the laughing thing only goes so far. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Rubin shame him for being a russian asset.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Parker Sedgwick has a Youtube channel and is pretty good. He could be a voice of his generation if he can manage to sand off his Ben Shapiro-esq energy.
MAGA pundit and influencer Dave Rubin is facing ridicule after struggling to name a single aspect of the economy that has improved since President Donald Trump returned to power last year.
I don't think that's fair. I'd also struggle to name an aspect of the economy that improved under Trump.
Billionaires got richer under Trump.
The Dow reached record highs. Which for most of us means jack shit these days, since even with record earnings corporations are still laying off the workforce in droves
These dopes always say stuff like "I think I read where..." and go on to make a statement that slam dunks their argument, based on the incontrovertible source "I think I read somewhere..." Then you find out they didn't read or hear that anywhere but the Conservative Propaganda Machine, because it isn't true. At all.
🙄 The stock market is not an economic gauge
Even before Steve Jobs created and popularized(poisoned?) the IPO gold rush technique all VC money now attempts to redo with every startup, and before Jack Welch turned every American company into entities that primary gain value through stock value manipulation not actually doing a business, and before Reagan had thoroughly rat fucked the American financial system to be a pure engine of capitalistic wealth and power consolidation it is today, it was still at best a scoreboard
Its a misery index of how much wealth can be extracted from the working class.
And it's mostly down if you calculate inflation correctly. NVDA, TSLA, MSFT and now anthropic priced like Walmart are all green 😂 AI bubble gonna turn it all red
More a reflection of inflation.
More ~~a reflection~~ the main driver of inflation.
FTFY
According to prolapse Bondi it is.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Q71Xb1Sd86M
I love that people can make art out of stupid comments by politicians
It’s an economic gauge for the small segment of society that gets more income from investments than they do from wages.
…have you seen the stock market?
Jesus tap-dancing christ
Rich people think the Dow is the best indicator of the economy, but 90% of people couldn't tell you where the Dow is on a daily basis.
GAS PRICES are the prime indicator of the economy for most Americans, and they are posted on EVERY street corner.
When they ask "Have you seen the stock market?" Say, "No, why would I? Have you seen the price of gas?"
"Look at how much the dollar has devalued!"
He could just admit what all the MAGAts want: "If we make it harder for disenfranchised minorities to survive, that benefits straight, white, maies, right? This is what people voted for!"
I haven't seen a debate go that sideways since Charlie Kirk...
That guy he's arguing against, Parker, basically debates against random MAGA people for a living. I think I saw a comment from someone on one of these videos that he debates people for hours a day.
The thing that I think he's exceptionally good at is rattling off a bunch of surprisingly relevant facts like he did in this video. I've seen many other people try to quickly rattle off facts in a debate like that, and they almost always either stray off topic or end up exaggerating so much that it's become a lie. But somehow Parker manages to avoid those things.
Anyways, my point is that you'd have to be crazy to try to debate against Parker without knowing at least a few facts to support your point.
I don't think Rubin is crazy, he just doesn't care. Hes made loads of money pandering to the right while having to do zero work or reading.
Parker is a saint. I don't know how he can argue with that many clearly unhinged yet seemingly ordinary people and not lose his mind. His videos after Charlie Kirk had his money put where his neck was were especially heartbreaking.
"People have less money to spend on fentanyl."
that's all i could think of
I'm not sure if that's an improvement or not, I get it, I want some fentanyl from time to time
The guy whose entire base is made up of people talking shit about him is an idiot?
Well who woulda thunk it
The ignorant sonsabitches that don’t thunk mighta thunk it ifin they had the ability to thunk!
Trump ran for a return to the Oval Office in 2024 on a promise to bring inflation under control and end “forever war” commitments overseas.
Instead, he has introduced a reciprocal tariffs policy that has seen the increased cost of imports passed onto consumers and attacked Iran, resulting in higher gas prices following the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
The thing is, they're fucking stupid and incapable of learning. A lot of this is because of our hollowed-out educational system, but some are just meth-addict fucks. Fuck them. I hope they burn.
NAFTA. He ended NAFTA.
That was good for worker's rights in Mexico.
Lol every time I hear NAFTA I think about the scene in King of the Hill where he thinks the guy is giving him a rolled up cigarette and blames NAFTA for being the cause of the "clearly inferior tobacco". It was a joint.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uCJzlzcAuWY&pp=ygUeS2luZyBvZiB0aGUgaGlsbCBqb2ludCBzbW9raW5n
M y
A ss
G ot
A nnihilated!
god I wish this was me
Humble brag
“Comedian” Dave Rubin, most spineless, shameless dipshit on planet earth. The impressive thing is how he is completely unfazed by being completely humiliated by his interlocutors.
It's kind of funny watching these conservative "pundits" think they are there to "own" all the normal Americans (non-conservatives) and they either believe their bullshit so hard or they want to believe it. And then faceplant.
For example, Scott Jennings. It's funny to see cons trying to spin clips of him "owning" others on that panel or whatever.
They’ve been watching decades of Faux News and other conservative programming, along with people like Charlie Kirk, that steamroll their opponents with bullshit, loaded questions, and Gish Gallop so heavily that there’s no possible way to disprove them in the time given - and that’s if they don’t just shout them down or outright ignore their rebuttal.
So these wannabe “kirks” just try to mash the easy button without realizing how controlled the environments are in which the conservative pundits operate to prevent actual opposition.
I think Scott Jennings is maybe stepping down now. Wonder if it has anything to do with him melting down when debating Adam Mockler.
Good grief, Scott is just a gigantic baby. He seems to love to do his gaslighting of others then acting all shocked and gives gigantic smirks about how "emotional" others are, but apparently Mockler really gets under his skin by asking basic fucking questions, LOL.
It's always projection with conservatives. ALWAYS. If they cannot control the framing of a discussion - meaning, allowed to get away with lies, Gish Gallop, cut mics of those they disagree with, and loads of logical fallacies, it is they who suddenly catch feelings.
I know of at least two times where Scott got all butthurt over questions from Mockler. Probably drives him crazy that someone that looks like he's still in junior high runs circles around him. Also, Mockler is gay, LOL.
He improved and made efficient open corruption.
He made billions. Many americans elected him because "this guy knows how to make money". Well he did so in his opinion, it's good for the economy, don't look further than that.
At what minute do they laugh about the question? I think I saw the moment ge asked that but the laughter was minutes later regarding something else