this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
25 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

27108 readers
266 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm interested in finding out what people think when they see something GNU. What do you associate with it? Do you tend to be more or less interested in the project if.it is GNU or not? What is your perspective?

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 13 points 7 hours ago

Whatever else it might be, it is definitely not Unix.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 13 points 9 hours ago

GNU and libre have the highest level of good thoughts when I see them in relation to technology.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

It's going to have terrible UX, a complete pain to build, the contribution process is going to be some git send-email mailing list nonsense, it's going to expect you to have read the manual (probably in info just to be difficult) cover to cover before you even consider using it.

But on the other hand it probably has at least decent documentation, it probably works reasonably well, and there's zero chance of rug pulls, closed source add-ons, etc.

Overall I would say it has negative connotations. If you said "check out this package manager, Fooly", I'd think "ok might be good, might not". If you said "check out this package manager, GNU Fooly", I would say hell no. It'll be awful.

It's the software equivalent of books that have "how to read this book" sections.

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 1 points 7 hours ago

All in all, we will only have ourselves to blame.

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 15 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Are we talking about the license or about the software collection? GNU is a huge part of Linux operating systems and open source history. I don't have a problem with GNU and don't know why anyone would.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Linux is only the kernel for the OS. GNU is most everything else that makes Linux (GNU Linux) an OS.

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That's why I said "GNU is a huge part of Linux operating systems". Both parts are important for the history of Linux based operating systems.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 hours ago

Oh, I wasn't arguing. I was clarifying for anyone reading the thread and out of the loop.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 23 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think of it as being made by one of few really trustworthy organizations in tech.

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

More trustworthy than Microslop? /s

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago

More trustworthy than Google?

[–] emb@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I generally think of GNU as being foundational (or, old) and principled.

I really appreciate the contributions they've made to both core utilities and especially philosophy.

But I don't see them as lighting up the world or adding anything new lately. I think of vaporware like Hurd with 1000 year dev cycles. I think of them recommending Linux distributions like Trisquel that let perfect be the enemy of pretty good.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

i've used trisquel on my primary machine at some point in the past, it was hassle free and pretty much just ubuntu

[–] emb@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Oh, that's good to hear! Always had the impression that the blob-free distros caused compatibility headaches, but glad to be wrong I suppose.

Edit: And I should say I didn't mean to pick on Trisquel in particular, it was just the one GNU recommended distro I remembered by name.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, Hurd recently made a decent splash. And strictly speaking, it's troubles weren't specifically GNU. Without all the legal quagmire around BSD we would all be on it. Linux would just be some niche hobby project just like Hurd. It was unfortunately a victim of timing. Both in that sense and the direction computing took in the future. Heavy IPC across multiple discrete CPU cores is a bad idea for performance. It works but it's slooooow

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Hurd recently made a decent splash

It did? When? Where?

[–] x74sys@programming.dev 14 points 13 hours ago

GNU is a trusted quality stamp. Me see GNU, me go GET.

[–] Euphoma@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago

If its gnu software it probably has integration with emacs

[–] daeraxa@programming.dev 2 points 12 hours ago

Honestly hard to say. Very much have respect for existing ubiquitous tools and for their copyleft and open source advocacy but they come across as very 'elitist' and reluctant to move to more common open source patterns (for better or worse). Like it seems that contributing to a GNU project seems challenging in needing to get involved with mailing lists and emailing patches etc. Although it seems GUIX uses Codeberg so maybe that stance has softened a bit.

[–] mitram@sopuli.xyz 2 points 14 hours ago

I don't know much about it. All I know is GNU software is somehow important to how Linux works on the low-level layers.