PSG... the team that had to outspend every other team by getting illegal funds from Qatar for years and years before they won anything. Them finally winning only shows that there's not limit to how corrupt football can become. Football truly is the world champion of corrupt sports.
Europe
News and information from Europe πͺπΊ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)
Okay, well that explains them giving an award to Trump then.
I can't find a single policy stance of the Renaissance Party, but tbf I don't parlez franΓ§ais
Wikipedia says they're centre-left-right-center which has been both progressive and conservative while being socially, culturally, and economically liberal, but idk wtf definition of liberal they're even using so that's all gibberish.
Are you American perhaps ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaissance_(French_political_party)
" Renaissance (RE) is a political party in France that is typically described as liberal and centrist] or centre-right."
If you're American you're probably under the misapprehension that "liberal" means "left wing", it doesn't.
If you click on the word liberal in the wiki page it will take you to an explanation of it.
Tl;dr substitute "libertarian" for liberal to get a rough approximation in american of what that sentence means.
They're centre right economically with a positive view towards personal freedoms. Not full Ayn Rand nutbag libertarians. Closer to the sane GOP you don't have any more left of.
The problem is that the right in many countries have taken to using the American definition of liberal. In my country (Estonia), the word "liberast" (basically "libtard" except gay connotation, as pederast is just gay in common parlance here, doesn't matter if the other party is a boy or a grown man) has been thrown around plenty and it's NOT about economic policy, I can tell ya that.
I'm unsurprised to hear that the tech bros are screwing something else up.
Oh that has little to do with tech bros, it's the alt-right wave that started in the early-mid 2010s. I mean Facebook facilitated it quite a bit of course, but it was gonna happen regardless, it's been sponsored by Russia among others.
They are social-liberals. They believe a competitive market economy is required to have a sustainable healthcare and welfare system. They believe in climate change but they don't want extreme measures. They prefer slow measures such as banning plastic or encouraging electric cars. They support Ukraine. They sent aid to Palestine and imposed sanctions on Israeli settlers but don't believe the problems of the Middle East can ever be fixed by outsiders. They support nuclear technology. They support legal abortion. They oppose death penalty.
Leftists see Renaissance as right-wing / extreme-right.
The extreme-right sees them as leftists.
They believe a competitive market economy is required to have a sustainable healthcare and welfare system.
This sentence doesn't make sense to me, or at least the juxtaposition of ideas is confusing. Because my reading is that it means healthcare and welfare systems should be connected to this competitive market economy. But "a competitive market economy welfare system" is just a meaningless word salad, so that can't be exactly what they're talking about.
Or perhaps are they saying that social programs need to be supported by a competitive market economy in other areas? Although I don't agree with that requirement, I think that interpretation at least makes logical sense.
It kind of makes sense in contrast to other systems IMO. Some people advocate for pure socialized healthcare, others want to maintain a mix of socialized and private similar to Germany, and some advocate for pure privatization of healthcare like the USA. To me "competitive market economy" in terms of healthcare and welfare implies the mixed option, but I'm not vouching for them because idk if that's actually what they plan to do regardless of it is what they mean. Given their place on the spectrum they likely want to be vague intentionally so as not to upset either side of the aisle among their constituents.
They believe a competitive market economy is required to have a sustainable healthcare and welfare system.
Capitalism is when the elite has captured markets, removed competition and is making huge profits with their monopolies.
Bringing competition back to healthcare would bring down prices and make it affordable.
Thank you! That all sounds great honestly, but where do they stand on taxing the rich?
Officially, basically taxes are a neccessary evil that should be minimised as much as possible while maintaining enough income to provide necessary infrastructure. Unofficially they seem to favour the rich over the general masses (it's one if the big complaints about Macron - "President for the rich")
Idiocracy
I logically understand rioting when your team loses, but why the fuck would you riot when your team wins?
Because you are looking for any excuse to riot.
You're looking for a thought process where there is none.
how the hell do you logically understand rioting...fucking rioting when your team. loses...gife me a break, holy hell..
such a pathetically stupid mentality be it in sports, or politics. fucking rioting is understandable.... fuck off
There is a difference between understanding a thought process and condoning it. What's next, are you going to tell psychologists to just shoot their patients, because obviously they can't do anything?
fuck off
Calm your tits m8
Why do you mention sports and politics together here?
The pure joy of arsenal losing. "Fuck you Henry! Vaderr Bomb!!!"
Just glad it wasn't Arsenal.
Zut alors! L'houligan!
Seems like the sane type who should be in charge of...something.