of technique or strategy. And I think swimming is a sport where performance depends heavily on technique, especially at sprint distances.
The drugs at play aren’t limited to androgens. For example in swimming many people have been busted for Methylhexaneamine, a performance enhancing stimulant.
Everyone is looking to shave off any time they can. Just taking drugs alone definitely isn’t enough to put you at the Olympic level. But if you have trained and trained relentlessly and have those sorts of passive genetic advantages you mentioned for your flavor of sport… that may not be enough to assure victory. You can expect your top opponents have similar advantages, since in a world of billions of people who are more mobile than they used to be you are likely not the only person with those particular in-born genetic advantages who trained a ton and has a good strategy… what can you do to get even the slightest edge?
Exactly, there's tons of dudes who hop on gear and think it's instantly gonna solve all their problems. However, they never optimized their training or reached their natural potential in the first place. They either end up spinning their wheels, burning out and growing man boobs or gaining a little and thinking they're Superman (and probably growing man boobs too).
You actually see it spread even broader - people thinking they can cheese the hard grind. If i get this equipment i can run longer / ride faster / play better and now we're at the point where people think feeding gibberish into a plageurism machine means they can now Art without effort.
Nope. Stuff can help and it can elevate, sure...but there's gotta be the skill underneath. And you need to work for that.
At that level, first there's a shit load of work and deprivation and raw talent honed in countless hours of training, sometimes through injuries and pain. You make it sound like it's all about the drugs and the cheating, I say there's titanic amounts of work to be done just to get to be able to cheat. To keep to your edge metaphor: step 1 to 99 are forging the sword.
I remember someone suggesting that for all Olympic disciplines we should first select a member of the public and let them attempt it. 100m dash. High jump. Walking across the narrow beam. Doing one pull up on the parallel bars. I bet we would appreciate those athletes more afterwards.
I'm not condoning cheating, to be sure, and I've been around for long enough to see this arms race unfold, in cyclism and tennis especially. Athletes are human, and the desire to win sometimes surpasses common sense. But even for a total lying cheater like Lance Armstrong I can still appreciate the sheer amount of work he put in to get lto the start of the race. If you dope an average Joe the same way, all they will accomplish is maybe walk faster.
I remember someone suggesting that for all Olympic disciplines we should first select a member of the public and let them attempt it. 100m dash. High jump. Walking across the narrow beam. Doing one pull up on the parallel bars. I bet we would appreciate those athletes more afterwards.
I want to see an Olympics where they just pick people by lottery and grab a bunch of random average 30-50 year olds, have them compete with no training (okay give them like a few hours of training so they can actually give it a real try and don't hurt themselves), then again after 3, 6 and 12 months of training. I feel like that could singlehandedly make a massive difference in public health given the modern sedentary lifestyle by showing people exactly what is possible for an average person who just got off the couch to do
But even for a total lying cheater like Lance Armstrong I can still appreciate the sheer amount of work he put in to get lto the start of the race.
Didn't the people who exposed him also themselves get exposed?
I replied to the other fellow but in no way am I calling them lazy, actually many of the drugs they use allow them to train harder for longer and as an Olympians they take full advantage of that to push the boundaries of what is possible. Those agents aren’t an “I win” button but at the highest levels people will do literally anything to push themselves to be able to shave off even fractions of a second or gain whatever advantage they can, and being able to train more and bounce back quicker is tempting.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Let’s not forget the fact that ones who actually used drugs will be banned from any other competitions for many months or even years.
So, these other athletes are likely not in the “top tier”. It would be good to hear opinion from someone experienced to tell if it’s true.
I am surprised there aren't some swimmers competing that smoke weed on their off times, but don't use PED in general.
It's mostly true. The biggest name from what I've looked into is Ben Proud. He won silver at the 2024 Paris Olympics in the 50m freestyle. But you are largely correct it is majority no names.
Then you didn't look very close, because fucking Hafthor Björnsson competed there
I meant in the swimming, sorry for not clarifying. Though you could absolutely consider only looking at that event not looking very close, but that is why I said from what I've seen and not as a fact of the entire competition.
Though on the other hand you did only offer a single additional name so it doesn't really dispute it being majority no names in my mind. Even 1-2 big names per event would still be pretty much majority no names depending how you define it.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Easy money
The only enhancement he used (but everyone else on the pool was using it too) was a swimming suit so efficient, that it got eventually banned by the IOC for being deemed an unfair advantage. Also, most of the "enhanced" competitors were just returning from retirement, there's only so much you can compensate with steroids.
Oh, and furthermore: jacking up a la Broly is actually a terrible idea for swimming specifically, because the extra bulging muscle is actually inefficient for hydrodynamic drag.
Can confirm, gym / lifting lifestyle makes you in to a shape better suited as a boat anchor than a torpedo. Also probably about as buoyant.
I read an article a little while ago about one of the swimmers who was training for these games and it talked about exactly this, how the changes to his body shape and composition were bigger drawbacks than the added strength from the enhancements.
If this event ends up going for a while and has enough interest I would expect people to figure out an optimal way to dope to find the balance.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(18 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
So did he get disqualified for not using drugs? Would be ironic.
The athletes that openly take drugs to compete in these games will be banned from all other contests, so anyone who is already competitive isn't going to take part.
A top-tier athlete without PEDs is gonna outperform lesser athletes who use them.
I first read it as "enchanted" and for a fleeting moment I was in a world of magical swimmers until I read further and realised what it actually was. It was just like when I first came across "fantasy football" and thought it was about orcs and wizards playing American football.
We need a Blood Bowl of swimming.
load more comments
(5 replies)
And no erratic emotions with an underperforming penis.
Hey, some of us have that without using drugs
I don't know athletes names, and please don't think I am trying to criticise him, but If he is competing in the enhanced games then there would be presumably no testing for enhancing drugs, so we only really have his word that he doesn't use enhancing drugs which may not be the same as actually not using enhancing drugs
They still test because the whole framework relies on verified categories, but I'll admit the optics are hilarious.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Drugs can't compensate for skill and technique.
...this isn't a weird green text meme?
Holy fuck, the Enhanced Games are real? And looking into it, it's backed by Donald Trump Jr and Peter Thiel.
Holy fuck actual dystopian future
load more comments
(9 replies)
Wait, that's a real thing??!!
Aren't we living in the greatest timeline?
I want to watch PCP boxing
Just go to a junkies meeting
Damn transitional people, winning all the medals with their unfair advantages
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›